Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

20 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection for a large protruded lesion located just behind the pyloric ring with a scissor-type knife.

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Tashima T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6831912 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Endoscopic submucosal dissection using scissors-type knife for a giant solitary duodenal polyp.

Project description:Video 1.

| S-EPMC8351124 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large duodenal neuroendocrine tumor adjacent to the pyloric ring.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7221237 | biostudies-literature

Pocket-creation method in endoscopic submucosal dissection for a gastric carcinoma located on the pyloric ring.

Project description:Video 1Early gastric carcinoma across the pyloric ring was effectively treated by the pocket-creating method during endoscopic submucosal dissection.

| S-EPMC8186167 | biostudies-literature

Successful duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection using multiple clip-and-thread traction for a large tumor located in the duodenal bulb.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8058531 | biostudies-literature

Minimally invasive management of large duodenal lipoma: endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of large duodenal lipomas (DLs) of ≥2 cm between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR).MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent endoscopic resection of large DLs from June 2017 to March 2021 at our hospital. Clinicopathologic features, clinical outcomes, and follow-up endoscopy findings were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsTwenty-three patients (12 men) with a mean age of 57.4 years were included. The median tumor size was 28.4 ± 13.3 mm. ESD was performed in 19 patients, and EFTR was performed in 4. Complete resection was achieved in 21 patients. The operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ESD than EFTR group. Four patients in the EFTR group developed a fever; no other adverse events occurred. No patients required surgical intervention. During the average follow-up of 21.1 months, no residual tumor, recurrence, or metastasis was observed.ConclusionBoth ESD and EFTR provide minimally invasive, localized treatment of selected DLs. ESD might have some advantages in resecting large DLs in terms of procedure time and hospitalization.

| S-EPMC8721732 | biostudies-literature

Underwater reopenable clip closure of mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7651752 | biostudies-literature

Current Challenge: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.

Project description:Opinion statementWith the widespread use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in recent years, the detection rate of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is increasing. Most SNADETs are early-stage adenocarcinoma or benign conditions, including adenoma. Therefore, endoscopic resection is desirable from the perspective of quality of life. However, endoscopic resection for SNADETs has not yet been established. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the most promising method for the treatment of SNADETs, because ESD provides a high rate of en bloc resection and a low rate of recurrence regardless of the tumor size. However, the difficulty of the procedure and a high rate of severe adverse events including perforation and bleeding have become major problems. Various preventive countermeasures for adverse events, such as use of specific devices, endoscope stabilization methods, and endoscopic closure of the post-ESD ulcer using clips, are reported to reduce the risk of the adverse events of ESD for SNADETs. This article reviews and highlights the current state of ESD for SNADETs and new challenges towards safe and effective ESD.

| S-EPMC7588384 | biostudies-literature

Hemostatic forceps used as a scissor-type knife in combination with the transanal-traction method for assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection in the area of the dentate line.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7805017 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using a Novel Versatile Knife: An Animal Feasibility Study (with Video).

Project description:BACKGROUND/AIMS:In order to reduce the procedure time and the number of accessory changes during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), we developed a novel versatile knife, which has the combined advantages of several conventional knives. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and histological quality of ESD performed using this novel versatile knife and a combination of several conventional knives. METHODS:This was an in vivo animal study comparing two different modalities of ESD in mini-pigs. Completion time of each resection was documented, and the resected specimens were retrieved and evaluated for completeness. To assess the quality control of the procedures and adverse events, detailed histopathological examinations were performed. RESULTS:A total of 18 specimens were dissected by ESD safely and easily (nine specimens using the new versatile knife; nine specimens by mixing conventional knives). All resections were completed as en bloc resections. There was no significant difference in procedure time between the 2 modalities (456 seconds vs. 355 seconds, p=0.258) and cutting speed (1.983 mm(2)/sec vs. 1.57 mm(2)/sec, p=1.000). The rate of adverse events and histological quality did not statistically differ between the modalities. CONCLUSIONS:ESD with a versatile knife appeared to be an easy, safe, and technically efficient method.

| S-EPMC4260103 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of an Inverted Pyloric Gland Adenoma Using Dental Floss and Clip Traction.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8652166 | biostudies-literature