Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Effectiveness of First-line Immune Checkpoint Blockade Versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Limited data compare first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade in cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. The primary evidence guiding treatment decisions was a recent Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency safety alert based on emerging data from two ongoing phase III trials, reporting shorter survival in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative patients receiving immunotherapy. Final results from these trials are unknown. OBJECTIVE:To compare survival in cisplatin-ineligible mUC patients receiving first-line immunotherapy versus those receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2017 mUC patients receiving first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy (n?=?1530) or immunotherapy (n?=?487) from January 1, 2011 to May 18, 2018 using the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), comparing 12- and 36-mo OS, and hazard ratios before and after 12 mo. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address confounding in Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model estimates of comparative effectiveness. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS:IPTW-adjusted OS rates in the immunotherapy group were lower at 12 mo (39.6% [95% confidence interval {CI} 34.0-45.3%] vs 46.1% [95% CI 43.4-48.8%]) but higher at 36 mo (28.3% [95% CI 21.8-34.7%] vs 13.3% [95% CI 11.1-15.5%]) relative to the chemotherapy group. Immunotherapy treatment demonstrated inferior OS during the first 12 mo relative to carboplatin-based chemotherapy (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.62), but superior OS beyond 12 mo (IPTW-adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.85). Limitations include retrospective design and potential unmeasured confounding. CONCLUSIONS:In the setting of mUC, clinicians and patients should carefully consider how to balance the short-term benefit of chemotherapy against the long-term benefit of immunotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY:To determine the optimal first-line therapy for metastatic bladder cancer patients who are unfit for cisplatin, we compared carboplatin-based chemotherapy versus immunotherapy using real-world data. Survival in the 1st year of treatment was lower with immunotherapy relative to chemotherapy, but for patients surviving beyond the 1st year, immunotherapy was superior.

SUBMITTER: Feld E 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6822167 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Effectiveness of First-line Immune Checkpoint Blockade Versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer.

Feld Emily E   Harton Joanna J   Meropol Neal J NJ   Adamson Blythe J S BJS   Cohen Aaron A   Parikh Ravi B RB   Galsky Matthew D MD   Narayan Vivek V   Christodouleas John J   Vaughn David J DJ   Hubbard Rebecca A RA   Mamtani Ronac R  

European urology 20190728 4


<h4>Background</h4>Limited data compare first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade in cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. The primary evidence guiding treatment decisions was a recent Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency safety alert based on emerging data from two ongoing phase III trials, reporting shorter survival in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative patients receiving immunotherapy. Final results from t  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3031362 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8053833 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6964136 | biostudies-literature