Dataset Information

ACTR-47. PHASE-III TRIAL OF STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY VS. CHEMOTHERAPY GUIDED BY CANCER STEM CELL TEST IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (NCT03632135)

ABSTRACT: Abstract Stupp treatment protocol for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) has improved the median overall survival to 14.6 months. However, no investigations have defined effective strategies against recurrence and the prognosis of recurrent GBM patients remains poor. Personalized medicine with assay-guided treatment targeting chemotherapy resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) alongside the bulk tumor cells is a new paradigm in cancer treatment that may result in improved patient’s outcome. We are using ChemoID, a CLIA and CAP certified CSC cytotoxicity assay for predicting response to chemotherapeutic agents. Our prospective analysis of 61 GBM patients demonstrated that ChemoID-guided treatment significantly improved tumor response. For every 5% increase in cell kill of CSCs by assay-guided chemotherapy, 12-month patient response (non-recurrence of cancer) increased 2.5-fold, OR=2.3 (p=0.01). We also found that median recurrence time was 20-months versus 3-months for patients with a positive (>40% cell kill) CSC test versus negative, whereas median recurrence time was 13-months versus 4-months for patients with a positive (>55% cell kill) bulk test versus negative. We are conducting a multi-institutional phase-III clinical trial (NCT03632135) to determine the clinical validity of the ChemoID assay as a predictor of clinical response in recurrent GBM. The study has been designed as a parallel group controlled clinical trial and the participants are randomized to either standard of care chemotherapy chosen by the physician or ChemoID-guided therapy. Response to therapy will be measured by MRI imaging using RANO criteria. Primary endpoint of median overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints of OS at 6, 9, and 12 months, median progression free survival (PFS), PFS at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, objective tumor response, time to recurrence, and quality of life will be measured. Trial is open and currently 22 subjects have been enrolled. Interim analysis of the trial will be conducted in approximately 12 months.

SUBMITTER: Ranjan T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6847312 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND CDK4/6-dependent cell-cycle regulation is disrupted in 78% of glioblastoma (GBM) patients and novel CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown anti-tumor activity in animal models. To explore the utility of ribociclib, a selective CDK4/6-inhibitor, in treating recurrent GBM patients, we conducted a phase 0/II clinical trial (NCT02933736) to examine plasma and tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). METHODS Recurrent GBM patients enrolled in the phase 0 component were treated with daily oral ribociclib (900 mg) for 5 days prior to planned resection of their tumor. Patient selection was based on intact Rb expression and CDKN2A deletion or CDK4/6 amplification. Plasma, tumor, and CSF samples were collected at predefined time points, and drug concentrations in these samples were determined by validated LC-MS/MS methods. PD effects, including RB phosphorylation and FoxM1 expression, were compared to matched archival tissue. Patients with positive PK and PD outcomes were enrolled into the phase II component to evaluate clinical efficacy with a primary endpoint of progression-free survival. RESULT To date, 10 recurrent GBM patients have been screened and 5 patients enrolled into the phase 0 component, each undergoing surgery 2–4 hours after their final dose. No drug-related adverse events have been observed. Ribociclib showed better penetration into contrast-enhancing tumor regions than non-enhancing regions, with median tumor concentrations of 48.4 vs. 12.7 nmol/g, respectively, and median tumor-to-plasma partition ratios of 10.2 and 3.5, respectively. Ribociclib CSF concentrations (potentially pharmacologically-active, unbound drug) ranged from 0.32 – 0.68 nmol/mL (median, 0.58 nmol/mL), exceeding the in vitro IC50 for inhibition of CDK4/6 (<0.04 nmol/mL). 60% of phase 0 patients exhibited PD effects and were enrolled into the phase II component. CONCLUSION Preliminary PK data suggests ribociclib achieves pharmacologically-active, and potentially therapeutic, concentrations in human GBM. Further studies to validate drug tumor penetration, tumor pharmacodynamic effects, and clinical efficacy are underway.

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND CDK4/6-dependent cell-cycle regulation is disrupted in 78% of glioblastoma patients. We conducted a Phase 0/2 clinical trial (NCT02933736) of ribociclib, a selective CDK4/6-inhibitor, to examine the plasma and tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS Eligible patients with intact RB expression and CDKN2A deletion or CDK4/6 amplification were enrolled into the Phase 0 component to receive ribociclib (900mg daily) for 5 days prior to tumor resection. Plasma, tumor, and CSF samples were collected to determine drug concentrations using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PD effects, including RB and FoxM1 phosphorylation, were compared to archival tissue. Patients with favorable PK and PD outcomes were transitioned into the Phase 2 component. RESULTS Twelve patients were enrolled into three presurgical time-escalation groups (2-hours, 8-hours, 24-hours). Ribociclib penetrated both enhancing and non-enhancing regions of the tumor. In non-enhancing tissue, median unbound brain-to-plasma ratio was 1.78 and median ribociclib concentration was 0.54 nmol/mL, exceeding the in vitro IC50 for CDK4/6 (0.04 nmol/mL). Suppression of G1-to-S phase was inferred by a decrease in RB phosphorylation (p<0.01) and cell proliferation (p<0.05). Six patients (50%) were graduated to the Phase 2 component and demonstrated a median progression-free survival of 9.7 weeks (95% CI, 6.3 to 40 weeks). Tissue samples from re-resection following Phase 2 study identified mTOR pathway upregulation as a candidate resistance mechanism to ribociclib monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Ribociclib penetrates the tumor-brain barrier, achieving pharmacologically-active concentrations in human glioblastoma and suppressing tumor proliferation. Phase 2 study results suggest ribociclib is ineffective as a monotherapy, but analysis of ribociclib-resistant tumors identified the addition of an mTOR inhibitor as a dual-drug strategy for recurrent glioblastoma.

Project description:BackgroundRecent studies showed inconsistent results of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in terms of their safety and efficacy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the value of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma treatment.MethodsDatabases such as MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the topic of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and single-agent therapy as treatments for recurrent glioblastoma from January 1980 to April 2018. Subsequent articles were then sorted, evaluated, and analyzed.ResultsWe pooled 1,169 patient cases from seven RCTs. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy showed a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.65; 95% CI 0.57-0.74; P<0.001) compared to single-agent therapy. In addition, the overall survival (OS) rate showed insignificant differences between the two groups (HR=0.96; 95% CI 0.83-1.12; P=0.622). Simultaneously, we found that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (OR=2.10; 95% CI 1.32-3.33; P=0.002), but also higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) (OR=1.85; 95% CI 1.26-2.71; P=0.002). However, in subgroup analysis, we found that AEs showed insignificant differences between the two treatment methods when bevacizumab was used as the single-agent therapy subgroup (P=0.058). In addition, in the subgroup with low corticosteroid use rate at baseline (N<50%), ORR (P=0.108) and AEs (P=0.134) showed insignificant differences between the two groups.ConclusionBevacizumab combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve PFS and ORR, but did not prolong OS in these studies, and can even lead to higher odds of AEs. In addition, bevacizumab may play a dominant role and corticosteroid may be an unfavorable factor in the combination therapy of recurrent glioblastoma.

Project description:Abstract The standard of care for glioblastoma is neurosurgical resection followed by radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. Although RT is effective for glioblastoma, attempts to improve survival using RT dose escalation above 60 Gy have been largely unsuccessful. This may be because prior attempts have been targeted to resection cavity or enhancing tumor, which may not accurately predict areas at highest recurrence risk. To overcome the limitations of standard T1 and T2-weighted MRI in predicting tumor recurrence, we have shown that supplementation with 3D high-resolution spectroscopic MRI (sMRI) identifies actively proliferating tumor beyond areas of T1-enhancement by measuring endogenous metabolites and their ratios. Previously, we demonstrated that the choline to N-acetylaspartate ratio (Cho/NAA) best correlates with tumor cellularity in surgically resected tissue (?=0.82, p< 0.001) and, most importantly, areas of sMRI metabolic abnormalities predate disease recurrence in those same areas (Cordova et al, Neuro-Oncology 2016). Therefore, we seek to identify whether sMRI can be used by radiation oncologists to choose the optimal regions to target for RT dose escalation. To assess its feasibility and safety, we developed a web-based imaging platform designed specifically to incorporate sMRI into the RT planning clinical workflow and are using it in a multisite sMRI-guided dose escalation trial (NCT03137888; Emory, Johns Hopkins, U. Miami). Recently, we have completed full enrollment including 30 patients treated with sMRI-guided dose escalated RT across three institutions. We have demonstrated successful integration of sMRI into the RT planning workflow, and we have delivered sMRI-guided dose escalated RT plans to glioblastoma patients without severe adverse events to date. Follow-up data will be analyzed for overall and progression-free survival. Based on the feasibility and safety of this technique in the current trial, we plan to assess the efficacy of sMRI-guided dose-escalated RT on patient outcomes in a NCTN clinical trial.

Project description:ImportanceDisulfiram has demonstrated broad antitumoral effect in several preclinical studies. One of the proposed indications is for the treatment of glioblastoma.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of disulfiram and copper as add-on to alkylating chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.Design, setting, and participantsThis was a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II/III clinical trial with parallel group design. Patients were recruited at 7 study sites in Sweden and 2 sites in Norway between January 2017 and November 2020. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had a first recurrence of glioblastoma, and indication for treatment with alkylating chemotherapy. Patients were followed up until death or a maximum of 24 months. The date of final follow-up was January 15, 2021. Data analysis was performed from February to September 2022.InterventionsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care (SOC) alkylating chemotherapy alone, or SOC with the addition of disulfiram (400 mg daily) and copper (2.5 mg daily).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was survival at 6 months. Secondary end points included overall survival, progression-free survival, adverse events, and patient-reported quality of life.ResultsAmong the 88 patients randomized to either SOC (n = 45) or SOC plus disulfiram and copper (n = 43), 63 (72%) were male; the mean (SD) age was 55.4 (11.5) years. There was no significant difference between the study groups (SOC vs SOC plus disulfiram and copper) in 6 months survival (62% [26 of 42] vs 44% [19 of 43]; P = .10). Median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.4-10.2 months) with SOC and 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-9.3 months) with SOC plus disulfiram and copper, and median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.4-4.6 months) vs 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.7-2.6 months), respectively. More patients in the SOC plus disulfiram and copper group had adverse events grade 3 or higher (34% [14 of 41] vs 11% [5 of 44]; P = .02) and serious adverse events (41% [17 of 41] vs 16% [7 of 44]; P = .02), and 10 patients (24%) discontinued disulfiram treatment because of adverse effects.Conclusions and relevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that among patients with recurrent glioblastoma, the addition of disulfiram and copper to chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, resulted in significantly increased toxic effects, but no significant difference in survival. These findings suggest that disulfiram and copper is without benefit in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02678975; EUDRACT Identifier: 2016-000167-16.

Project description:Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain cancer. Current standard-of-care includes surgery followed by concurrent therapy with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) and maintenance TMZ. Almost all GBM patients experience recurrent/progressive disease, and median survival after recurrence is 3–9 months. Effective therapies for recurrent GBM (rGBM) are lacking, representing a significant unmet medical need. Unmethylated promoter for O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) is a validated biomarker for TMZ-resistance and is correlated with a poor prognosis. Second-line treatment with the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab (BEV) has not improved survival, and 5-year survival is less than 3%. VAL-083 is a bi-functional DNA-targeting agent rapidly inducing interstrand cross-links at N7-guanine, leading to DNA double-strand breaks and cell-death. VAL-083s cytotoxicity is independent of MGMT status, and VAL-083 overcomes TMZ-resistance in GBM cell lines, GBM cancer stem cells, and in vivo GBM models. We completed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial of VAL-083 in TMZ- and BEV-refractory rGBM. 40mg/m2/day given on days 1,2,3 of a 21-day cycle was generally well-tolerated, and this dose was selected for further clinical evaluation in Phase 2 trials. The trial described here is an ongoing single-arm, biomarker-driven Phase 2 trial in MGMT-unmethylated BEV-naïve adult rGBM. In this trial, 48 patients will receive VAL-083 40mg/m2/day on days 1,2,3 of a 21-day cycle. Tumor response will be assessed by MRI approximately every 42 days, per RANO criteria. The primary objective of this study is to determine if VAL-083 improves median overall survival (mOS) for MGMT-unmethylated rGBM patients compared to a historical mOS of 7.1 months for such patients treated with lomustine (EORTC26101). Secondary efficacy endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and quality-of-life (QOL) evaluation using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) self-reporting tool. Enrollment and safety data update will be provided at the meeting. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02717962.

Dataset Information

ACTR-47. PHASE-III TRIAL OF STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY VS. CHEMOTHERAPY GUIDED BY CANCER STEM CELL TEST IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (NCT03632135)

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets