Dataset Information

Kinematic analyses including finite helical axes of drop jump landings demonstrate decreased knee control long after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

ABSTRACT: The purpose was to evaluate the dynamic knee control during a drop jump test following injury of the anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) using finite helical axes. Persons injured 17-28 years ago, treated with either physiotherapy (ACLPT, n = 23) or reconstruction and physiotherapy (ACLR, n = 28) and asymptomatic controls (CTRL, n = 22) performed a drop jump test, while kinematics were registered by motion capture. We analysed the Preparation phase (from maximal knee extension during flight until 50 ms post-touchdown) followed by an Action phase (until maximal knee flexion post-touchdown). Range of knee motion (RoM), and the length of each phase (Duration) were computed. The finite knee helical axis was analysed for momentary intervals of ~15° of knee motion by its intersection (?AP position) and inclination (?AP Inclination) with the knee's Anterior-Posterior (AP) axis. Static knee laxity (KT100) and self-reported knee function (Lysholm score) were also assessed. The results showed that both phases were shorter for the ACL groups compared to controls (CTRL-ACLR: Duration 35±8 ms, p = 0.000, CTRL-ACLPT: 33±9 ms, p = 0.000) and involved less knee flexion (CTRL-ACLR: RoM 6.6±1.9°, p = 0.002, CTRL-ACLR: 7.5 ±2.0°, p = 0.001). Low RoM and Duration correlated significantly with worse knee function according to Lysholm and higher knee laxity according to KT-1000. Three finite helical axes were analysed. The ?AP position for the first axis was most anterior in ACLPT compared to ACLR (?AP position -1, ACLPT-ACLR: 13±3 mm, p = 0.004), with correlations to KT-1000 (rho 0.316, p = 0.008), while the ?AP inclination for the third axis was smaller in the ACLPT group compared to controls (?AP inclination -3 ACLPT-CTRL: -13±5°, p = 0.004) and showed a significant side difference in ACL injured groups during Action (Injured-Non-injured: 8±2.7°, p = 0.006). Small ?AP inclination -3 correlated with low Lysholm (rho 0.391, p = 0.002) and high KT-1000 (rho -0.450, p = 0.001). Conclusions Compensatory movement strategies seem to be used to protect the injured knee during landing. A decreased ?AP inclination in injured knees during Action suggests that the dynamic knee control may remain compromised even long after injury.

SUBMITTER: Grip H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6822751 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Kinematic analyses including finite helical axes of drop jump landings demonstrate decreased knee control long after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Grip Helena H Tengman Eva E Liebermann Dario G DG Häger Charlotte K CK

PloS one 20191031 10

The purpose was to evaluate the dynamic knee control during a drop jump test following injury of the anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) using finite helical axes. Persons injured 17-28 years ago, treated with either physiotherapy (ACLPT, n = 23) or reconstruction and physiotherapy (ACLR, n = 28) and asymptomatic controls (CTRL, n = 22) performed a drop jump test, while kinematics were registered by motion capture. We analysed the Preparation phase (from maximal knee extension during flight ...[more]

PMID: 31671111

Similar Datasets

Project description:ContextAthletes with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) exhibit increased cortical motor planning during simple sensorimotor tasks compared with healthy athletes serving as control groups. This may interfere with proper decision making during time-constrained movements, elevating the reinjury risk.ObjectiveTo compare cortical motor planning and biomechanical stability during jump landings between participants with ACLR and healthy individuals.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingLaboratory.Patients or other participantsTen men with ACLR (age = 28 ± 4 years, time after surgery = 63 ± 35 months) and 17 healthy men (age = 28 ± 4 years) completed 43 ± 4 preplanned (landing leg shown before takeoff) and 51 ± 5 unplanned (visual cue during flight) countermovement jumps with single-legged landings.Main outcome measure(s)Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and frontal θ frequency power before the jump were analyzed using electroencephalography. Movement-related cortical potentials were subdivided into 3 successive 0.5-second time periods (readiness potential [RP]-1, RP-2, and negative slope [NS]) relative to movement onset, with higher values indicating more motor planning. Theta power was calculated for the last 0.5 second before movement onset, with higher values demonstrating more focused attention. Biomechanical landing stability was measured via peak vertical ground reaction force, time to stabilization, and center of pressure.ResultsBoth the ACLR and healthy groups evoked MRCPs at all 3 time periods. During the unplanned task analyzed using P values and Cohen d, the ACLR group exhibited slightly higher but not different MRCPs, achieving medium effect sizes (RP-1: P = .25, d = 0.44; RP-2: P = .20, d = 0.53; NS: P = .28, d = 0.47). The ACLR group also showed slightly higher θ power values that were not different during the preplanned (P = .18, d = 0.29) or unplanned (P = .42, d = 0.07) condition, achieving small effect sizes. The groups did not differ in their biomechanical outcomes (P values > .05). No condition × group interactions occurred (P values > .05).ConclusionsOur jump-landing task evoked MRCPs. Although not different between groups, the observed effect sizes provided the first indication that men with ACLR might have consistently relied on more cortical motor planning associated with unplanned jump landings. Confirmatory studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Project description:PurposeThe purpose was to assess if variation in sagittal plane landing kinematics is associated with variation in neuromuscular activation patterns of the quadriceps-hamstrings muscle groups during drop vertical jumps (DVJ).MethodsFifty female athletes performed three DVJ. The relationship between peak knee and hip flexion angles and the amplitude of four EMG vectors was investigated with trajectory-level canonical correlation analyses over the entire time period of the landing phase. EMG vectors consisted of the {vastus medialis(VM),vastus lateralis(VL)}, {vastus medialis(VM),hamstring medialis(HM)}, {hamstring medialis(HM),hamstring lateralis(HL)} and the {vastus lateralis(VL),hamstring lateralis(HL)}. To estimate the contribution of each individual muscle, linear regressions were also conducted using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping.ResultsThe peak knee flexion angle was significantly positively associated with the amplitudes of the {VM,HM} and {HM,HL} during the preparatory and initial contact phase and with the {VL,HL} vector during the peak loading phase (p<0.05). Small peak knee flexion angles were significantly associated with higher HM amplitudes during the preparatory and initial contact phase (p<0.001). The amplitudes of the {VM,VL} and {VL,HL} were significantly positively associated with the peak hip flexion angle during the peak loading phase (p<0.05). Small peak hip flexion angles were significantly associated with higher VL amplitudes during the peak loading phase (p = 0.001). Higher external knee abduction and flexion moments were found in participants landing with less flexed knee and hip joints (p<0.001).ConclusionThis study demonstrated clear associations between neuromuscular activation patterns and landing kinematics in the sagittal plane during specific parts of the landing. These findings have indicated that an erect landing pattern, characterized by less hip and knee flexion, was significantly associated with an increased medial and posterior neuromuscular activation (dominant hamstrings medialis activity) during the preparatory and initial contact phase and an increased lateral neuromuscular activation (dominant vastus lateralis activity) during the peak loading phase.

Project description:ContextIndividuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) exhibit impaired lower limb biomechanics during unilateral drop-jump landings on a flat surface. However, lower limb biomechanical adaptations during unilateral drop-jump landings on more challenging surfaces, such as those that are unstable or inclined, have not been described.ObjectiveTo determine how unilateral drop-jump landing surfaces (flat, unstable, and inclined) influence lower limb electromyography, kinematics, and kinetics in individuals with CAI.DesignDescriptive laboratory study.SettingBiomechanics laboratory.Patients or other participantsA total of 22 young adults (age = 24.9 ± 4.9 years, height = 1.68 ± 0.08 m, mass = 70.6 ± 11.4 kg) with CAI.Intervention(s)Participants completed 5 trials each of unilateral drop-jump landings on a flat surface (DROP), an unstable surface (FOAM), and a laterally inclined surface (WEDGE).Main outcome measure(s)Electromyography of the gluteus medius, vastus lateralis, gastrocnemius medialis, peroneus longus, and tibialis anterior muscles was recorded. Ankle and knee angles and moments were calculated using a 3-dimensional motion-analysis system and a force plate. Biomechanical variables were compared among tasks using 1-dimensional statistical nonparametric mapping.ResultsDuring DROP, greater ankle-dorsiflexion and knee-extension moments were observed than during FOAM and WEDGE and greater vastus lateralis muscle activity was observed than during FOAM. Greater ankle-inversion and plantar-flexion angles were noted during FOAM and WEDGE than during DROP. Peroneus longus muscle activity was greater during DROP than during FOAM. During FOAM, greater ankle-inversion and knee-extension angles and ankle-inversion and internal-rotation moments, as well as less peroneus longus muscle activity, were present than during WEDGE.ConclusionsThe greater ankle-inversion and plantar-flexion angles as well as the lack of increased peroneus longus muscle activation during the FOAM and WEDGE conditions could increase the risk of recurrent lateral ankle sprain in individuals with CAI. These findings improve our understanding of the changes in lower limb biomechanics when landing on more challenging surfaces and will help clinicians better target deficits associated with CAI during rehabilitation.

Project description:BACKGROUND:It is not known whether the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is susceptible to fatigue failure as a result of repetitive loading or whether certain knee morphologic characteristics increase that risk. HYPOTHESES:The number of knee loading cycles required to fail an ACL by fatigue failure is unaffected by the magnitude of the external load delivered to the knee joint. Furthermore, sex, ACL cross-sectional area, and lateral tibial slope will not affect the number of loading cycles to ACL failure. STUDY DESIGN:Controlled laboratory study. METHODS:Knee pairs from 10 cadaveric donors (5 female) of similar age, height, and weight were imaged with 3-T magnetic resonance imaging to measure lateral tibial slope and ACL cross-sectional area. One knee from each pair was then subjected to repeated application of a load of 3 times body weight (3*BW), while the other knee was subjected to a 4*BW load, both involving impulsive compression force, knee flexion moment, and internal tibial torque combined with realistic trans-knee muscle forces. The resulting 3-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics and kinetics were recorded, along with ACL relative strain and quadriceps, hamstring, and gastrocnemius muscle forces. The loading cycle was repeated until the ACL ruptured, a 3-mm increase in cumulative anterior tibial translation occurred, or a minimum of 50 trials was reached. RESULTS:Eight of 10 knees failed under the 4*BW load (mean ± SD cycles to failure, 21 ± 18), while 5 of 10 knees failed under the 3*BW load (mean ± SD cycles to failure, 52 ± 10). Four knees exhibited a 3-mm increase in anterior tibial translation, 7 knees developed partial or complete visible ACL tears, and 2 knees developed complete ACL tibial avulsions. A Cox regression showed that the number of cycles to ACL failure was influenced by the simulated landing force (P = .012) and ACL cross-sectional area (P = .022). Donor sex and lateral tibial slope did not influence the number of cycles to ACL failure. CONCLUSION:The human ACL is susceptible to fatigue failure when pivot landings of 3*BW or more load the knee repeatedly within a short time span. An ACL with a smaller cross-sectional area is at greater risk for this type of failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:The results show that the human knee can only withstand a certain number of 3*BW or greater jump loading cycles within a short time period before the ACL will fail. Therefore, limiting the increase in the number and severity of pivot landing maneuvers performed over a week of training would make sense from an injury prevention viewpoint.

Project description:CONTEXT:? Despite an increase in the literature, few definitive guidelines are available to determine when an athlete has been fully rehabilitated after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). OBJECTIVE:? To examine countermovement jump and isokinetic dynamometry measures to (1) identify which measures can best distinguish between ACLR and control participants and (2) provide normative values for identified measures in young adult male multidirectional field-sport athletes. DESIGN:? Cross-sectional study. SETTING:? Orthopaedic hospital. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS:? Young adult male multidirectional field-sport athletes (n = 118) who had undergone unilateral patellar-tendon graft ACLR at least 6 months earlier and healthy male participants (n = 44) with no previous knee injury. INTERVENTION(S):? Single-legged countermovement jump (SL CMJ). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):? Three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the SL CMJ and mean peak concentric knee-extension and -flexion torque using isokinetic dynamometry (ISO) were compared in the 2 groups. A stepwise logistic regression was carried out to identify the best predictors of ACLR- or control-group membership (SL CMJ height, limb symmetry index, peak power, joint power contribution, ISO peak torque, limb symmetry index variables). RESULTS:? The control group differed strongly from the ACLR group in isokinetic knee-extension peak torque (d = -1.33), SL CMJ performance (d > 0.4), and limb symmetry measures in both ISO and jump outcomes (d > 1.1). The combination of measures from both ISO and SL CMJ identified group membership with an accuracy of 89%. CONCLUSIONS:? Rehabilitation of ACLR patients may be complete when they achieve isokinetic knee-extension peak torque of 260% (±40%) body mass, SL CMJ performance of >17 cm (±4 cm), and reach-limb symmetry measures of >90% in both strength and jump outcomes. The outcomes in the control group can inform return-to-play criteria for young adult male multidirectional field-sport athletes after ACLR.

Project description:The purpose of this study was to determine whether fear of re-injury is manifested in joint kinematics and muscle activation patterns during landings of a standardized rebound side-hop (SRSH), or in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), among individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). In this cross-sectional observational study, 38 individuals within 2 years post-ACLR were grouped into HIGH-FEAR (n = 21, median 11.2 months post-surgery) or LOW-FEAR (n = 17, median 10.1 months post-surgery) based on a discriminating question (Q9; Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17). These individuals and 39 asymptomatic controls performed the SRSH. Three-dimensional motion recordings were used to calculate trunk, hip, and knee joint angles at initial contact and range of respective joint motion during landing. Surface electromyography registered mean amplitudes and co-contraction indexes for thigh muscles during pre-activation (50 ms) and landing phases. PROMs of knee function, knee health, and physical activity were also analyzed. The HIGH-FEAR and LOW-FEAR classification was corroborated by distinct Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17 total and subscale scores and revealed distinguishable muscle activation patterns. HIGH-FEAR demonstrated higher biceps femoris electromyography amplitude and higher anterior-posterior co-contraction index during landing than both LOW-FEAR and controls. However, there were no fear-related differences for kinematics or PROMs. Instead, both ACLR subgroups showed different kinematics at initial contact to controls; HIGH-FEAR with more trunk, hip, and knee flexion, and LOW-FEAR with more hip and knee flexion. Individuals with ACLR who had high fear of re-injury seem to have adopted a protective strategy with higher muscular activation patterns, presumably to stabilize the knee joint, compared with individuals with low fear of re-injury and controls. SRSH landing kinematics or knee-related PROMs may not be as sensitive to fear of re-injury. Fear of reinjury following anterior cruciate ligament injury should be evaluated as an independent psychological outcome throughout rehabilitation after ACLR for improved return to sport transition. If you have an anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with reconstructive surgery, you might have a high fear of reinjury, and that can change how you activate the muscles around your knee. Your physical therapist can do a simple screening test in addition to functional tests to help reduce your fear and improve your treatment outcomes.

Dataset Information

Kinematic analyses including finite helical axes of drop jump landings demonstrate decreased knee control long after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Publications

Kinematic analyses including finite helical axes of drop jump landings demonstrate decreased knee control long after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets