Dataset Information

The quality of dying and death for patients in intensive care units: a single center pilot study.

ABSTRACT: Background:To identify the necessary care for dying patients in intensive care units (ICUs), we designed a retrospective study to evaluate the quality of dying and death (QODD) experienced by the surrogates of patients with medical illness who died in the ICU of a tertiary referral hospital. Methods:To achieve our objective, the authors compared the QODD scores as appraised by the relatives of patients who died of cancer under hospice care with those who died in the ICU. For this study, a Korean version of the QODD questionnaire was developed, and individual interviews were also conducted. Results:Sixteen people from the intensive care group and 23 people from the hospice care group participated in the survey and completed the questionnaire. The family members of patients who died in the ICU declined participation at a high rate (50%), with the primary reason being to avoid bringing back painful memories (14 people, 87.5%). The relatives of the intensive care group obtained an average total score on the 17-item QODD questionnaire, which was significantly lower than that of the relatives of the hospice group (48.7±15.5 vs. 60.3±14.8, P=0.03). Conclusions:This work implies that there are unmet needs for the care of dying patients and for the QODD in tertiary hospital ICUs. This result suggests that shared decision making for advance care planning should be encouraged and that education on caring for dying patients should be provided to healthcare professionals to improve the QODD in Korean ICUs.

SUBMITTER: Choi Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6849018 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The quality of dying and death for patients in intensive care units: a single center pilot study.

Choi Yanghwan Y Park Myoungrin M Kang Da Hyun DH Lee Jooseon J Moon Jae Young JY Ahn Heejoon H

Acute and critical care 20190408 3

<h4>Background</h4>To identify the necessary care for dying patients in intensive care units (ICUs), we designed a retrospective study to evaluate the quality of dying and death (QODD) experienced by the surrogates of patients with medical illness who died in the ICU of a tertiary referral hospital.<h4>Methods</h4>To achieve our objective, the authors compared the QODD scores as appraised by the relatives of patients who died of cancer under hospice care with those who died in the ICU. For this ...[more]

PMID: 31723928

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeIn the era of COVID-19, those special settings or indications for which standard transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can safely produce benefits or advantages over minimized ultrasound imaging procedures need to be identified. Thus, the purpose of this study was to conduct a retrospective analysis with offline comprehensive conventional measurement of bilateral heart function and develop an appropriate prognostic model for in-hospital death.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 37 consecutive patients with COVID-19, confirmed by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay, who had undergone clinically indicated standard two-dimensional echocardiographic studies in intensive care wards. Offline comprehensive measurement was also performed. We further integrated the echocardiographic findings as paired evidence of vital organ involvement (possible respiratory distress assessed using right ventricular functional parameters, possible myocardial injury assessed using increased wall thickness, effusion or asynergy) and circulatory failure (suspected low flow status assessed using stroke volume index, suspected congestion assessed using elevated right or left atrial pressure). We evaluated its value for in-hospital death along with other echocardiographic findings.ResultsThe most common features included a normal-sized left atrium and left ventricle with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, despite deteriorated left ventricular flow volume. Less frequent findings, such as abnormalities in the right heart and left ventricular abnormalities suggesting myocarditis, were observed. Although the single echocardiographic parameters failed to show predictive values for in-hospital death, integration of the echocardiographic findings suggested predictive value (p = 0.04, odds ratio: 12.28).ConclusionStandard TTE at the bedside with offline comprehensive conventional measurement may provide prognostic information that is valuable for the management of patients with COVID-19.

Project description:BackgroundPatients in intensive care units (ICUs) often require quality palliative care for relief from various types of suffering. To achieve quality palliative care, specific goals need to be identified, measured, and reported. The present study aimed to develop quality indicators (QIs) for palliative care in ICUs, based on a systematic review and modified Delphi method, and test their feasibility by reviewing electronic medical record (EMR) data.MethodsThe current study was performed in two phases: the development of QIs using the modified Delphi method, and pilot-testing the quality of palliative care in ICUs based on EMR review. The pilot test included 262 patients admitted to the general or emergency ICU at a university hospital from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019.ResultsA 28-item QI set for palliative care in ICUs was developed based on the consensus of 16 experts. The Delphi process resulted in low measurability ratings for two items: "Assessment of the patient's psychological distress" and "Assessment of the patient's spiritual and cultural practices." However, these items were determined to be important for quality care from the perspective of holistic assessment of distress and were adopted in the final version of the QI set. While the pilot test results indicated the feasibility of the developed QIs, they suggested that the frequency of care performance varied, and certain aspects of palliative care in ICUs needed to be improved, namely (1) regular pain assessment, (2) identification of the patient's advance directive and advance care planning for treatment, (3) conducting an interdisciplinary family conference on palliative care, and (4) assessment of psychological distress of family members.ConclusionsThe QI set, developed using the modified Delphi method and tested using EMR data, provided a tool for assessing the quality of palliative care in ICUs. In the two ICUs considered in this study, aspects of the palliative care process with a low performance frequency were identified, and further national surveys were recommended. It is necessary to conduct ongoing surveys at more facilities to improve the quality of palliative care in ICUs.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Measuring the quality of care at the end of life and/or the quality of dying and death can be challenging. Some measurement tools seek to assess the quality of care immediately prior to death; others retrospectively assess, following death, the quality of end-of-life care. The comparative evaluation of the properties and application of the various instruments has been limited. OBJECTIVE:This systematic review identified and critically appraised the psychometric properties and applicability of tools used after death. METHOD:We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by systematically searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for relevant studies. We then appraised the psychometric properties and the quality of reporting of the psychometric properties of the identified tools using the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) checklist. The protocol of this systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42016047296). RESULTS:The search identified 4751 studies. Of these, 33 met the inclusion criteria, reporting on the psychometric properties of 67 tools. These tools measured quality of care at the end of life (n = 35), quality of dying and death (n = 22), or both quality of care at the end of life and dying and death (n = 10). Most tools were completed by family carers (n = 57), with some also completed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) (n = 2) or just HCPs (n = 8). No single tool was found to be adequate across all the psychometric properties assessed. Two quality of care at the end of life tools-Care of the Dying Evaluation and Satisfaction with Care at the End of Life in Dementia-had strong psychometric properties in most respects. Two tools assessing quality of dying and death-the Quality of Dying and Death and the newly developed Staff Perception of End of Life Experience-had limited to moderate evidence of good psychometric properties. Two tools assessing both quality of care and quality of dying and death-the Quality Of Dying in Long-Term Care for cognitively intact populations and Good Death Inventory (Korean version)-had the best psychometric properties. CONCLUSION:Four tools demonstrated some promise, but no single tool was consistent across all psychometric properties assessed. All tools identified would benefit from further psychometric testing.

Dataset Information

The quality of dying and death for patients in intensive care units: a single center pilot study.

Publications

The quality of dying and death for patients in intensive care units: a single center pilot study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets