Dataset Information

Metabolic effects of dopamine agonists in patients with prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: Objectives:Recent large cohort studies suggest an association between high plasma prolactin and cardiovascular mortality. The objective of this systematic review was to systematically assess the effect of reducing prolactin with dopamine agonist on established cardiovascular risk factors in patients with prolactinomas. Design:Bibliographical search was done until February 2019 searching the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, WHO and LILAC. Eligible studies had to include participants with verified prolactinomas where metabolic variables were assessed before and after at least 2 weeks treatment with dopamine agonists. Methods:Baseline data and outcomes were independently collected by two investigators. The study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42016046525). Results:Fourteen observational studies enrolling 387 participants were included. The pooled standardized mean difference of the primary outcome revealed a reduction of BMI and weight of -0.21 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.05; P = 0.01; I2 = 71%), after treatment. Subgroup analysis suggested that the reduction of weight was primarily driven by studies with high prolactin levels at baseline (P = 0.04). Secondary outcomes suggested a small decrease in waist circumference, a small-to-moderate decrease in triglycerides, fasting glucose levels, HOMA-IR, HbA1c and hsCRP, and a moderate decrease in LDL, total cholesterol and insulin. Conclusion:This systematic review suggests a reduction of weight as well as an improved lipid profile and glucose tolerance after treatment with dopamine agonist in patients with prolactinomas. These data are based on low-quality evidence.

SUBMITTER: Byberg S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6826167 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Metabolic effects of dopamine agonists in patients with prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Byberg Sarah S Futtrup Jesper J Andreassen Mikkel M Krogh Jesper J

Endocrine connections 20191001 10

<h4>Objectives</h4>Recent large cohort studies suggest an association between high plasma prolactin and cardiovascular mortality. The objective of this systematic review was to systematically assess the effect of reducing prolactin with dopamine agonist on established cardiovascular risk factors in patients with prolactinomas.<h4>Design</h4>Bibliographical search was done until February 2019 searching the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, WHO and LILAC. Eligible studies had to include partici ...[more]

PMID: 31518995

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFor prolactinoma patients, dopamine agonists (DAs) are indicated as the first-line treatment and surgery is an adjunctive choice. However, with the development of surgical technique and equipment, the effect of surgery has improved. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of surgery versus DAs in patients with different types of prolactinomas.MethodsA systematic search of literature using Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trial databases was conducted until July 12, 2019. Prolactinoma patients treated with DAs (bromocriptine or cabergoline) or surgery (microscopic or endoscopic surgery) were included. Outcomes included the biochemical cure rate, recurrence rate, prolactin level, improvement rates of symptoms, and incidence rates of complications. A random-effects model was used to pool the extracted data. Qualitative comparisons were conducted instead of quantitative comparison.ResultsDAs were better than surgery in terms of the biochemical cure rate (0.78 versus 0.66), but surgery had a much lower recurrence rate (0.19 versus 0.57). Full advantages were not demonstrated in improvement rates of symptoms and incidence rates of complications with both treatment options. In microprolactinoma patients, the biochemical cure rate of endoscopic surgery was equal to the average cure rate of DAs (0.86 versus 0.86) and it surpassed the biochemical cure rate of bromocriptine (0.86 versus 0.76). In macroprolactinoma patients, endoscopic surgery was slightly higher than bromocriptine (0.66 versus 0.64) in terms of the biochemical cure rate.ConclusionFor patients with clear indications or contraindications for surgery, choosing surgery or DAs accordingly is unequivocal. However, for patients with clinical equipoise, such as surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, in microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma patients, we suggest that neurosurgeons and endocrinologists conduct high-quality clinical trials to address the clinical equipoise quantitatively.

Project description:BackgroundTo evaluate the effect of lifestyle modifications on metabolic syndrome (MetS) as assessed by its resolution and improved values for its components.MethodsThis was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Searches were performed of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database from January 1966 to October 2011 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the study objective. The included studies were RCTs restricted to the English language, with a follow-up period of 6 months or more, which reported overall resolution of MetS or values of MetS components (fasting blood glucose, waist circumference, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP)). Two investigators independently assessed study eligibility. The effect sizes were the relative proportion of patients with resolved MetS and mean differences in MetS component values from baseline to 1-year follow-up in a lifestyle-modification intervention (LMI) group versus a control (conventional lifestyle education or no treatment) group. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model.ResultsEleven interventions in eight RCTs were used for the meta-analyses. The relative proportion of patients with resolved MetS in the intervention group was approximately 2.0 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.7) times greater in the intervention group compared with the control group (7 interventions, n = 2.839). LMI (5 interventions, n = 748) significantly reduced mean values for SBP by -6.4 mmHg (95% CI -9.7 to -3.2), DBP by -3.3 mmHg (95% CI -5.2 to -1.4), triglycerides by -12.0 mg/dl (95% CI -22.2 to -1.7), waist circumference by -2.7 cm (95% CI -4.6 to -0.9), and fasting blood glucose by -11.5 mg/dl (95% CI -22.4 to -0.6) (5 interventions), but reductions were not significant for HDL (1.3 mg/dl; 95% CI -0.6 to 3.1).ConclusionsThe LMI was effective in resolving MetS and reducing the severity of related abnormalities (fasting blood glucose, waist circumference, SBP and DBP, and triglycerides) in subjects with MetS.

Project description:BackgroundNon-ergot dopamine agonists (NEDAs) have been used as monotherapy or as an adjunctive therapy to levodopa for many years. Novel long-acting formulations of NEDAs including pramipexole extended-release (ER), ropinirole prolonged-release (PR), and rotigotine transdermal patch have been developed. However, there is no strong evidence that a given NEDA is more potent than another. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of six commonly used NEDAs in early Parkinson's disease (PD).MethodsSix NEDAs including piribedil, rotigotine transdermal patch, pramipexole immediate-release (IR)/ER, and ropinirole IR/PR were investigated. The efficacy outcomes including Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities in daily life (UPDRS-II), motor function (UPDRS-III), and their subtotal (UPDRS-II + III), tolerability and safety outcomes were analyzed.ResultsA total of 20 RCTs (5,355 patients) were included in the current study. The result indicated that compared with placebo, all six investigated drugs had statistically significant differences in the improvement of UPDRS-II, UPDRS-III, and UPDRS-II + III (except ropinirole PR in UPDRS-II). There were no statistically significant differences between six NEDAs for the UPDRS-II and UPDRS-III. For UPDRS-II + III, the improvement of ropinirole IR/PR and piribedil were higher than that of rotigotine transdermal patch, and piribedil was higher than that of pramipexole IR. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that piribedil resulted in best improvement in UPDRS-II and UPDRS-III (0.717 and 0.861, respectively). For UPDRS-II + III, piribedil and ropinirole PR exhibited similar improvement and both had high rates (0.858 and 0.878, respectively). Furthermore, piribedil performed better as monotherapy, ranking first in the improvement of UPDRS-II, III, and II + III (0.922, 0.960, and 0.941, separately). With regard to tolerability, there was a significant increase in overall withdrawals with pramipexole ER (0.937). In addition, the incidence of adverse reaction of ropinirole IR was relatively high (nausea: 0.678; somnolence: 0.752; dizziness: 0.758; fatigue: 0.890).ConclusionsIn this systematic review and network meta-analysis of six NEDAs, piribedil exhibited better efficacy, especially as monotherapy, and ropinirole IR was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events in patients with early PD.

Project description:Background and objectivesMetabolic acidosis is associated with progression of CKD and has significant adverse effects on muscle and bone. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the benefits and risks of metabolic acidosis treatment with oral alkali supplementation or a reduction of dietary acid intake in those with CKD.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsMEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for relevant trials in patients with stage 3-5 CKD and metabolic acidosis (<22 mEq/L) or low-normal serum bicarbonate (22-24 mEq/L). Data were pooled in a meta-analysis with results expressed as weighted mean difference for continuous outcomes and relative risk for categorical outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), using a random effects model. Study quality and strength of evidence were assessed using Cochrane risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.ResultsFourteen clinical trials were included (n=1394 participants). Treatment of metabolic acidosis with oral alkali supplementation or a reduction of dietary acid intake increased serum bicarbonate levels (14 studies, 1378 patients, mean difference 3.33 mEq/L, 95% CI, 2.37 to 4.29) and resulted in a slower decline in eGFR (13 studies, 1329 patients, mean difference -3.28 ml/min per 1.73 m2, 95% CI, -4.42 to -2.14; moderate certainty) and a reduction in urinary albumin excretion (very-low certainty), along with a reduction in the risk of progression to ESKD (relative risk, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.56; low certainty). Oral alkali supplementation was associated with worsening hypertension or the requirement for increased antihypertensive therapy (very-low certainty).ConclusionsLow-to-moderate certainty evidence suggest that oral alkali supplementation or a reduction in dietary acid intake may slow the rate of kidney function decline and potentially reduce the risk of ESKD in patients with CKD and metabolic acidosis.

Dataset Information

Metabolic effects of dopamine agonists in patients with prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publications

Metabolic effects of dopamine agonists in patients with prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets