Dataset Information

Thrombelastometry guided blood-component therapy after cardiac surgery: a randomized study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Significant bleeding is a well known complication after cardiac surgical procedures and is associated with worse outcome. Thrombelastometry (ROTEM®) allows point-of-care testing of the coagulation status but only limited data is available yet. The aim was to evaluate the ROTEM®-guided blood component therapy in a randomized trial. METHODS:In case of significant postoperative bleeding (>?200?ml/h) following elective isolated or combined cardiac surgical procedures (including 14% re-do procedures and 4% requiring circulatory arrest) patients were randomized to either a 4-chamber ROTEM®-guided blood-component transfusion protocol or received treatment guided by an algorithm based on standard coagulation testing (control). One hundred four patients (mean age: 67.2?±?10.4?years, mean log. EuroSCORE 7.0?±?8.8%) met the inclusion criteria. Mean CPB-time was 112.1?±?55.1?min., mean cross-clamp time 72.5?±?39.9?min. RESULTS:Baseline demographics were comparable in both groups. Overall there was no significant difference in transfusion requirements regarding red blood cells, platelets, plasma, fibrinogen or pooled factors and the re-thoracotomy rate was comparable (ROTEM®: 29% vs. control: 25%). However, there was a trend towards less 24-h drainage loss visible in the ROTEM®-group (ROTEM®: 1599.1?±?834.3?ml vs. control: 1867.4?±?827.4?ml; p?=?0.066). In the subgroup of patients with long CPB-times (>?115?min.; n?=?55) known to exhibit an increased risk for diffuse coagulopathy ROTEM®-guided treatment resulted in a significantly lower 24-h drainage loss (ROTEM®: 1538.2?±?806.4?ml vs. control: 2056.8?±?974.5?ml; p?=?0.032) and reduced 5-year mortality (ROTEM®: 0% vs. control: 15%; p?=?0.03). CONCLUSION:In case of postoperative bleeding following cardiac surgical procedures a treatment algorithm based on "point-of-care" 4-chamber ROTEM® seems to be at least as effective as standard therapy. In patients with long CPB-times ROTEM®-guided treatment may result in less bleeding, a marked reduction in costs and long-term mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION:German Clinical Trials Register, TRN: DRKS00017367 , date of registration: 05.06.2019, 'retrospectively registered'.

SUBMITTER: Haensig M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6833285 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Thrombelastometry guided blood-component therapy after cardiac surgery: a randomized study.

Haensig Martin M Kempfert Joerg J Kempfert Pia-Maria PM Girdauskas Evaldas E Borger Michael Andrew MA Lehmann Sven S

BMC anesthesiology 20191106 1

<h4>Background</h4>Significant bleeding is a well known complication after cardiac surgical procedures and is associated with worse outcome. Thrombelastometry (ROTEM®) allows point-of-care testing of the coagulation status but only limited data is available yet. The aim was to evaluate the ROTEM®-guided blood component therapy in a randomized trial.<h4>Methods</h4>In case of significant postoperative bleeding (> 200 ml/h) following elective isolated or combined cardiac surgical procedures (inclu ...[more]

PMID: 31694568

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceExcessive bleeding is a common complication of cardiac surgery. An important cause of bleeding is acquired hypofibrinogenemia (fibrinogen level <1.5-2.0 g/L), for which guidelines recommend fibrinogen replacement with cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate. The 2 products have important differences, but comparative clinical data are lacking.ObjectiveTo determine if fibrinogen concentrate is noninferior to cryoprecipitate for treatment of bleeding related to hypofibrinogenemia after cardiac surgery.Design, setting, and participantsRandomized clinical trial at 11 Canadian hospitals enrolling adult patients experiencing clinically significant bleeding and hypofibrinogenemia after cardiac surgery (from February 10, 2017, to November 1, 2018). Final 28-day follow-up visit was completed on November 28, 2018.InterventionsFibrinogen concentrate (4 g; n = 415) or cryoprecipitate (10 units; n = 412) for each ordered dose within 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcome was blood components (red blood cells, platelets, plasma) administered during 24 hours post bypass. A 2-sample, 1-sided test for the ratio of the mean number of units was conducted to evaluate noninferiority (threshold for noninferiority ratio, <1.2).ResultsOf 827 randomized patients, 735 (372 fibrinogen concentrate, 363 cryoprecipitate) were treated and included in the primary analysis (median age, 64 [interquartile range, 53-72] years; 30% women; 72% underwent complex operations; 95% moderate to severe bleeding; and pretreatment fibrinogen level, 1.6 [interquartile range, 1.3-1.9] g/L). The trial met the a priori stopping criterion for noninferiority at the interim analysis after 827 of planned 1200 patients were randomized. Mean 24-hour postbypass allogeneic transfusions were 16.3 (95% CI, 14.9 to 17.8) units in the fibrinogen concentrate group and 17.0 (95% CI, 15.6 to 18.6) units in the cryoprecipitate group (ratio, 0.96 [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 1.09; P < .001 for noninferiority] [2-sided 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.09; P = .50 for superiority]). Thromboembolic events occurred in 26 patients (7.0%) in the fibrinogen concentrate group and 35 patients (9.6%) in the cryoprecipitate group.Conclusions and relevanceIn patients undergoing cardiac surgery who develop clinically significant bleeding and hypofibrinogenemia after cardiopulmonary bypass, fibrinogen concentrate is noninferior to cryoprecipitate with regard to number of blood components transfused in a 24-hour period post bypass. Use of fibrinogen concentrate may be considered for management of bleeding in patients with acquired hypofibrinogenemia in cardiac surgery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03037424.

Project description:Cardiac surgery is the most common setting for massive transfusion in medically advanced countries. Studies of massive transfusion after injury suggest that the ratios of administered plasma and platelets (PLT) to red blood cells (RBCs) affect mortality. Data from the Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS), a large randomized trial of the effect of RBC storage duration in patients undergoing complex cardiac surgery, were analyzed retrospectively to investigate the association between blood component ratios used in massively transfused patients and subsequent clinical outcomes.Massive transfusion was defined as those who had ?6 RBC units or ?8 total blood components. For plasma, high ratio was defined as ?1 plasma unit:1 RBC unit. For PLT transfusion, high ratio was defined as ?0.2 PLT doses:1 RBC unit; PLT dose was defined as 1 apheresis PLT or 5 whole blood PLT equivalents. The clinical outcomes analyzed were mortality and the change in the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (?MODS) comparing the preoperative score with the highest composite score through the earliest of death, discharge, or day 7. Outcomes were compared between patients transfused with high and low ratios. Linear and Cox regression were used to explore relationships between predictors and continuous outcomes and time to event outcomes.A total of 324 subjects met the definition of massive transfusion. In those receiving high plasma:RBC ratio, the mean (SE) 7- and 28-day ?MODS was 1.24 (0.45) and 1.26 (0.56) points lower, (P = .007 and P = .024), respectively, than in patients receiving lower ratios. In patients receiving high PLT:RBC ratio, the mean (SE) 7- and 28-day ?MODS were 1.55 (0.53) and 1.49 (0.65) points lower (P = .004 and P = .022), respectively. Subjects who received low-ratio plasma:RBC transfusion had excess 7-day mortality compared with those who received high ratio (7.2% vs 1.7%, respectively, P = .0318), which remained significant at 28 days (P = .035). The ratio of PLT:RBCs was not associated with differences in mortality.This analysis found that in complex cardiac surgery patients who received massive transfusion, there was an association between the composition of blood products used and clinical outcomes. Specifically, there was less organ dysfunction in those who received high-ratio transfusions (plasma:RBCs and PLT:RBCs), and lower mortality in those who received high-ratio plasma:RBC transfusions.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Adult cardiac surgery is often complicated by elevated blood losses that account for elevated transfusion requirements. Perioperative bleeding and transfusion of blood products are major risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Timely diagnostic and goal-directed therapies aim at the reduction of bleeding and need for allogeneic transfusions. METHODS:Single-centre, prospective, randomized trial assessing blood loss and transfusion requirements of 26 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery at high risk for perioperative bleeding. Primary endpoint was blood loss at 24?h postoperatively. Random assignment to intra- and postoperative haemostatic management following either an algorithm based on conventional coagulation assays (conventional group: platelet count, aPTT, PT, fibrinogen) or based on point-of-care (PoC-group) monitoring, i.e. activated rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) combined with multiple aggregometry (Multiplate®). Differences between groups were analysed using nonparametric tests for independent samples. RESULTS:The study was terminated after interim analysis (n =?26). Chest tube drainage volume was 360?ml (IQR 229-599?ml) in the conventional group, and 380?ml (IQR 310-590?ml) in the PoC-group (p =?0.767) after 24?h. Basic patient characteristics, results of PoC coagulation assays, and transfusion requirements of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma did not differ between groups. Coagulation results were comparable. Platelets were transfused in the PoC group only. CONCLUSION:Blood loss via chest tube drainage and transfusion amounts were not different comparing PoC- and central lab-driven transfusion algorithms in subjects that underwent high-risk cardiac surgery. Routine PoC coagulation diagnostics do not seem to be beneficial when actual blood loss is low. High risk procedures might not suffice as a sole risk factor for increased blood loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT01402739 , Date of registration July 26, 2011.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Cardiac surgical procedures are associated with postoperative neurological complications such as cognitive decline and delirium, which can complicate recovery and impair quality of life. Perioperative depression and anxiety may be associated with increased mortality after cardiac surgeries. Surgical prehabilitation is an emerging concept that includes preoperative interventions to potentially reduce postoperative complications. While most current prehabilitation interventions focus on optimizing physical health, mind-body interventions are an area of growing interest. Preoperative mind-body interventions such as Isha Kriya meditation, may hold significant potential to improve postsurgical outcomes. METHODS:This is a prospective, randomized controlled feasibility trial. A total of 40 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery will be randomized to one of three study groups. Participants randomized to either of the two intervention groups will receive meditative intervention: (1) commencing two weeks before surgery; or (2) commencing only from the day after surgery. Meditative intervention will last for four weeks after the surgery in these groups. Participants in the third control group will receive the current standard of care with no meditative intervention. All participants will undergo assessments using neurocognitive, sleep, depression, anxiety, and pain questionnaires at various time points in the perioperative period. Blood samples will be collected at baseline, preoperatively, and postoperatively to assess for inflammatory biomarkers. The primary aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility of implementing a perioperative meditative intervention program. Other objectives include studying the effect of meditation on postoperative pain, sleep, psychological wellbeing, cognitive function, and delirium. These will be used to calculate effect size to design future studies. DISCUSSION:This study serves as the first step towards understanding the feasibility of implementing a mind-body intervention as a prehabilitative intervention to improve postoperative surgical outcomes after cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03198039 . Registered on 23 June 2017.

Project description:Essentials TEG-guided therapy has been shown to be valuable in a number of surgical settings. This systematic review and analysis specifically evaluated the effects of TEG-guided therapy. TEG-guided therapy can improve blood product utilization and enhance resource management. Use of TEG improved key patient outcomes, including bleed rate, length of stay and mortality.BackgroundThromboelastography (TEG 5000 and 6s Thrombelastograph Hemostasis Analyzer; Haemonetics) is a point-of-care system designed to monitor and analyze the entire coagulation process in real time. TEG-guided therapy has been shown to be valuable in a variety of surgical settings.ObjectiveTo conduct an analysis of published clinical trials to evaluate the effects of TEG-guided transfusion for the management of perioperative bleeding on patient outcomes.Patients/methodsWe searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE for original articles reporting studies using TEG vs controls in a perioperative setting for inclusion in this systematic review. We identified nine eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in two elective surgery settings (cardiac surgery and liver surgery), but only one RCT in the emergency setting.ResultsIn the elective surgery study meta-analysis, platelet (P = 0.004), plasma (P < 0.001) and red blood cell transfusion (P = 0.14), operating room length of stay (LoS) (P = 0.005), intensive care unit LoS (P = 0.04) and bleeding rate (P = 0.002) were reduced with TEG-guided transfusion vs controls. Although blood product use was reduced, rates of mortality remained comparable between the TEG group and control group. In the emergency setting evaluation, the RCT reported lower mortality in the TEG group than in the control group (P = 0.049). In addition, there were significant reductions in platelet and plasma transfusion (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively), and the number of ventilator-free days increased, in the TEG group as compared with the control group (P = 0.10).ConclusionsThis systematic review and analysis indicate that TEG-guided hemostatic therapy can enhance blood product management and improve key patient outcomes, including LoS, bleeding rate, and mortality.

Project description:BackgroundSeveral studies suggest beneficial effects of perioperative statin therapy on postoperative outcome after cardiac surgery. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show potential detrimental effects. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the association between perioperative statin therapy and clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.MethodsElectronic databases were searched up to 1 November 2016 for RCTs of preoperative statin therapy versus placebo or no treatment in adult cardiac surgery. Postoperative outcomes were acute kidney injury, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, stroke, infections, and mortality. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed-effects meta-analyses. Primary analysis was restricted to trials with low risk of bias according to Cochrane methodology, and sensitivity analyses examined whether the risk of bias of included studies was associated with different results. We performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to test the strength of the results.ResultsWe included data from 23 RCTs involving 5102 patients. Meta-analysis of trials with low risk of bias showed that statin therapy was associated with an increase in acute kidney injury (314 of 1318 (23.82%) with statins versus 262 of 1319 (19.86%) with placebo; OR 1.26 (95%CI 1.05 to 1.52); p = 0.01); these results were supported by TSA. No difference in postoperative atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, stroke, infections, or mortality was present. On sensitivity analysis, statin therapy was associated with a slight increase in hospital mortality. Meta-analysis including also trials with high or unclear risk of bias showed no beneficial effects of statin therapy on any postoperative outcomes.ConclusionsThere is no evidence that statin therapy in the days prior to cardiac surgery is beneficial for patients' outcomes. Particularly, statins are not protective against postoperative atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, stroke, or infections. Statins are associated with a possible increased risk of acute kidney injury and a detrimental effect on hospital survival could not be excluded. Future RCTs should further evaluate the safety profile of this therapy in relation to patients' outcomes and assess the more appropriate time point for discontinuation of statins before cardiac surgery.

Dataset Information

Thrombelastometry guided blood-component therapy after cardiac surgery: a randomized study.

Publications

Thrombelastometry guided blood-component therapy after cardiac surgery: a randomized study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure