Dataset Information

Adults With Incident Accelerated Knee Osteoarthritis Are More Likely to Use Pharmacological Treatment Options and Receive Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine if people with incident accelerated knee osteoarthritis (AKOA) were more likely to receive a pharmacological treatment or arthroscopic knee surgery than those with typical knee osteoarthritis (KOA) or no KOA.

Methods

We conducted a nested cohort study using data from baseline and the first 8 years of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Eligible participants had no radiographic KOA at baseline (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] < 2). We classified three groups using KL grades: 1) AKOA: knee progressed to advanced-stage KOA (KL 3/4) in 4 years or less, 2) typical KOA: knee increased in KL grade by 8 years (excluding AKOA), and 3) No KOA: no change in KL grade by 8 years. The outcome was self-reported arthroscopic knee surgery or a pharmacological treatment option: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), hyaluronic acid injections, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, or prescription analgesics. Between-group differences in therapeutic use were evaluated with Chi-square tests.

Results

Adults who developed AKOA (n = 92) were more likely to report arthroscopic knee surgery (AKOA: 32%, KOA [n = 380]: 8%, no KOA [n = 875]: 3%; P < 0.001), hyaluronic acid injections (AKOA: 10%, KOA: 4%, no KOA: 1%; P < 0.001), intra-articular corticosteroid injections (AKOA: 30%, KOA: 7%, no KOA: 4%; P < 0.001), and NSAID use (over the counter: AKOA: 65%, KOA: 48%, and no KOA: 46%; P = 0.003; prescription: AKOA: 61%, KOA: 43%, no KOA: 41%; P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Adults with AKOA are more likely to receive pharmacological treatment or arthroscopic knee surgery than their peers. Adults with AKOA are an important patient population that is understudied in clinical research despite their use of greater health care resources.

SUBMITTER: Davis JE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6857962 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveSubjective crepitus is the reporting of hearing grating, cracking, or popping sounds in and/or around a joint. We aimed to evaluate whether there is an association between crepitus and incident symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), a multicenter longitudinal US cohort.MethodsKnees without baseline symptomatic OA were included. Crepitus frequency was assessed using a question from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score at baseline and at 12, 24, and 36 months. Frequent knee pain and radiographs were assessed at baseline and at annual visits up to 48 months. Radiographic OA was defined as a tibiofemoral Kellgren/Lawrence grade ?2. Symptomatic OA was defined as a knee with both frequent symptoms and radiographic OA. We performed a repeated-measures analysis with a predictor of crepitus and outcome of incident symptomatic OA, adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), with those never reporting crepitus as the referent group.ResultsThere were a total of 3,495 participants (42.2% male), with mean ± SD age of 61.1 ± 9.2 years and a mean ± SD BMI of 28.2 ± 4.7 kg/m². The odds of incident symptomatic OA were higher with greater frequency of crepitus (never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always, with adjusted odds ratios of (referent), 1.5, 1.8, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively; P < 0.0001 for trend). The group with radiographic OA at OAI baseline but without symptoms contributed 26% of the observations but more than 75% of the incident symptomatic OA cases.ConclusionIn those without symptomatic OA, subjective knee crepitus predicts incident symptomatic OA longitudinally, with most cases occurring in those with preexisting tibiofemoral radiographic OA but without frequent knee pain. However, an important limitation is that patellofemoral OA was not systematically evaluated within the OAI. Subjective crepitus offers utility for the identification of at-risk individuals, predictive modeling, and future research.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease with a substantial public health burden. Quantitative assessments of periarticular bone may be a biomarker capable of monitoring early disease progression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether measures of periarticular bone associate with longitudinal structural progression. METHODS:We conducted a 12-18 months longitudinal study using the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Participants received knee dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), trabecular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and x-rays. Knee DXAs generated proximal tibial medial:lateral periarticular bone mineral density (paBMD) measures. Proximal tibial trabecular MR images were assessed for trabecular morphometry: apparent bone volume fraction (BVF), trabecular number, thickness, and spacing. Weight-bearing x-rays were assessed for medial tibiofemoral joint space narrowing (JSN). Chi-squared analyses assessed whether periarticular bone measures were predictive of worsening medial tibiofemoral JSN, adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS:In all, 444 participants, mean age 64.2 ± 9.2 years, BMI 29.5 ± 4.6kg/m2, and 52% male at baseline. Medial JSN (radiographic progression) occurred in 40 participants (9%). Higher baseline medial:lateral paBMD, apparent BVF, trabecular number and thickness, and lower baseline and decreased trabecular spacing were all associated with more progression of JSN in the medial compartment. From lowest to highest baseline medial:lateral paBMD quartile groups, 2%, 5%, 11%, and 18% had medial JSN progression, respectively, between the 36- and 48-month visits, p-values = 0.001 and 0.002 unadjusted and adjusted. The rate of change in medial:lateral paBMD, apparent BVF, and spacing were associated with more medial JSN. For rate of medial:lateral paBMD change from lowest to highest quartile, the proportion of each group that experienced medial JSN progression were 5%, 5%, 11%, and 18%, with an unadjusted and adjusted p-value of 0.005. CONCLUSION:Baseline and most rates of periarticular bone change associate with knee OA structural progression, highlighting the close relationship between subchondral bone and JSN. Future studies should focus on developing these measures as predictive and pathophysiological biomarkers, and evaluating their deployment in clinical trials testing bone-targeted therapeutics.

Project description:ObjectiveWe aimed to describe the natural history leading to end-stage knee osteoarthritis (esKOA), focusing on knee symptoms, radiographic severity, and the presence of limited mobility or instability.MethodsWe performed knee-based analyses of Osteoarthritis Initiative data from 7691 knees (4165 participants). We used a validated definition of esKOA that relied on meeting one of two criteria: (1) severe radiographic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade=4) with moderate-to-intense pain (Likert WOMAC pain+function>11/88) or (2) KL grade<4 with intense or severe pain (WOMAC pain+function>22) and limited mobility (flexion contracture≥5°) or instability (based on a varus and valgus stress test). We also introduced an alternate definition of esKOA that relied on meeting one of two criteria that omitted physical exam findings:(1) severe radiographic knee osteoarthritis (KL grade=4) with at least moderate symptoms or (2) KL grade=2 or 3 with intense or severe symptoms and persistent knee pain (frequent knee pain during three or more months in the past year). We used descriptive statistics to explore the frequency of components of esKOA at the index visit when they had incident esKOA, at the annual visit before developing esKOA, and the interval change between those visits.ResultsOur analytic sample was mostly female (58%), without radiographic knee osteoarthritis (KL grade=0 or 1; 60%), without stability or mobility concerns (91%), and without persistent knee pain (77%). At the visit before incident esKOA, most knees already had moderate-to-severe radiographic osteoarthritis using the original (62%) or alternate (50%) definition (versus <15% for either definition of no esKOA). Over 80% of knees that reached the criteria for esKOA achieved this based on increased knee symptom severity - typically without worsening radiographic severity (80%).ConclusionRadiographic severity predisposed a knee to esKOA. However, worsening knee symptoms led to the development of incident esKOA. If investigators want to increase the chance of identifying incident esKOA as an outcome, they should enrich their study samples with people with moderate-to-severe radiographic osteoarthritis. Our findings also highlight the potential reversibility of esKOA (a knee that is classified with esKOA but later is not classified with esKOA). Reversibility is not a flaw of an outcome defining esKOA but rather a desirable clinical outcome to demonstrate a therapeutic intervention can help people with esKOA improve their knee symptoms and delay a knee replacement.