Dataset Information

Reports of Injury Risks and Reasons for Choice of Sleep Environments for Infants and Toddlers.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Compare mothers' reports of injuries for infants and toddlers sleeping with crib-bumpers/mesh-liners/no-barriers and reasons for these sleep environment choices. METHODS:A cross-sectional survey of mothers subscribing to a parenting magazine and using crib bumpers (n?=?224), mesh liners (n?=?262), and no barriers (n?=?842). Analyses of four possible injuries (face-covered, climb-out/fall, slat-entrapment, hit-head) including multivariate logistic regression adjusted for missing data/demographics and Chi squared analyses of reasons for mothers' choices. RESULTS:Maternal reports of finding infants/toddlers with face covered had 3.5 times higher adjusted odds (aOR) for crib bumper versus mesh liner use. Breathing difficulties and wedgings were reported for infants/toddlers using crib bumpers but not mesh liners. Climb-outs/falls showed no significant difference in aORs for crib bumpers versus no-barriers and mesh liners versus no barriers. Reports of slat-entrapment were less likely for mothers using crib bumpers and mesh liners than using no barrier (aOR?=?.28 and .32). Reports of hit-heads were less likely for crib bumpers vs no barrier (aOR?=?.38) with no significant difference between mesh liners versus no barrier use. Mothers using crib bumpers and mesh liners felt their choice prevented slat-entrapment (89%, 91%); 93.5% of crib bumper users felt their choice prevented hit-heads. Significantly more mesh liner than crib bumper users chose them because "There is no suffocation risk" (64.1% vs. 40.6%), while 83.6% of no-barrier users chose them because "I was concerned about suffocation risk." CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE:Mothers appeared to be more concerned about preventing minor risks than suffocation. Understanding reasons for mothers' use of barriers/no-barriers is important in tailoring counseling for mothers with infants/toddlers.

SUBMITTER: Scheers NJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6823298 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reports of Injury Risks and Reasons for Choice of Sleep Environments for Infants and Toddlers.

Scheers N J NJ Dayton Chauncey C Batcher Mary M Thach Bradley T BT

Maternal and child health journal 20191201 12

<h4>Objective</h4>Compare mothers' reports of injuries for infants and toddlers sleeping with crib-bumpers/mesh-liners/no-barriers and reasons for these sleep environment choices.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional survey of mothers subscribing to a parenting magazine and using crib bumpers (n = 224), mesh liners (n = 262), and no barriers (n = 842). Analyses of four possible injuries (face-covered, climb-out/fall, slat-entrapment, hit-head) including multivariate logistic regression adjusted for ...[more]

PMID: 31250240

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAmong children, infants and toddlers have some of the highest rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI), but longitudinal information on their developmental outcomes to guide postinjury surveillance is sparse.ObjectiveTo evaluate infants' and toddlers' development over 3 years following TBI compared with those with orthopedic injury (OI).Design, setting, and participantsA longitudinal observational cohort study was conducted at 2 level 1 pediatric trauma centers from January 20, 2013, to September 30, 2015; data analysis was performed from May 12 to October 20, 2021. Participants included children injured when younger than 31 months with TBI or OI who received emergency department care.ExposuresMild, moderate, or severe TBI or OI.Main outcomes and measuresParents completed baseline measures representing preinjury status and 3-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month postinjury status, using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ-3), with a mean reference value of 50 and higher scores indicating more advanced development. Linear mixed models characterized children's outcomes for each ASQ-3 domain after adjustment for baseline ASQ-3, injury severity and group, age, injury mechanism (abuse or not), sex, prematurity, family function, social capital, and time. Interactions with time were evaluated.ResultsConsent for participation was provided for 195 children; 184 parents (94%) completed a baseline survey. The cohort included 168 children who completed at least 1 follow-up survey: 48 (29%) mild; 54 (32%) complicated mild/moderate; 21 (13%) severe TBI; and 45 (27%) orthopedic injury. The cohort included 95 boys (57%), 49% injured before age 1 year; and 13% injured by abuse. Mean (SD) age at the time of injury was 13.9 (9.4) months. At 36 months, children with mild or complicated mild/moderate TBI performed similarly to children with OI across ASQ-3 domains. Children with severe TBI performed poorly as shown by negative mean differences in communication (-8.8; 95% CI, -13.8 to -3.8); gross motor (-10.1; 95% CI, -15.1 to -5.1); problem solving (-6.6; 95% CI, -11.2 to -1.9), and personal social (-6.3; 95% CI, -10.4 to -2.1) domains with little recovery over time. Children with abusive injury experienced decrements in ability over time in fine motor and personal social skills. Social capital was protective in communication (mean, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.3-2.7) and problem solving (mean, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.1-2.3) domains.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of children with TBI, children with severe injury showed little recovery. These findings suggest that early childhood intervention is needed, while children with milder injury remained on their developmental track and should continue routine developmental surveillance.

Project description:STUDY OBJECTIVES:To examine the prevalence and correlates of nighttime awakenings and to explore the association between sleep and cognitive development in a community sample of infants and toddlers. METHODS:A total of 590 healthy infants (aged 2-11 months) and 512 toddlers (aged 12-30 months) from 8 provinces of China were assessed for their sleep and cognitive development. Data on sleep duration and nighttime awakenings were collected through the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire. Cognitive development was assessed by trained pediatricians using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. RESULTS:Prevalence of no nighttime awakening, and nighttime awakening(s) for 1×/night, 2×/night, and ≥ 3×/night was 6.8%, 20.2%, 33.2%, and 39.3% in infants, and was 25.8%, 34.6%, 23.8%, and 15.8% in toddlers, respectively. Nighttime awakenings were generally associated with younger age, lower maternal education level, and being currently breastfed. In addition, nighttime awakenings were associated with being boys in toddlers. After controlling for potential confounders, infants with nighttime awakenings for 2×/night were found to have significantly higher Mental Development Index (MDI) score, as compared to those without and those with more frequent nighttime awakenings. However, toddlers with nighttime awakenings for ≥ 3×/night had significantly lower MDI, as compared to those with fewer nighttime awakenings. Total sleep duration was not associated with any developmental indices in both infants and toddlers. CONCLUSIONS:Frequent nighttime awakenings are associated with poor cognitive functions in toddlers. Meanwhile, a nonlinear association between nighttime awakenings and cognitive performance was found among infants. The findings provide a developmental context for the effect of sleep on cognitive abilities in young children. Further longitudinal studies and interventional studies on the effects of parent-based sleep-focused intervention on cognitive abilities among young children are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundThe prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes continues to increase. These conditions disproportionately affect minorities and are associated with poor nutrition early in life. Current food-consumption patterns can inform pending dietary guidelines for infants and toddlers.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to describe infant feeding, complementary feeding, and food and beverage consumption patterns of 0- to 23.9-mo-olds in the general population.MethodsThe Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study 2016 is a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of children aged <4 y. Dietary data were collected from a national random sample by using a 24-h dietary recall (n = 3235). The percentage of children consuming foods from >400 food groups was calculated. Differences in the percentage consuming between Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, and non-Hispanic black children aged 0-23.9 mo were evaluated with the use of ORs and 95% CIs.ResultsEighty-three percent of 0- to 23.9-mo-olds (n = 2635) were ever breastfed, 34% of 0- to 3.9-mo-olds (n = 305) and 15% of 4- to 5.9-mo-olds (n = 295) were exclusively breastfed, and 24% of 12- to 14.9-mo-olds (n = 412) consumed breast milk on the day of the recall. Complementary foods were more likely to be introduced before 4 mo in formula-fed infants (27%) than in infants who did not consume formula (5%). Half of 4- to 5.9-mo-olds consumed iron-fortified infant cereal, but few consumed iron-rich meats. Among toddlers (12-23.9 mo; n = 1133), >20% consumed no servings of fruit or vegetables on the day of the recall, approximately half consumed 100% fruit juice, and one-quarter to one-third consumed a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB).ConclusionsBreastfeeding initiation and duration have improved, but exclusivity remains low. Low consumption of iron-rich foods, fruit, and vegetables and lack of variety in vegetable consumption are problems. Efforts to reduce the consumption of SSBs and 100% fruit juice are warranted in early childhood.

Project description:BackgroundMany updates to young child feeding recommendations have been published over the past decade, but concurrent intake trends have not been assessed.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate adequacy and trends in energy and nutrient intakes of US infants and children aged 0-47.9 mo through use of Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (FITS) data from 2002, 2008, and 2016.MethodsFITS are cross-sectional surveys of parents/caregivers of infants and young children (FITS 2002, n = 2962; FITS 2008, n = 3276; FITS 2016, n = 3235). Dietary intakes were assessed by telephone with trained interviewers using the Nutrition Data System for Research. Mean ± SE nutrient intakes were calculated. Diet adequacy was assessed with the nutrient adequacy ratio (NAR) for 17 nutrients and the corresponding mean adequacy ratio.ResultsEnergy and macronutrient intakes were generally stable across surveys, but significant decreases for saturated fat and total sugars and an increase in fiber were observed among 6-11.9-mo-olds and 12-23.9-mo-olds (P-trend < 0.0001). Mean sodium intakes exceeded Adequate Intakes (AI) for all ages, whereas fiber intakes were universally below the AI. Nutrients with the lowest NAR values were vitamin D (range 0.41-0.67/1.00) and vitamin E (range 0.60-0.79/1.00 for 2008 and 2016). For iron, infants aged 6-11.9 mo had the lowest NAR values at 0.77-0.88/1.00, compared to 0.85-0.89/1.00 for 12-47.9-mo-olds. Potassium was low from 12 to 47.9 mo (NAR range 0.55-0.63/1.00 across survey years). The nutrients with the greatest decline in mean intakes were iron and vitamins D and E among 6-11.9-mo-olds, and vitamin D and potassium among 12-23.9-mo-olds in 2016 compared to 2002.ConclusionsThe diets of US infants and young children were generally adequate for most micronutrients and stable over time, but sodium intakes were too high, and nutrient gaps still existed, especially for vitamins D, E, and fiber across ages and for iron among infants.

Dataset Information

Reports of Injury Risks and Reasons for Choice of Sleep Environments for Infants and Toddlers.

Publications

Reports of Injury Risks and Reasons for Choice of Sleep Environments for Infants and Toddlers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets