Dataset Information

Validation of a New Physical Activity Instrument Against Pedometers Among Dialysis Patients.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE(S):The newly developed Low Physical Activity Questionnaire (LoPAQ) was designed to capture the low activity level among typically sedentary patients undergoing dialysis and correlated well with a physical activity questionnaire used in the general population. However, this instrument has not been validated against a more objective measure. METHODS:We recruited patients receiving dialysis for ?3 months from 3 dialysis facilities in San Francisco. Spontaneous walking activity was measured by pedometers over 7 days including a weekend and used as the standard reference. Patients were instructed to record their activities and step count readings. Study coordinators administered the LoPAQ during a dialysis session (hemodialysis [HD]) or clinic visit (peritoneal dialysis [PD]). The LoPAQ ascertains time and energy expended in walking activity, as well as light, moderate, and vigorous activity, and total physical activity during a 1-week recall period with 11 simple questions and requires approximately 10 minutes to administer. The LoPAQ also asks about time spent in sitting activities over 1 week. Spearman correlation was used to determine whether the LoPAQ results correlate with step counts. RESULTS:Sixty dialysis patients (HD = 48, PD = 12) completed the LoPAQ and wore a pedometer for 1 week. Mean age was 58.0 ± 12.7 years, 78.3% were men, and median dialysis vintage was 3.1 (IQR, 1.1-5.8) years. Median step count was 2,630.5 (1,270.7-5,137) steps/day. Most patients (82.8%) reported walking activity around the neighborhood, for transportation, and/or for fitness or pleasure, with a median of 595 (70-1,566.3) kcal/week. Total kilocalories per week of physical activity reported on the LoPAQ were 655 (422.8-2,336.8). Participants reported an average of 5 (3-8) sedentary hours per day. Energy expenditure in walking by the LoPAQ was highly correlated with weekly step counts (rho = 0.53, P < .001). In addition, the overall activity reported on the LoPAQ correlated with weekly pedometer readings (rho = 0.35, P = .01) and did not differ between HD and PD patients. CONCLUSIONS:The LoPAQ was easier and less time-consuming than previously validated physical activity questionnaires. LoPAQ demonstrated a good correlation with objective pedometer step counts among dialysis patients, similar to other physical activity instruments used in healthier and more active populations.

SUBMITTER: Kittiskulnam P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6825523 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Validation of a New Physical Activity Instrument Against Pedometers Among Dialysis Patients.

Kittiskulnam Piyawan P Sheshadri Anoop A Johansen Kirsten L KL

Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation 20190508 6

<h4>Objective(s)</h4>The newly developed Low Physical Activity Questionnaire (LoPAQ) was designed to capture the low activity level among typically sedentary patients undergoing dialysis and correlated well with a physical activity questionnaire used in the general population. However, this instrument has not been validated against a more objective measure.<h4>Methods</h4>We recruited patients receiving dialysis for ≥3 months from 3 dialysis facilities in San Francisco. Spontaneous walking activ ...[more]

PMID: 31078404

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundExercise has been shown to be of benefit in the general population and in patients with chronic diseases. Despite a lack of compelling evidence, patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) are often discouraged from participating in exercise programs that include weight lifting due to concerns about the development of hernias and leaks. The actual effects of physical activity with or without structured exercise programs for patients on PD remain unclear.ObjectiveTo determine the risks and benefits of physical activity in the ESKD population treated with PD.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.SettingIncluded all studies that met our criteria regardless of country of origin.PatientsAdult patients with ESKD treated with PD.MeasurementsDescriptive and quantitative analysis of our primary and secondary outcome variables.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for observational and interventional studies examining the effects of physical activity in patients on PD. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of the identified studies. The primary outcomes of interest included patient-centered outcomes of mental health, physical functioning, fatigue, quality of life, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included nutritional measures, lipid profile, blood pressure changes, maximum heart rate, resting heart rate, maximal oxygen consumption, muscle development, cognitive function, and markers of inflammation.ResultsOf 1828 studies identified by the literature search, 12 met the inclusion criteria including 6 interventional and 6 observational studies. There was limited information on the patient important outcomes. However, there is some evidence for improvements in burden of kidney disease, physical function, and some mental health measures with physical activity.LimitationsLack of well-designed randomized controlled trials impaired our ability to determine the benefits and risks of increasing physical activity.ConclusionsThere is limited evidence of benefit with increased levels of physical activity in PD patients. Further research is needed to define the exercise program that is likely to be of most benefit to patients treated with PD.

Project description:Background:In order to investigate the impact of adherence to recommendations of physical activity and sedentary time on health outcomes in clinical trials, there is a need for feasible tools such as questionnaires that can give representative estimates of these measures. The primary aim of the present study was to validate two such questionnaires and their ability to estimate adherence to the recommendations of physical activity defined as moderate-to- vigorous physical activity or moderate physical activity of at least 150 min/week in colorectal cancer patients. Secondarily, self-reported sedentary time from the HUNT-PAQ was also evaluated. Methods:Participants from 'The Norwegian dietary guidelines and colorectal cancer survival-study' (CRC-NORDIET study) completed two short questionnaires; the NORDIET-FFQ (n = 78) and the HUNT-PAQ (n = 77). The physical activity monitor SenseWear Armband Mini was used as the reference method during seven consecutive days. Results:The NORDIET-FFQ provided better estimates of time in moderate-to- vigorous physical activity and moderate physical activity than the HUNT-PAQ. The NORDIET-FFQ was unable to rank individual time in moderate-to- vigorous physical activity and moderate physical activity (Spearman's rho = 0.08, p = 0.509 and Spearman's rho rho = 0.01, p = 0.402, respectively). All intensities were under-reported by the HUNT-PAQ, but ranking of individual time in moderate physical activity and sedentary time were acceptable among women only (Spearman's rho = 0.37, p = 0.027 and Spearman's rho = 0.36, p = 0.035, respectively). The HUNT-PAQ correctly classified 71% of those not meeting the recommendations (sensitivity), and the NORDIET-FFQ correctly classified 63% of those who met the recommendations (specificity). About 67% and 33% reported to meet the recommendation of moderate-to- vigorous physical activity with the NORDIET-FFQ and HUNT-PAQ, respectively, whereas 55% actually met the moderate-to- vigorous physical activity according to the SenseWear Armband Mini. Conclusions:The NORDIET-FFQ provided better specificity and better estimates of PA than the HUNT-PAQ. The HUNT-PAQ provided better sensitivity, and provided better ranking of PA and sedentary time among women than NORDIET-FFQ. It is important to be aware of the limitations documented in the present study. Trial registration:The study is registered on the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials (Identifier: NCT01570010). Registered 4 April 2012.

Dataset Information

Validation of a New Physical Activity Instrument Against Pedometers Among Dialysis Patients.

Publications

Validation of a New Physical Activity Instrument Against Pedometers Among Dialysis Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure