Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Lipofilling after breast conserving surgery: a comprehensive literature review investigating its oncologic safety.


ABSTRACT: Lipofilling has regenerative properties used to improve deformities after breast conserving surgery. Our hypothesis is that there is inadequate data to ensure that lipofilling does not increase locoregional cancer recurrence after breast conserving surgery. A PRISMA comprehensive literature review was conducted of articles published prior to October 2019 investigating recurrence in patients who underwent lipofilling after breast conserving surgery. All forms of breast conserving surgery, fat grafting, and injection intervals were included. Patients undergoing mastectomy were excluded. Requirements to define lipofilling as "safe" included (I) a defined interval between resection and lipofilling; (II) a minimum follow-up period of 6 years from tumor resection; (III) a minimum follow-up period of 3 years from lipofilling; (IV) presence of a control group; (V) controls matched for ER/PR/Her-2; (VI) a sub-group analysis focusing on ER/PR/Her-2; (VII) adequate powering. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria. The range in time from breast conserving surgery to fat injection was 0-76 months. The average time to follow-up after lipofilling was 23 days-60 months. Two studies had a sufficient follow-up time from both primary resection and from lipofilling. Seventeen of the nineteen studies specified the interval between resection and lipofilling, but there is currently no consensus regarding how soon lipofilling can be performed following BCS. Eight studies performed a subgroup analysis in cases of recurrence and found recurrence after lipofilling was associated with number of positive axillary nodes, intraepithelial neoplasia, high grade histology, Luminal A subtype, age <50, Ki-67 expression, and lipofilling within 3 months of primary resection. Of the eleven studies that included a comparison group, one matched patient for Her-2 and there was a statistically significant difference in Her-2 positive cancers in the study arms of two articles. Several studies deemed lipofilling "safe," two showed association of lipofilling and local recurrence, and most studies concluded that further research was needed. Insufficient and contradictory data exists to demonstrate the safety of lipofilling after breast conserving surgery. A multicentered, well designed study is needed to verify the safety of this practice.

SUBMITTER: Cohen S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6842766 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Lipofilling after breast conserving surgery: a comprehensive literature review investigating its oncologic safety.

Cohen Stephanie S   Sekigami Yurie Y   Schwartz Theresa T   Losken Albert A   Margenthaler Julie J   Chatterjee Abhishek A  

Gland surgery 20191001 5


Lipofilling has regenerative properties used to improve deformities after breast conserving surgery. Our hypothesis is that there is inadequate data to ensure that lipofilling does not increase locoregional cancer recurrence after breast conserving surgery. A PRISMA comprehensive literature review was conducted of articles published prior to October 2019 investigating recurrence in patients who underwent lipofilling after breast conserving surgery. All forms of breast conserving surgery, fat gra  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC11002492 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11364001 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10788576 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9125620 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6158154 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4636081 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5514175 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8650120 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6291280 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6849881 | biostudies-literature