Dataset Information

Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites.

ABSTRACT: Introduction:Longitudinal cohort studies of cognitive aging must confront several sources of within-person variability in scores. In this article, we compare several neuropsychological measures in terms of longitudinal error variance and relationships with biomarker-assessed brain amyloidosis (A?). Methods:Analyses used data from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention. We quantified within-person longitudinal variability and age-related trajectories for several global and domain-specific composites and their constituent scores. For a subset with cerebrospinal fluid or amyloid positron emission tomography measures, we examined how A? modified cognitive trajectories. Results:Global and theoretically derived composites exhibited lower intraindividual variability and stronger age × A? interactions than did empirically derived composites or raw scores from single tests. For example, the theoretical executive function outperformed other executive function scores on both metrics. Discussion:These results reinforce the need for careful selection of cognitive outcomes in study design, and support the emerging consensus favoring composites over single-test measures.

SUBMITTER: Jonaitis EM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6816509 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites.

Jonaitis Erin M EM Koscik Rebecca L RL Clark Lindsay R LR Ma Yue Y Betthauser Tobey J TJ Berman Sara E SE Allison Samantha L SL Mueller Kimberly D KD Hermann Bruce P BP Van Hulle Carol A CA Christian Bradley T BT Bendlin Barbara B BB Blennow Kaj K Zetterberg Henrik H Carlsson Cynthia M CM Asthana Sanjay S Johnson Sterling C SC

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 20190111

<h4>Introduction</h4>Longitudinal cohort studies of cognitive aging must confront several sources of within-person variability in scores. In this article, we compare several neuropsychological measures in terms of longitudinal error variance and relationships with biomarker-assessed brain amyloidosis (Aβ).<h4>Methods</h4>Analyses used data from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention. We quantified within-person longitudinal variability and age-related trajectories for several global a ...[more]

PMID: 31673596

Similar Datasets

Project description:Diagnostic tests are frequently reliant upon the interpretation of images by skilled raters. In many clinical settings, however, the variability observed between experts' ratings plays a detrimental role in the degree of confidence in these interpretations, leading to uncertainty in the diagnostic process. For example, in breast cancer testing, radiologists interpret mammographic images, while breast biopsy results are examined by pathologists. Each of these procedures involves elements of subjectivity. We propose here a flexible two-stage Bayesian latent variable model to investigate how the skills of individual raters impact the diagnostic accuracy of image-related testing in large-scale medical testing studies. A strength of the proposed model is that the true disease status of a patient within a reasonable time frame may or may not be known. In these studies, many raters each contribute classifications on a large sample of patients using a defined ordinal grading scale, leading to a complex correlation structure between ratings. Our modeling approach considers the different sources of variability contributed by experts and patients while accounting for correlations present between ratings and patients, in contrast to currently available methods. We propose a novel measure of a rater's ability (magnifier) that, in contrast to conventional measures of sensitivity and specificity, is robust to the underlying prevalence of disease in the population, providing an alternative measure of diagnostic accuracy across patient populations. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate lower bias in estimation of parameters and measures of accuracy, and illustrate outperformance of the proposed model when compared with existing models. Receiver operator characteristic curves are derived to assess the diagnostic accuracy of individual experts and their overall performance. Our proposed modeling approach is applied to a large breast imaging study for known disease status and a uterine cancer dataset for unknown disease status.

Dataset Information

Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites.

Publications

Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure