Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke.


ABSTRACT: People with hemiparesis after stroke appear to recover 70% to 80% of the difference between their baseline and the maximum upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) score, a phenomenon called proportional recovery (PR). Two recent commentaries explained that PR should be expected because of mathematical coupling between the baseline and change score. Here we ask, If mathematical coupling encourages PR, why do a fraction of stroke patients (the "nonfitters") not exhibit PR? At the neuroanatomical level of analysis, this question was answered by Byblow et al-nonfitters lack corticospinal tract (CST) integrity at baseline-but here we address the mathematical and behavioral causes. We first derive a new interpretation of the slope of PR: It is the average probability of scoring across remaining scale items at follow-up. PR therefore breaks when enough test items are discretely more difficult for a patient at follow-up, flattening the slope of recovery. For the UEFM, we show that nonfitters are most unlikely to recover the ability to score on the test items related to wrist/hand dexterity, shoulder flexion without bending the elbow, and finger-to-nose movement, supporting the finding that nonfitters lack CST integrity. However, we also show that a subset of nonfitters respond better to robotic movement training in the chronic phase of stroke. These persons are just able to move the arm out of the flexion synergy and pick up small blocks, both markers of CST integrity. Nonfitters therefore raise interesting questions about CST function and the basis for response to intensive movement training.

SUBMITTER: Senesh MR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6851474 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke.

Senesh Merav R MR   Reinkensmeyer David J DJ  

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 20190816 11


People with hemiparesis after stroke appear to recover 70% to 80% of the difference between their baseline and the maximum upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) score, a phenomenon called proportional recovery (PR). Two recent commentaries explained that PR should be expected because of mathematical coupling between the baseline and change score. Here we ask, If mathematical coupling encourages PR, why do a fraction of stroke patients (the "nonfitters") <i>not</i> exhibit PR? At the neuroanatomical  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6308308 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6368856 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6453220 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9301320 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6854610 | biostudies-literature
2013-12-09 | E-GEOD-46269 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC7653673 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4118747 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4142682 | biostudies-literature
2013-12-09 | E-GEOD-46267 | biostudies-arrayexpress