Questionable Dystonia in Essential Tremor Plus: A Video-Based Assessment of 19 Patients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Pandey S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6856448 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Questionable Dystonia in Essential Tremor Plus: A Video-Based Assessment of 19 Patients.
Pandey Sanjay S Bhattad Sonali S
Movement disorders clinical practice 20191023 8
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC4886201 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveOcular palatal tremor typically develops after a breach in the Guillian-Mollaret triangle. We herein describe a variant of this syndrome in which dystonia is also present, hence called, here, ocular palatal tremor plus dystonia.MethodsWe assessed eye-head movements and dystonia in six patients with ocular palatal plus dystonia.ResultsAmong six patients with ocular palatal tremor two had focal dystonia, three had multifocal dystonia, and one had generalized dystonia. The dystonia affected the upper extremities and neck in four patients, the lower extremities in three and the face in two. Three out of four cervical dystonia patients had head tremor. Two patients also had speech involvement. Lack of correlation between eye and head oscillations suggested that head oscillations were not compensatory or secondary to the eye oscillations and vice versa.ConclusionsWe describe a novel variant of ocular palatal tremor with dystonia. We speculate that in such variant the dystonia is possibly could be a result of abnormal cerebellar outflow in patients with a breach in Guillain-Mollaret triangle.
| S-EPMC4753074 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Essential tremor (ET) plus is a new tremor classification that was introduced in 2018 by a task force of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Patients with ET plus meet the criteria for ET but have one or more additional systemic or neurologic signs of uncertain significance or relevance to tremor ("soft signs"). Soft signs are not sufficient to diagnose another tremor syndrome or movement disorder, and soft signs in ET plus are known to have poor interrater reliability and low diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the clinical significance of ET plus must be interpreted probabilistically when judging whether a patient is more likely to have ET or a combined tremor syndrome, such as dystonic tremor. Such a probabilistic interpretation is possible with Bayesian analysis. This review presents a Bayesian analysis of ET plus in patients suspected of having ET versus a dystonic tremor syndrome, which is the most common differential diagnosis in patients referred for ET. Bayesian analysis of soft signs provides an estimate of the probability that a patient with possible ET is more likely to have an alternative diagnosis. ET plus is a distinct tremor classification and should not be viewed as a subtype of ET. ET plus covers a more-comprehensive phenotyping of people with possible ET, and the clinical interpretation of ET plus is enhanced with Bayesian analysis of associated soft signs.
| S-EPMC8926770 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction: Essential tremor (ET) is a tremor syndrome characterized by bilateral, upper limb action tremor. Essential tremor-plus (ET-plus) describes ET patients with additional neurologic signs. It is unknown whether there is a difference in response to treatment with ventralis intermedius nucleus deep brain stimulation (VIM DBS) in patients with ET and ET-plus. Due to potential variability in underlying etiology in ET-plus, there is a concern that ET-plus patients may have worse outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify whether patients with ET-plus have worse tremor outcomes after VIM DBS than patients with ET. Methods: This is a retrospective chart and video review evaluating VIM DBS outcomes by comparing changes from baseline in the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale Part B (FTM-B) for the treated limb between patients with ET and ET-plus at follow-up examinations. Patients were re-classified as having ET or ET-plus using pre-operative examination videos by two independent movement disorders neurologists blinded to patient characteristics. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated for correlations and potential predictors of treatment response. Results: Twenty-six patients were included: 13 with ET, 13 with ET-plus. There were no significant differences in the change in FTM-B scores between the ET and ET-plus patients at each follow-up examination. None of the included patients developed new symptoms compatible with dystonia, parkinsonism or gait disturbances. Conclusions: Patients with ET-plus had tremor improvement from VIM DBS, with no differences when compared to those with ET, without emergence of postoperative neurological issues. Patients with ET-plus should still be considered good candidates for VIM DBS for treatment of tremor.
| S-EPMC8666686 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC4426452 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:Physical examination findings of dystonia are often underrecognized, especially in the setting of other movement disorders such as essential tremor (ET). Phenomenology Shown:A patient with ET exhibited numerous textbook features of cervical dystonia, which were misattributed to ET by a primary care physician and two neurologists. Educational Value:To provide a clear and unmistakable visual example of the clinically significant characteristics of cervical dystonia in the setting of concomitant ET.
| S-EPMC6939647 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8564824 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlthough ET is a phenomenologically heterogeneous condition, thalamic DBS appears to be equally effective across subtypes. We hypothesized stimulation sites optimized for individuals with essential tremor (ET) would differ from individuals with essential tremor plus syndrome (ET-plus). We examined group differences in optimal stimulation sites within the ventral thalamus and their overlap of with relevant white matter tracts. By capturing these differences, we sought to determine whether ET subtypes are associated with anatomically distinct neural pathways.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on ET patients undergoing VIM DBS at MUSC between 01/2012 and 02/2022. Clinical, demographic, neuroimaging, and DBS stimulation parameter data were collected. Clinical characteristics and pre-DBS videos were reviewed to classify ET and ET-plus cohorts. Patients in ET-plus cohorts were further divided into ET with dystonia, ET with ataxia, and ET with others. DBS leads were reconstructed using Lead-DBS and the volume of tissue activated (VTA) overlap was performed using normative connectomes. Tremor improvement was measured by reduction in a subscore of tremor rating scale (TRS) post-DBS lateralized to the more affected limb.ResultsSixty-eight ET patients were enrolled after initial screening, of these 10 ET and 24 ET-plus patients were included in the final analyses. ET group had an earlier age at onset (p = 0.185) and underwent surgery at a younger age (p = 0.096). Both groups achieved effective tremor control. No significant differences were found in lead placement or VTA overlap within ventral thalamus. The VTA center of gravity (COG) in the ET-plus cohort was located dorsal to that of the ET cohort. No significant differences were found in VTA overlap with the dentato-rubral-thalamic (DRTT) tracts or the ansa lenticularis. Dystonia was more prevalent than ataxia in the ET-plus subgroups (n = 18 and n = 5, respectively). ET-plus with dystonia subgroup had a more medial COG compared to ET-plus with ataxia.ConclusionVIM DBS therapy is efficacious in patients with ET and ET-plus. There were no significant differences in optimal stimulation site or VTA overlap with white-matter tracts between ET, ET-plus and ET-plus subgroups.
| S-EPMC10644388 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6353376 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients with upper limb action tremor frequently exhibit additional neurological signs of uncertain significance. Clinicians vary in their interpretation, and interrater agreement on the final diagnosis is poor.ObjectivesA new clinical tool for assessing the presence or absence of clinical signs that are important in axis-1 classification of tremor patients is introduced: the Standardized Tremor Elements Assessment (STEA). Interrater agreement is determined, and signs leading to disagreement in the final diagnosis are identified.MethodsThree tremor-focussed and one dystonia-focussed movement disorder specialists rated 59 videos of patients with upper limb action tremor syndromes using STEA. Interrater agreements for final diagnosis and STEA items were calculated.ResultsInterrater agreement regarding the final diagnosis was higher within the group of tremor specialists and poor between dystonia and tremor specialists. Greater agreement was found for items characterizing tremor than for signs of dystonia.ConclusionsClinical signs leading to diagnostic disagreement were identified with STEA, and STEA should therefore be useful in future studies of diagnostic disagreement. The thresholds for considering neurological signs as soft versus significant for ataxia, parkinsonism, dystonia, etc. are critically important in tremor classification and must be studied across movement disorder subspecialties, not simply within a pool of tremor specialists.
| S-EPMC8015892 | biostudies-literature