Dataset Information

Impact of Adding Telephone-Based Care Coordination to Standard Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Counseling Post-hospital Discharge: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cessation counseling and pharmacotherapy are recommended for hospitalized smokers, but better coordination between cessation counselors and providers might improve utilization of pharmacotherapy and enhance smoking cessation.

Objective

To compare smoking cessation counseling combined with care coordination post-hospitalization to counseling alone on uptake of pharmacotherapy and smoking cessation.

Design

Unblinded, randomized clinical trial PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized smokers referred from primarily rural hospitals INTERVENTIONS: Counseling only (C) consisted of telephone counseling provided during the hospitalization and post-discharge. Counseling with care coordination (CCC) provided similar counseling supplemented by feedback to the smoker's health care team and help for the smoker in obtaining pharmacotherapy. At 6 months post-hospitalization, persistent smokers were re-engaged with either CCC or C.

Main measures

Utilization of pharmacotherapy and smoking cessation at 3, 6, and 12 months post-discharge.

Key results

Among 606 smokers randomized, 429 (70.8%) completed the 12-month assessment and 580 (95.7%) were included in the primary analysis. Use of any cessation pharmacotherapy between 0 and 6 months (55.2%) and between 6 and 12 months (47.1%) post-discharge was similar across treatment arms though use of prescription-only pharmacotherapy between months 6-12 was significantly higher in the CCC group (30.1%) compared with the C group (18.6%) (RR, 1.61 (95% CI, 1.08, 2.41)). Self-reported abstinence rates of 26.2%, 20.3%, and 23.4% at months 3, 6, and 12, respectively, were comparable across the two treatment arms. Of those smoking at month 6, 12.5% reported abstinence at month 12. Validated smoking cessation at 12 months was 19.3% versus 16.9% in the CCC and C groups, respectively (RR, 1.13 (95% CI, 0.80, 1.61)).

Conclusion

Supplemental care coordination, provided by counselors outside of the health care team, failed to improve smoking cessation beyond that achieved by cessation counseling alone. Re-engagement of smokers 6 months post-discharge can lead to new quitters, at which time care coordination might facilitate use of prescription medications.

Trial registration

NCT01063972.

SUBMITTER: Ellerbeck EF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6854179 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of Adding Telephone-Based Care Coordination to Standard Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Counseling Post-hospital Discharge: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ellerbeck Edward F EF Cox Lisa Sanderson LS Hui Siu-Kuen Azor SA Keighley John J Hutcheson Tresza D TD Fitzgerald Sharon A SA Cupertino A Paula AP Greiner K Allen KA Rigotti Nancy A NA Miller Nancy Houston NH Rabius Vance V Richter Kimber P KP

Journal of general internal medicine 20190731 12

<h4>Background</h4>Cessation counseling and pharmacotherapy are recommended for hospitalized smokers, but better coordination between cessation counselors and providers might improve utilization of pharmacotherapy and enhance smoking cessation.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare smoking cessation counseling combined with care coordination post-hospitalization to counseling alone on uptake of pharmacotherapy and smoking cessation.<h4>Design</h4>Unblinded, randomized clinical trial PARTICIPANTS: Hospital ...[more]

PMID: 31367875

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn rural America, cigarette smoking is prevalent and health care providers lack the time and resources to help smokers quit. Telephone quitlines are important avenues for cessation services in rural areas, but they are poorly integrated with local health care resources.ObjectiveThe intent of the study was to assess the comparative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two models for delivering expert tobacco treatment at a distance: telemedicine counseling that was integrated into smokers' primary care clinics (Integrated Telemedicine-ITM) versus telephone counseling, similar to telephone quitline counseling, delivered to smokers in their homes (Phone).MethodsSmokers (n=566) were recruited offline from 20 primary care and safety net clinics across Kansas. They were randomly assigned to receive 4 sessions of ITM or 4 sessions of Phone counseling. Patients in ITM received real-time video counseling, similar to Skype, delivered by computer/webcams in clinic exam rooms. Three full-time equivalent trained counselors delivered the counseling. The counseling duration and content was the same in both groups and was available in Spanish or English. Both groups also received identical materials and assistance in selecting and obtaining cessation medications. The primary outcome was verified 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at month 12, using an intent-to-treat analysis.ResultsThere were no significant baseline differences between groups, and the trial achieved 88% follow-up at 12 months. Verified abstinence at 12 months did not significantly differ between ITM or Phone (9.8%, 27/280 vs 12%, 34/286; P=.406). Phone participants completed somewhat more counseling sessions than ITM (mean 2.6, SD 1.5 vs mean 2.4, SD 1.5; P=.0837); however, participants in ITM were significantly more likely to use cessation medications than participants in Phone (55.9%, 128/280 vs 46.1%, 107/286; P=.03). Compared to Phone participants, ITM participants were significantly more likely to recommend the program to a family member or friend (P=.0075). From the combined provider plus participant (societal) perspective, Phone was significantly less costly than ITM. Participants in ITM had to incur time and mileage costs to travel to clinics for ITM sessions. From the provider perspective, counseling costs were similar between ITM (US $45.46, SD 31.50) and Phone (US $49.58, SD 33.35); however, total provider costs varied widely depending on how the clinic space for delivering ITM was valued.ConclusionsFindings did not support the superiority of ITM over telephone counseling for helping rural patients quit smoking. ITM increased utilization of cessation pharmacotherapy and produced higher participant satisfaction, but Phone counseling was significantly less expensive. Future interventions could combine elements of both approaches to optimize pharmacotherapy utilization, counseling adherence, and satisfaction. Such an approach could commence with a telemedicine-delivered clinic office visit for pharmacotherapy guidance, and continue with telephone or real-time video counseling delivered via mobile phones to flexibly deliver behavioral support to patients where they most need it-in their homes and communities.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00843505; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00843505 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6YKSinVZ9).

Project description:IntroductionSmokers benefit from ongoing cessation support upon leaving the hospital and returning to their home environment. This study examined the impact of telephone-delivered care coordination on utilization of and adherence to cessation pharmacotherapy after hospital discharge.MethodsInpatient smokers (n = 606) were randomized to receive counseling with care coordination (CCC) or counseling alone (C) for smoking cessation. Both groups received written materials and telephone-based cessation counseling during hospitalization and postdischarge. CCC recipients received help in selecting, obtaining, and refilling affordable pharmacotherapy prescriptions during and after hospitalization. Study outcomes included self-reported utilization, duration of use, and type of medication during the 3 months postdischarge.ResultsOf the 487 (80%) of participants completing 3-month follow-up, 211 (43.3%) reported using cessation pharmacotherapy postdischarge; this did not differ by study arm (CCC: 44.7%, C: 42.0%, p = .55). Use of pharmacotherapy postdischarge was associated with smoking at least 20 cigarettes/day at baseline (odds ratio [OR]: 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-2.19) and receipt of pharmacotherapy during hospitalization (OR: 4.00; 95% CI: 2.39-6.89). Smokers with Medicaid (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.32-4.02) or other insurance (OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.01-2.86) were more likely to use pharmacotherapy postdischarge than those with no health care coverage. Less than one in four (23.8% of CCC; 22.2% of C) continued pharmacotherapy beyond 4 weeks.ConclusionsSupplemental care coordination did not improve use of postdischarge pharmacotherapy beyond that of inpatient treatment and behavioral counseling. Insurance coverage and use of medications during the hospitalization are associated with higher use of evidence-based treatment postdischarge.ImplicationsMany hospitalized smokers do not receive the benefits of cessation pharmacotherapy postdischarge and telephone quitline programs often fail to help smokers procure pharmacotherapy. Thus, effective strategies are needed to improve utilization and adherence to evidence-based cessation therapies when smokers leave the hospital. We found that use of postdischarge pharmacotherapy was strongly associated with receipt of pharmacotherapy during the hospitalization and with the availability of insurance to cover the costs of treatment. Additional efforts to coordinate pharmacotherapy services did not improve either utilization or adherence to therapy.

Project description:ImportanceEvidence-based pharmacotherapy and behavioral therapy could increase tobacco abstinence but are underused and require further investigation.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a novel mobile health (mHealth) profiling via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in personalizing smoking cessation intervention for individuals who use tobacco with no intention to use smoking cessation services and medications.Design, setting, and participantsA 2-arm, assessor-blind, individual-randomized clinical trial was conducted. With online recruitment through social media or email advertisement, 459 adults with daily tobacco use in Hong Kong were recruited from March 23, 2022, to January 4, 2023, with follow-up completed by July 4, 2023. Individuals who had not used smoking cessation services or medications in the preceding 7 days and had no intention to use these aids in the next month were included. Participants were randomized 1:1 to intervention (n = 231) or control (n = 228) groups.InterventionsBoth groups completed 5 EMAs daily for 7 days to report smoking behaviors and triggers. The intervention group additionally received nurse-led telephone counseling and 10-week instant messaging support guided by mHealth profiling from EMA.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes were biochemically validated tobacco abstinence and Incremental Behavior Change Toward Smoking Cessation (IBC-S) score at 3 months after EMA initiation. Secondary outcomes were biochemically validated tobacco abstinence and IBC-S status at 6 months, self-reported 7-day point prevalence, abstinence, and use of smoking cessation medications and services at 3 and 6 months after EMA initiation. Intention-to-treat analysis was used.ResultsThe study included 459 participants (304 males [66.2%]) with a mean (SD) age of 36.7 (10.7) years. Biochemically validated tobacco abstinence rates were 8.2% in the intervention group and 3.5% in the control group (odds ratio [OR], 2.46; 95% CI, 1.06 to 5.75; P = .04) at 3-month follow-up. The corresponding rates at 6-month follow-up were 9.5% and 4.0% (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.15-5.70; P = .02). The intervention group showed a greater increase in IBC-S scores from baseline to both 3-month (β = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.46-1.59; P < .001) and 6-month (β = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.37-1.53; P = .001) follow-ups.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that telephone counseling and instant messaging support, guided by mHealth profiling, increased tobacco abstinence vs EMA alone. This intervention may be used to supplement conventional smoking cessation for individuals who use tobacco and are unwilling to use smoking cessation aids.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05212220.

Dataset Information

Impact of Adding Telephone-Based Care Coordination to Standard Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Counseling Post-hospital Discharge: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background

Objective

Design

Main measures

Key results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Impact of Adding Telephone-Based Care Coordination to Standard Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Counseling Post-hospital Discharge: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets