Project description:BackgroundInterstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a group of pulmonary disorders affecting the lung's structure. Acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD) following medical procedures is a significant clinical concern. Lung cryoprobe transbronchial biopsy (cryobiopsy) is a relatively new diagnostic technique for ILD, but data on AE-ILD post-cryobiopsy is limited. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of AE-ILD following cryobiopsy.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study analyzed data from patients who underwent cryobiopsy for ILD diagnosis at three U.S. institutions between January 2014 and August 2022. The study included patients over 18 years with confirmed or suspected ILD, categorized into those who experienced AE-ILD post-cryobiopsy and those who did not.ResultsOut of 111 patients, 3.6% experienced AE-ILD, with a 50% mortality rate in these cases. The study cohort was predominantly white, with a median age of 69.0 years. Common comorbidities included tobacco use and hypertension. Patients who developed AE-ILD had an increased median number of biopsies. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.8%. Overall complication rate was 32%, including pneumonia, pneumothorax, AE-ILD, and bleeding requiring intervention. The study findings suggest that bronchoscopic cryobiopsy may be associated with lower overall mortality, particularly in patients with compromised lung function.ConclusionsThis study provides significant insights into AE-ILD following cryobiopsy, underscoring the need for careful patient selection and procedural assessment. While cryobiopsy may offer a safer alternative to surgical lung biopsy in specific patient cohorts, the elevated risk of AE-ILD necessitates further research to optimize patient outcomes and procedural safety.
Project description:BackgroundPatients suffering from combined obstructive and interstitial lung disease (O-ILD) represent a pathological entity which still has to be well clinically described. The aim of this descriptive and explorative study was to describe the phenotype and functional characteristics of a cohort of patients suffering from functional obstruction in a population of ILD patients in order to raise the need of dedicated prospective observational studies and the evaluation of the impact of anti-fibrotic therapies.MethodsThe current authors conducted a retrospective study including 557 ILD patients, with either obstructive (O-ILD, n = 82) or non-obstructive (non O-ILD, n = 475) pattern. Patients included were mainly males (54%) with a mean age of 62 years.ResultsPatients with O-ILD exhibited a characteristic functional profile with reduced percent predicted forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1) [65% (53-77) vs 83% (71-96), p < 0.00001], small airway involvement assessed by maximum expiratory flow (MEF) 25/75 [29% (20-41) vs 81% (64-108), p < 0.00001], reduced sGaw [60% (42-75) vs 87% (59-119), p < 0.01] and sub-normal functional residual capacity (FRC) [113% (93-134) vs 92% (75-109), p < 0.00001] with no impaired of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO) compared to those without obstruction. Total lung capacity (TLC) was increased in O-ILD patients [93% (82-107) vs 79% (69-91), p < 0.00001]. Of interest, DLCO sharply dropped in O-ILD patients over a 5-year follow-up. We did not identify a significant increase in mortality in patients with O-ILD. Interestingly, the global mortality was increased in the specific sub-group of patients with O-ILD and no progressive fibrosing ILD phenotype and in those with connective tissue disease associated ILD especially in case of rheumatoid arthritis.ConclusionsThe authors individualized a specific functional-based pattern of ILD patients with obstructive lung disease, who are at risk of increased mortality and rapid DLCO decline over time. As classically those patients are excluded from clinical trials, a dedicated prospective study would be of interest in order to define more precisely treatment response of those patients.
Project description:Consumers most commonly discard unwanted medicines in household rubbish or drains, however, there are global concerns over the extent, environmental impact and health risks. When consumers procure or store medicines for future use, this can impact negatively on quality use of medicines and consumer safety. We sought greater insight into the extent of these practices by exploring the volume and types of medicines in Australian homes, and self-reported practices related to medicine accumulation, use and disposal. This qualitative study formed part of a larger project that included a general population survey on household medicine disposal practices.Semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken with a subset of respondents (n?=?166) from the survey. Participants were eligible if they were experienced medicine users, i.e. used five or more prescribed, over the counter, and/or complementary and alternative medicines. Participants were asked to collect and name all medicines in their household; further detail was obtained about medicines used only when required or no longer used, such as expiry dates and quantity remaining. The quantitative data on the number and type of medicines stored at home were analysed descriptively. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.A total of 2301 medicines were identified as 1424 medicines not in everyday use (unused, unwanted, expired or when required) in 166 households, and 877 regularly used medicines by 119 participants. Medicines were often stored in multiple locations, particularly kitchens. Although accidental ingestion in children and pets and decreased efficacy were recognised health risks, this did not always translate to appropriate storage, usage or disposal practices. Individual risk-benefit assessments were applied to decisions to retain, use or dispose of medicines, including expired medicines.Inappropriate medicine storage, use, and/or disposal practices raises public health concerns, particularly as there is a free returned medicines scheme available, and that this particular participant group were considered experienced medicine users. Healthcare professionals must act to address consumer misconceptions around the quality use of medicines, including medicine retention, storage and disposal. Future research is warranted to explore consumer practices in this context and confirm these findings in a younger, or healthier population.