Dataset Information

EVIDENCE: a practical variant filtering for low-frequency variants detection in cell-free DNA.

ABSTRACT: Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing plays an increasingly important role in precision medicine for cancer. However, circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) is highly diluted by cfDNA from non-cancer cells, complicating ctDNA detection and analysis. To identify low-frequency variants, we developed a program, eVIDENCE, which is a workflow for filtering candidate variants detected by using the ThruPLEX tag-seq (Takara Bio), a commercially-available molecular barcoding kit. We analyzed 27 cfDNA samples from hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Sequencing libraries were constructed and hybridized to our custom panel targeting about 80 genes. An initial variant calling identified 36,500 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 9,300 insertions and deletions (indels) across the 27 samples, but the number was much greater than expected when compared with previous cancer genome studies. eVIDENCE was applied to the candidate variants and finally 70 SNVs and 7 indels remained. Of the 77 variants, 49 (63.6%) showed VAF of?

SUBMITTER: Mizuno K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6805874 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

eVIDENCE: a practical variant filtering for low-frequency variants detection in cell-free DNA.

Mizuno Kei K Akamatsu Shusuke S Sumiyoshi Takayuki T Wong Jing Hao JH Fujita Masashi M Maejima Kazuaki K Nakano Kaoru K Ono Atushi A Aikata Hiroshi H Ueno Masaki M Hayami Shinya S Yamaue Hiroki H Chayama Kazuaki K Inoue Takahiro T Ogawa Osamu O Nakagawa Hidewaki H Fujimoto Akihiro A

Scientific reports 20191022 1

Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing plays an increasingly important role in precision medicine for cancer. However, circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) is highly diluted by cfDNA from non-cancer cells, complicating ctDNA detection and analysis. To identify low-frequency variants, we developed a program, eVIDENCE, which is a workflow for filtering candidate variants detected by using the ThruPLEX tag-seq (Takara Bio), a commercially-available molecular barcoding kit. We analyzed 27 cfDNA sam ...[more]

PMID: 31641155

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a subset of cell free DNA (cfDNA) released by tumour cells into the bloodstream. Circulating tumour DNA has shown great potential as a biomarker to inform treatment in cancer patients. Collecting ctDNA is minimally invasive and reflects the entire genetic makeup of a patient's cancer. ctDNA variants in NGS data can be difficult to distinguish from sequencing and PCR artefacts due to low abundance, particularly in the early stages of cancer. Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) are short sequences ligated to the sequencing library before amplification. These sequences are useful for filtering out low frequency artefacts. The utility of ctDNA as a cancer biomarker depends on accurate detection of cancer variants.ResultsIn this study, we benchmarked six variant calling tools, including two UMI-aware callers for their ability to call ctDNA variants. The standard variant callers tested included Mutect2, bcftools, LoFreq and FreeBayes. The UMI-aware variant callers benchmarked were UMI-VarCal and UMIErrorCorrect. We used both datasets with known variants spiked in at low frequencies, and datasets containing ctDNA, and generated synthetic UMI sequences for these datasets. Variant callers displayed different preferences for sensitivity and specificity. Mutect2 showed high sensitivity, while returning more privately called variants than any other caller in data without synthetic UMIs - an indicator of false positive variant discovery. In data encoded with synthetic UMIs, UMI-VarCal detected fewer putative false positive variants than all other callers in synthetic datasets. Mutect2 showed a balance between high sensitivity and specificity in data encoded with synthetic UMIs.ConclusionsOur results indicate UMI-aware variant callers have potential to improve sensitivity and specificity in calling low frequency ctDNA variants over standard variant calling tools. There is a growing need for further development of UMI-aware variant calling tools if effective early detection methods for cancer using ctDNA samples are to be realised.

Project description:Detection of low-frequency variants with high accuracy plays an important role in biomedical research and clinical practice. However, it is challenging to do so with next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches due to the high error rates of NGS. To accurately distinguish low-level true variants from these errors, many statistical variants calling tools for calling low-frequency variants have been proposed, but a systematic performance comparison of these tools has not yet been performed. Here, we evaluated four raw-reads-based variant callers (SiNVICT, outLyzer, Pisces, and LoFreq) and four UMI-based variant callers (DeepSNVMiner, MAGERI, smCounter2, and UMI-VarCal) considering their capability to call single nucleotide variants (SNVs) with allelic frequency as low as 0.025% in deep sequencing data. We analyzed a total of 54 simulated data with various sequencing depths and variant allele frequencies (VAFs), two reference data, and Horizon Tru-Q sample data. The results showed that the UMI-based callers, except smCounter2, outperformed the raw-reads-based callers regarding detection limit. Sequencing depth had almost no effect on the UMI-based callers but significantly influenced on the raw-reads-based callers. Regardless of the sequencing depth, MAGERI showed the fastest analysis, while smCounter2 consistently took the longest to finish the variant calling process. Overall, DeepSNVMiner and UMI-VarCal performed the best with considerably good sensitivity and precision of 88%, 100%, and 84%, 100%, respectively. In conclusion, the UMI-based callers, except smCounter2, outperformed the raw-reads-based callers in terms of sensitivity and precision. We recommend using DeepSNVMiner and UMI-VarCal for low-frequency variant detection. The results provide important information regarding future directions for reliable low-frequency variant detection and algorithm development, which is critical in genetics-based medical research and clinical applications.

Project description:BackgroundSensitive detection of low-frequency single nucleotide variants carries great significance in many applications. In cancer genetics research, tumor biopsies are a mixture of normal and tumor cells from various subpopulations due to tumor heterogeneity. Thus the frequencies of somatic variants from a subpopulation tend to be low. Liquid biopsies, which monitor circulating tumor DNA in blood to detect metastatic potential, also face the challenge of detecting low-frequency variants due to the small percentage of the circulating tumor DNA in blood. Moreover, in population genetics research, although pooled sequencing of a large number of individuals is cost-effective, pooling dilutes the signals of variants from any individual. Detection of low frequency variants is difficult and can be cofounded by sequencing artifacts. Existing methods are limited in sensitivity and mainly focus on frequencies around 2 % to 5 %; most fail to consider differential sequencing artifacts.ResultsWe aimed to push down the frequency detection limit close to the position specific sequencing error rates by modeling the observed erroneous read counts with respect to genomic sequence contexts. 4 distributions suitable for count data modeling (using generalized linear models) were extensively characterized in terms of their goodness-of-fit as well as the performances on real sequencing data benchmarks, which were specifically designed for testing detection of low-frequency variants; two sequencing technologies with significantly different chemistry mechanisms were used to explore systematic errors. We found the zero-inflated negative binomial distribution generalized linear mode is superior to the other models tested, and the advantage is most evident at 0.5 % to 1 % range. This method is also generalizable to different sequencing technologies. Under standard sequencing protocols and depth given in the testing benchmarks, 95.3 % recall and 79.9 % precision for Ion Proton data, 95.6 % recall and 97.0 % precision for Illumina MiSeq data were achieved for SNVs with frequency > = 1 %, while the detection limit is around 0.5 %.ConclusionsOur method enables sensitive detection of low-frequency single nucleotide variants across different sequencing platforms and will facilitate research and clinical applications such as pooled sequencing, cancer early detection, prognostic assessment, metastatic monitoring, and relapses or acquired resistance identification.

Dataset Information

EVIDENCE: a practical variant filtering for low-frequency variants detection in cell-free DNA.

Publications

eVIDENCE: a practical variant filtering for low-frequency variants detection in cell-free DNA.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets