Dataset Information

PRe-hospital Evaluation of Sensitive TrOponin (PRESTO) Study: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study protocol.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Within the UK, chest pain is one of the most common reasons for emergency (999) ambulance calls and the most common reason for emergency hospital admission. Diagnosing acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in a patient with chest pain in the prehospital setting by a paramedic is challenging. The Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision rule is a validated tool used in the emergency department (ED) to stratify patients with suspected ACS following a single blood test.We are seeking to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the T-MACS decision aid algorithm to 'rule out' ACS when used in the prehospital environment with point-of-care troponin assays. If successful, this could allow paramedics to immediately rule out ACS for patients in the 'very low risk' group and avoid the need for transport to the ED, while also risk stratifying other patients using a single blood sample taken in the prehospital setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:We will recruit patients who call emergency (999) ambulance services where the responding paramedic suspects cardiac chest pain. The data required to apply T-MACS will be prospectively recorded by paramedics who are responding to each patient. Paramedics will be required to draw a venous blood sample at the time of arrival to the patient. Blood samples will later be tested in batches for cardiac troponin, using commercially available troponin assays. The primary outcome will be a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, established at the time of initial hospital admission. The secondary outcomes will include any major adverse cardiac events within 30 days of enrolment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The study obtained approval from the National Research Ethics Service (reference: 18/ES/0101) and the Health Research Authority. We will publish our findings in a high impact general medical journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, study ID: NCT03561051.

SUBMITTER: Alghamdi A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6830682 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

PRe-hospital Evaluation of Sensitive TrOponin (PRESTO) Study: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study protocol.

Alghamdi Abdulrhman A Cook Eloïse E Carlton Edward E Siriwardena Aloysius A Hann Mark M Thompson Alexander A Foulkes Angela A Phillips John J Cooper Jamie J Bell Steve S Kirby Kim K Rosser Andy A Body Richard R

BMJ open 20191028 10

<h4>Introduction</h4>Within the UK, chest pain is one of the most common reasons for emergency (999) ambulance calls and the most common reason for emergency hospital admission. Diagnosing acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in a patient with chest pain in the prehospital setting by a paramedic is challenging. The Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision rule is a validated tool used in the emergency department (ED) to stratify patients with suspected ACS following a single ...[more]

PMID: 31662404

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is promising for diagnosing asthma and could replace bronchial provocation (BP). To date, cut-off values have been derived by post hoc analysis only. The aim was to validate the diagnostic accuracy for predefined FeNO cut-off values and the predictive value for responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).MethodsWe conducted a prospective, diagnostic, multicentre study with patients attending three private practices of pneumologists in Upper Bavaria, Germany, from July 3, 2020 to Jan 21, 2022. Index test was FENO measurement. Reference standard was Tiffeneau ratio (FEV1/VC) or airway resistance as assessed by whole body plethysmography, with additional BP or bronchodilation test. Follow-up was performed after 12 weeks. Analyses of Receiver Operating Characteristics curves were conducted to determine the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of FeNO.Findings308 patients with complete follow-up were recruited, 186 (60·4%) were female, average age was 44·7 years, 161 (52·3%) had asthma. Regarding diagnostic accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0·718 (95% CI 0·661-0·775; p < 0·001). Sensitivity at FeNO >50 ppb was 0·24 (95% CI 0·18-0·32), specificity 0·99 (0·95-1·0), positive predictive value (PPV) 0·95 (0·84-0·99), negative predictive value (NPV) 0·54 (0·48-0·60). In 66 patients with ´wheezing´ and ´allergic rhinitis´, the sensitivity at FeNO >33 ppb was 0·49 (0·34-0·64), specificity 0·88 (0·64-0·99), PPV 0·92 (0·75-0·99), NPV 0·38 (0·23-0·54). In 68 patients with ICS medication, responsiveness was predicted at the cut-off >43 ppb, with a sensitivity of 0·55 (95%CI 0·36-0·74), specificity 0·82 (0·66-0·92), PPV 0·70 (0·47-0·87), NPV 0·71 (0·56-0·84).InterpretationFeNO measurement allows a valid ruling-in of an asthma diagnosis, whereas ruling-out of asthma is not possible. Enhanced probability of ICS responsiveness is also given with increased FeNO values.FundingCircassia Germany gave 25% discount on the purchase of three NIOX VERO devices.

Project description:BackgroundThe Xpert MTB/RIF assay is an automated molecular test that has improved the detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance, but its sensitivity is inadequate in patients with paucibacillary disease or HIV. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) was developed to overcome this limitation. We compared the diagnostic performance of Xpert Ultra with that of Xpert for detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance.MethodsIn this prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy study, we recruited adults with pulmonary tuberculosis symptoms presenting at primary health-care centres and hospitals in eight countries (South Africa, Uganda, Kenya, India, China, Georgia, Belarus, and Brazil). Participants were allocated to the case detection group if no drugs had been taken for tuberculosis in the past 6 months or to the multidrug-resistance risk group if drugs for tuberculosis had been taken in the past 6 months, but drug resistance was suspected. Demographic information, medical history, chest imaging results, and HIV test results were recorded at enrolment, and each participant gave at least three sputum specimen on 2 separate days. Xpert and Xpert Ultra diagnostic performance in the same sputum specimen was compared with culture tests and drug susceptibility testing as reference standards. The primary objectives were to estimate and compare the sensitivity of Xpert Ultra test with that of Xpert for detection of smear-negative tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance and to estimate and compare Xpert Ultra and Xpert specificities for detection of rifampicin resistance. Study participants in the case detection group were included in all analyses, whereas participants in the multidrug-resistance risk group were only included in analyses of rifampicin-resistance detection.FindingsBetween Feb 18, and Dec 24, 2016, we enrolled 2368 participants for sputum sampling. 248 participants were excluded from the analysis, and 1753 participants were distributed to the case detection group (n=1439) and the multidrug-resistance risk group (n=314). Sensitivities of Xpert Ultra and Xpert were 63% and 46%, respectively, for the 137 participants with smear-negative and culture-positive sputum (difference of 17%, 95% CI 10 to 24); 90% and 77%, respectively, for the 115 HIV-positive participants with culture-positive sputum (13%, 6·4 to 21); and 88% and 83%, respectively, across all 462 participants with culture-positive sputum (5·4%, 3·3 to 8·0). Specificities of Xpert Ultra and Xpert for case detection were 96% and 98% (-2·7%, -3·9 to -1·7) overall, and 93% and 98% for patients with a history of tuberculosis. Xpert Ultra and Xpert performed similarly in detecting rifampicin resistance.InterpretationFor tuberculosis case detection, sensitivity of Xpert Ultra was superior to that of Xpert in patients with paucibacillary disease and in patients with HIV. However, this increase in sensitivity came at the expense of a decrease in specificity.FundingGovernment of Netherlands, Government of Australia, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Government of the UK, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Project description:BackgroundDelirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 'A's Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com ) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. The secondary objective was to compare the 4AT with another commonly used delirium assessment tool, the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).MethodsThis was a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study set in emergency departments or acute medical wards involving acute medical patients aged ≥ 70. All those without acutely life-threatening illness or coma were eligible. Patients underwent (1) reference standard delirium assessment based on DSM-IV criteria and (2) were randomised to either the index test (4AT, scores 0-12; prespecified score of > 3 considered positive) or the comparator (CAM; scored positive or negative), in a random order, using computer-generated pseudo-random numbers, stratified by study site, with block allocation. Reference standard and 4AT or CAM assessments were performed by pairs of independent raters blinded to the results of the other assessment.ResultsEight hundred forty-three individuals were randomised: 21 withdrew, 3 lost contact, 32 indeterminate diagnosis, 2 missing outcome, and 785 were included in the analysis. Mean age was 81.4 (SD 6.4) years. 12.1% (95/785) had delirium by reference standard assessment, 14.3% (56/392) by 4AT, and 4.7% (18/384) by CAM. The 4AT had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.96). The 4AT had a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 61-87%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 92-97%). The CAM had a sensitivity of 40% (95% CI 26-57%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98-100%).ConclusionsThe 4AT is a short, pragmatic tool which can help improving detection rates of delirium in routine clinical care.Trial registrationInternational standard randomised controlled trial number (ISRCTN) 53388093 . Date applied 30/05/2014; date assigned 02/06/2014.

Dataset Information

PRe-hospital Evaluation of Sensitive TrOponin (PRESTO) Study: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study protocol.

Publications

PRe-hospital Evaluation of Sensitive TrOponin (PRESTO) Study: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study protocol.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets