Dataset Information

A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the role of computed tomography in adults with atypical right iliac fossa pain.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:In patients with right iliac fossa pain, the need for surgery is largely determined by the likelihood of appendicitis. Patients often undergo ultrasound scanning despite a low diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a larger trial of computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with atypical right iliac fossa pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A single-centre, unblinded, parallel randomised controlled trial of computed tomography in the assessment of patients with atypical right iliac fossa pain. After a retrospective evaluation, standard care was defined as serial examination with or without ultrasound. Atypical right iliac fossa pain was defined as no firm diagnosis after initial senior review. Simple descriptions of the risks and benefits of computed tomography were devised for patients to consider. Primary objectives were to assess feasibility and acceptability of the study procedures. RESULTS:A total of 71 patients were invited to participate and 68 were randomised. Final analysis included 31 participants in the standard care arm and 33 in the computed tomography arm, with comparable demographics. Computed tomography was associated with superior diagnostic accuracy, with 100% positive and negative predictive value. The proportion of scans that positively influenced management was 73% for computed tomography and 0% for ultrasound. In the computed tomography arm, there was a trend towards a shorter length of stay (2.3 vs 3.1 days) and a lower negative laparoscopy rate (2 of 11 vs 4 of 9). CONCLUSION:A large randomised trial to evaluate the use of unenhanced computed tomography in atypical right iliac fossa pain appears feasible and justified.

SUBMITTER: Jones R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6818076 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the role of computed tomography in adults with atypical right iliac fossa pain.

Jones R R Olatunbode D D Dean J J Hall B B Harji D D Davis P P Ahmed Ish I Ansari Rehaan R Bookless Lucy L Chidumije Nnaemeka N Duffin Jacob J Edwards Nehemiah N Firescu Mihai M Grainge Stephanie S Harbit Andrew A Hollingsworth Andrew A Imam Zehra Z Keast Laura L Li Mimi M Mbarushimana Simon S McElnay Phil P Mellen Jamie J Miller Dan D Munipalle Chakri C Musbahi Aya A Norton David D Omar Kareem K Smith Ben B Teo Alvin A Yuan Jianan J

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 20190620 8

<h4>Background</h4>In patients with right iliac fossa pain, the need for surgery is largely determined by the likelihood of appendicitis. Patients often undergo ultrasound scanning despite a low diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a larger trial of computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with atypical right iliac fossa pain.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A single-centre, unblinded, parallel randomised controlled trial of computed tomogr ...[more]

PMID: 31219315

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective To evaluate whether invasive coronary angiography or computed tomography (CT) should be performed in patients clinically referred for coronary angiography with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease.Design Prospective randomised single centre trial.Setting University hospital in Germany.Participants 340 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a clinical indication for coronary angiography on the basis of atypical angina or chest pain.Interventions 168 patients were randomised to CT and 172 to coronary angiography. After randomisation one patient declined CT and 10 patients declined coronary angiography, leaving 167 patients (88 women) and 162 patients (78 women) for analysis. Allocation could not be blinded, but blinded independent investigators assessed outcomes.Main outcome measure The primary outcome measure was major procedural complications within 48 hours of the last procedure related to CT or angiography.Results Cardiac CT reduced the need for coronary angiography from 100% to 14% (95% confidence interval 9% to 20%, P<0.001) and was associated with a significantly greater diagnostic yield from coronary angiography: 75% (53% to 90%) v 15% (10% to 22%), P<0.001. Major procedural complications were uncommon (0.3%) and similar across groups. Minor procedural complications were less common in the CT group than in the coronary angiography group: 3.6% (1% to 8%) v 10.5% (6% to 16%), P=0.014. CT shortened the median length of stay in the angiography group from 52.9 hours (interquartile range 49.5-76.4 hours) to 30.0 hours (3.5-77.3 hours, P<0.001). Overall median exposure to radiation was similar between the CT and angiography groups: 5.0 mSv (interquartile range 4.2-8.7 mSv) v 6.4 mSv (3.4-10.7 mSv), P=0.45. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, major adverse cardiovascular events had occurred in seven of 167 patients in the CT group (4.2%) and six of 162 (3.7%) in the coronary angiography group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 2.69, P=0.86). 79% of patients stated that they would prefer CT for subsequent testing. The study was conducted at a University hospital in Germany and thus the performance of CT may be different in routine clinical practice. The prevalence was lower than expected, resulting in an underpowered study for the predefined primary outcome.Conclusions CT increased the diagnostic yield and was a safe gatekeeper for coronary angiography with no increase in long term events. The length of stay was shortened by 22.9 hours with CT, and patients preferred non-invasive testing.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00844220.

Project description:ObjectivesUpright computed tomography (CT) can detect slight changes particularly in the superior vena cava (SVC) volume in healthy volunteers under the influence of gravity. This study aimed to evaluate whether upright CT-based measurements of the SVC area are useful for assessing mean right atrial pressure (mRAP) in patients with heart failure.MethodsWe performed CT in both standing and supine positions to evaluate the SVC (directly below the junction of the bilateral brachiocephalic veins) and inferior vena cava (IVC; at the height of the diaphragm) areas and analyzed their relationship with mRAP, measured by right heart catheterization in 23 patients with heart failure.ResultsThe median age of enrolled patients was 60 (51-72) years, and 69.6% were male. The median mRAP was 3 (1-7) mmHg. The correlations between the standing position SVC and IVC areas and mRAP were stronger than those in the supine position (SVC, ρ = 0.68, p < 0.001 and ρ = 0.43, p = 0.040; IVC, ρ = 0.57, p = 0.005 and ρ = 0.46, p = 0.026; respectively). Furthermore, the SVC area in the standing position was most accurate in identifying patients with higher mRAP (> 5 mmHg) (SVC standing, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.00; SVC supine, AUC = 0.78, 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; IVC standing, AUC = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.55-0.98; IVC supine, AUC = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.49-0.94). The inter- and intraobserver agreements (evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients) for all CT measurements were 0.962-0.991.ConclusionsUpright CT-based measurement of the SVC area can be useful for non-invasive estimation of mRAP under the influence of gravity in patients with heart failure.Key points• This study showed that the superior vena cava (SVC) area in the standing position was most accurate in identifying patients with heart failure with higher mean right atrial pressure. • Upright computed tomography-based measurements of the SVC area can be a promising non-invasive method for estimating mean right atrial pressure under the influence of gravity in patients with heart failure. • Clinical management of patients with heart failure based on this non-invasive modality may lead to early assessment of conditional changes and reduced hospitalization for exacerbation of heart failure.

Project description:BackgroundSpatial normalization is a prerequisite step for analyzing positron emission tomography (PET) images both by using volume-of-interest (VOI) template and voxel-based analysis. Magnetic resonance (MR) or ligand-specific PET templates are currently used for spatial normalization of PET images. We used computed tomography (CT) images acquired with PET/CT scanner for the spatial normalization for [18F]-N-3-fluoropropyl-2-betacarboxymethoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane (FP-CIT) PET images and compared target-to-cerebellar standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) values with those obtained from MR- or PET-guided spatial normalization method in healthy controls and patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).MethodsWe included 71 healthy controls and 56 patients with PD who underwent [18F]-FP-CIT PET scans with a PET/CT scanner and T1-weighted MR scans. Spatial normalization of MR images was done with a conventional spatial normalization tool (cvMR) and with DARTEL toolbox (dtMR) in statistical parametric mapping software. The CT images were modified in two ways, skull-stripping (ssCT) and intensity transformation (itCT). We normalized PET images with cvMR-, dtMR-, ssCT-, itCT-, and PET-guided methods by using specific templates for each modality and measured striatal SUVR with a VOI template. The SUVR values measured with FreeSurfer-generated VOIs (FSVOI) overlaid on original PET images were also used as a gold standard for comparison.ResultsThe SUVR values derived from all four structure-guided spatial normalization methods were highly correlated with those measured with FSVOI (P < 0.0001). Putaminal SUVR values were highly effective for discriminating PD patients from controls. However, the PET-guided method excessively overestimated striatal SUVR values in the PD patients by more than 30% in caudate and putamen, and thereby spoiled the linearity between the striatal SUVR values in all subjects and showed lower disease discrimination ability. Two CT-guided methods showed comparable capability with the MR-guided methods in separating PD patients from controls and showed better correlation between putaminal SUVR values and the parkinsonian motor severity than the PET-guided method.ConclusionCT-guided spatial normalization methods provided reliable striatal SUVR values comparable to those obtained with MR-guided methods. CT-guided methods can be useful for analyzing dopamine transporter PET images when MR images are unavailable.

Dataset Information

A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the role of computed tomography in adults with atypical right iliac fossa pain.

Publications

A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the role of computed tomography in adults with atypical right iliac fossa pain.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets