Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The effect of probiotic therapy on bacterial vaginosis (BV) is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety associated with probiotic treatment for BV. METHODS:We searched multiple databases covering up to 1 March 2018. Studies published as blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing treatment using probiotic versus active or placebo control in BV patients were included, with at least one-month follow-up. Random effects model and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were applied. RESULTS:Ten studies (n = 2321) were included. Compared with placebo, the probiotics-only therapy resulted in a beneficial outcome both in clinical cure rate at the 30th day (risk ratio, RR = 2.57; 95% confidential interval, 95% CI: 1.96 to 3.37), and Nugent score (mean difference, MD = -2.71; 95% CI: 3.41 to -2.00). This effect decreased but remained significant after eight weeks. Probiotics-post-antibiotics therapy had a decreased effect only for a short term and possibly among studies with a mostly black study population. No extra adverse events were observed. The TSA suggested a larger sample size for effective evaluation of the probiotics as a supplementary remedy. CONCLUSIONS:Probiotic regimes are safe and may exhibit a short-term and long-term beneficial effect for BV treatment. The ethnic-specific result for the probiotic used after antibiotics is worthy of further study.

SUBMITTER: Wang Z 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6848925 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9530327 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3039685 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8388924 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10171232 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB11586 | ENA
| S-EPMC5706491 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3462776 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6802328 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10434177 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4957510 | biostudies-literature