Dataset Information

Optimal Multiphase Computed Tomographic Angiography-based Infarct Core Estimations for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

ABSTRACT: We evaluated the best methods for predicting various infarct core thresholds for endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke using parameters obtained by multiphase computed tomographic angiography (mCTA). Consecutive patients evaluated for endovascular treatment who concomitantly underwent mCTA and stroke magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were analyzed. The ability of CTA-based collaterals (single-phase [sCTAc] and multiphase [mCTAc]) and ASPECTS or their combined interpretation for the selection of patients with cores of <31?ml and <70?ml, and ?100?ml, were compared. In the total 142 patients, the combined interpretation of collateral scores and ASPECTS score indicated significant added benefit for the prediction of smaller infarct volume thresholds (<31?ml) compared to ASPECTS alone. Selection of cases that satisfied both sCTAc 3-5 and ASPECTS 6-10 had the optimal predictive capability and inter-rater reliability. While the combined interpretation did not provide a significant added benefit for the prediction of larger infarct volume thresholds, sCTAc 0-2 and mCTAc 0-2 performed as well as ASPECTS 0-5 in prediction of core volumes ?100?ml with better inter-rater reliability. sCTA and mCTA can improve the selection of patients for EVT by more accurately predicting lower infarct core volume cutoffs. When excluding patients with large infarct cores, they can improve inter-rater reliability.

SUBMITTER: Lee SJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6811584 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Optimal Multiphase Computed Tomographic Angiography-based Infarct Core Estimations for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Lee Seong-Joon SJ Jung Woo Sang WS Choi Mun Hee MH Hong Ji Man JM Lee Jin Soo JS Choi Jin Wook JW

Scientific reports 20191023 1

We evaluated the best methods for predicting various infarct core thresholds for endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke using parameters obtained by multiphase computed tomographic angiography (mCTA). Consecutive patients evaluated for endovascular treatment who concomitantly underwent mCTA and stroke magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were analyzed. The ability of CTA-based collaterals (single-phase [sCTAc] and multiphase [mCTAc]) and ASPECTS or their combined interpretation for the selection ...[more]

PMID: 31645640

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and purposeMultiphase computed tomographic angiography (mCTA) provides time variant images of pial vasculature supplying brain in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To develop a machine learning (ML) technique to predict tissue perfusion and infarction from mCTA source images.Methods284 patients with AIS were included from the Precise and Rapid assessment of collaterals using multi-phase CTA in the triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke for Intra-artery Therapy (Prove-IT) study. All patients had non-contrast computed tomography, mCTA, and computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) at baseline and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging/non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Of the 284 patient images, 140 patient images were randomly selected to train and validate three ML models to predict a pre-defined Tmax thresholded perfusion abnormality, core and penumbra on CTP. The remaining 144 patient images were used to test the ML models. The predicted perfusion, core and penumbra lesions from ML models were compared to CTP perfusion lesion and to follow-up infarct using Bland-Altman plots, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and Dice similarity coefficient.ResultsMean difference between the mCTA predicted perfusion volume and CTP perfusion volume was 4.6 mL (limit of agreement [LoA], -53 to 62.1 mL; P=0.56; CCC 0.63 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.71; P<0.01], ICC 0.68 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.78; P<0.001]). Mean difference between the mCTA predicted infarct and follow-up infarct in the 100 patients with acute reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [mTICI] 2b/2c/3) was 21.7 mL, while it was 3.4 mL in the 44 patients not achieving reperfusion (mTICI 0/1). Amongst reperfused subjects, CCC was 0.4 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.55; P<0.01) and ICC was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.50; P<0.01); in non-reperfused subjects CCC was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.60; P<0.001) and ICC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.76; P<0.001). No difference was observed between the mCTA and CTP predicted infarct volume in the test cohort (P=0.67).ConclusionsA ML based mCTA model is able to predict brain tissue perfusion abnormality and follow-up infarction, comparable to CTP.

Project description:PurposeTo test whether the relationship between acute ischemic infarct size on concurrent computed tomographic (CT) angiography source images and diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance images is dependent on the parameters of CT angiography acquisition protocols.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study had institutional review board approval, and all records were HIPAA compliant. Data in 100 patients with anterior-circulation acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion who underwent concurrent CT angiography and DW imaging within 9 hours of symptom onset were analyzed. Measured areas of hyperintensity at acute DW imaging were used as the standard of reference for infarct size. Information regarding lesion volumes and CT angiography protocol parameters was collected for each patient. For analysis, patients were divided into two groups on the basis of CT angiography protocol differences (patients in group 1 were imaged with the older, slower protocol). Intermethod agreement for infarct size was evaluated by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, as well as by using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of marked (?20%) overestimation of infarct size on CT angiography source images.ResultsIn group 1 (n=35), median hypoattenuation volumes on CT angiography source images were slightly underestimated compared with DW imaging hyperintensity volumes (33.0 vs 41.6 mL, P=.01; ratio=0.83), with high correlation (?=0.91). In group 2 (n=65), median volume on CT angiography source images was much larger than that on DW images (94.8 vs 17.8 mL, P<.0001; ratio=3.5), with poor correlation (?=0.49). This overestimation on CT angiography source images would have inappropriately excluded from reperfusion therapy 44.4% or 90.3% of patients eligible according to DW imaging criteria on the basis of a 100-mL absolute threshold or a 20% or greater mismatch threshold, respectively. Atrial fibrillation and shorter time from contrast material injection to image acquisition were independent predictors of marked (?20%) infarct size overestimation on CT angiography source images.ConclusionCT angiography protocol changes designed to speed imaging and optimize arterial opacification are associated with significant overestimation of infarct size on CT angiography source images.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS:Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent CT perfusion, CTA, and DSA before thrombectomy with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, the M1 or the M2 segments were included. Two observers assessed all CT images and one separate observer assessed DSA (reference standard) with static and dynamic (modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) collateral grading methods. Interobserver agreement and concordance were quantified with Cohen-weighted ? and concordance correlation coefficient, respectively. Imaging assessments were related to clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, ? 2). RESULTS:Interobserver agreement (n = 101) was 0.46 (tMIP), 0.58 (3-phase CTA), 0.67 (multiphase CTA), and 0.69 (single-phase CTA) for static assessments and 0.52 (3-phase CTA) and 0.54 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Concordance correlation coefficient (n = 80) was 0.08 (3-phase CTA), 0.09 (single-phase CTA), and 0.23 (multiphase CTA) for static assessments and 0.10 (3-phase CTA) and 0.27 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Higher static collateral scores on multiphase CTA (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7) and tMIP images (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.4) were associated with modified Rankin Scale of 2 or less as were higher modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology scores on 3-phase CTA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2) and multiphase CTA (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). CONCLUSIONS:Concordance between assessments on CT and DSA was poor. Collateral status evaluated on 3-phase CTA and multiphase CTA, but not on DSA, was associated with clinical outcome.

Project description:In stroke care, the extent of irreversible brain injury, termed infarct core, plays a key role in determining eligibility for acute treatments, such as intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular reperfusion therapies. Many of the pivotal randomized clinical trials testing those therapies used MRI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) or CT Perfusion (CTP) to define infarct core. Unfortunately, these modalities are not available 24/7 outside of large stroke centers. As such, there is a need for accurate infarct core determination using faster and more widely available imaging modalities including Non-Contrast CT (NCCT) and CT Angiography (CTA). Prior studies have suggested that CTA provides improved predictions of infarct core relative to NCCT; however, this assertion has never been numerically quantified by automatic medical image computing pipelines using acquisition protocols not confounded by different scanner manufacturers, or other protocol settings such as exposure times, kilovoltage peak, or imprecision due to contrast bolus delays. In addition, single-phase CTA protocols are at present designed to optimize contrast opacification in the arterial phase. This approach works well to maximize the sensitivity to detect vessel occlusions, however, it may not be the ideal timing to enhance the ischemic infarct core signal (ICS). In this work, we propose an image analysis pipeline on CT-based images of 88 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients drawn from a single dynamic acquisition protocol acquired at the acute ischemic phase. We use the first scan at the time of the dynamic acquisition as a proxy for NCCT, and the rest of the scans as a proxy for CTA scans, with bolus imaged at different brain enhancement phases. Thus, we use the terms "NCCT" and "CTA" to refer to them. This pipeline enables us to answer the questions "Does the injection of bolus enhance the infarct core signal?" and "What is the ideal bolus timing to enhance the infarct core signal?" without being influenced by aforementioned factors such as scanner model, acquisition settings, contrast bolus delay, and human reader errors. We use reference MRI DWI images acquired after successful recanalization acting as our gold standard for infarct core. The ICS is quantified by calculating the difference in intensity distribution between the infarct core region and its symmetrical healthy counterpart on the contralateral hemisphere of the brain using a metric derived from information theory, the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KL divergence). We compare the ICS provided by NCCT and CTA and retrieve the optimal timing of CTA bolus to maximize the ICS. In our experiments, we numerically confirm that CTAs provide greater ICS compared to NCCT. Then, we find that, on average, the ideal CTA acquisition time to maximize the ICS is not the current target of standard CTA protocols, i.e., during the peak of arterial enhancement, but a few seconds afterward (median of 3 s; 95% CI [1.5, 3.0]). While there are other studies comparing the prediction potential of ischemic infarct core from NCCT and CTA images, to the best of our knowledge, this analysis is the first to perform a quantitative comparison of the ICS among CT based scans, with and without bolus injection, acquired using the same scanning sequence and a precise characterization of the bolus uptake, hence, reducing potential confounding factors.

Dataset Information

Optimal Multiphase Computed Tomographic Angiography-based Infarct Core Estimations for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Publications

Optimal Multiphase Computed Tomographic Angiography-based Infarct Core Estimations for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets