Dataset Information

Direct costs of overdiagnosed asthma: a longitudinal, population-based cohort study in British Columbia, Canada.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:A current diagnosis of asthma cannot be objectively confirmed in many patients with physician-diagnosed asthma. Estimates of resource use in overdiagnosed cases of asthma are necessary to measure the burden of overdiagnosis and to evaluate strategies to reduce this burden. We assessed differences in asthma-related healthcare resource use between patients with a confirmed asthma diagnosis and those with asthma ruled out. DESIGN:Population-based, prospective cohort study. SETTING:Participants were recruited through random-digit dialling of both landlines and mobile phones in the province of British Columbia, Canada. PARTICIPANTS:We included 345 individuals ?12 years of age with a self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma. The diagnosis of asthma was reassessed at the end of 12?months of follow-up using a structured algorithm, which included a bronchodilator reversibility test, methacholine challenge test, and if necessary medication tapering and a second methacholine challenge test. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES:Self-reported annual asthma-related direct healthcare costs (2017 Canadian dollars), outpatient physician visits and medication use from the perspective of the Canadian healthcare system. RESULTS:Asthma was ruled out in 86 (24.9%) participants. The average annual asthma-related direct healthcare costs for participants with confirmed asthma were $C497.9 (SD $C677.9) and for participants with asthma ruled out, $C307.7 (SD $C424.1). In the adjusted analyses, a confirmed diagnosis was associated with higher direct healthcare costs (relative ratio (RR)=1.60, 95%?CI 1.14 to 2.22), increased rate of specialist visits (RR=2.41, 95%?CI 1.05 to 5.40) and reliever medication use (RR=1.62, 95%?CI 1.09 to 2.35), but not primary care physician visits (p=0.10) or controller medication use (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS:A quarter of individuals with a physician diagnosis of asthma did not have asthma after objective re-evaluation. These participants still consumed a significant amount of asthma-related healthcare resources. The population-level economic burden of asthma overdiagnosis could be substantial.

SUBMITTER: Ng B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6858138 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Direct costs of overdiagnosed asthma: a longitudinal, population-based cohort study in British Columbia, Canada.

Ng Bryan B Sadatsafavi Mohsen M Safari Abdollah A FitzGerald J Mark JM Johnson Kate M KM

BMJ open 20191107 11

<h4>Objectives</h4>A current diagnosis of asthma cannot be objectively confirmed in many patients with physician-diagnosed asthma. Estimates of resource use in overdiagnosed cases of asthma are necessary to measure the burden of overdiagnosis and to evaluate strategies to reduce this burden. We assessed differences in asthma-related healthcare resource use between patients with a confirmed asthma diagnosis and those with asthma ruled out.<h4>Design</h4>Population-based, prospective cohort study. ...[more]

PMID: 31699732

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCOVID-19 imposed substantial health and economic burdens. Comprehensive population-based estimates of health care costs for COVID-19 are essential for planning and policy evaluation. We estimated publicly funded health care costs in 2 Canadian provinces during the pandemic's first wave.MethodsIn this historical cohort study, we linked patients with their first positive SARS-CoV-2 test result by June 30, 2020, in 2 Canadian provinces (British Columbia and Ontario) to health care administrative databases and matched to negative or untested controls. We stratified patients by highest level of initial care: community, long-term care, hospital (without admission to the intensive care unit [ICU]) and ICU. Mean publicly funded health care costs for patients and controls, mean net (attributable to COVID-19) costs and total costs were estimated from 30 days before to 120 days after the index date, or to July 31, 2020, in 30-day periods for patients still being followed by the start of each period.ResultsWe identified 2465 matched people with a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 in BC and 28 893 in Ontario. Mean age was 53.4 (standard deviation [SD] 21.8) years (BC) and 53.7 (SD 22.7) years (Ontario); 55.7% (BC) and 56.1% (Ontario) were female. Net costs in the first 30 days after the index date were $22 010 (95% confidence interval [CI] 19 512 to 24 509) and $15 750 (95% CI 15 354 to 16 147) for patients admitted to hospital, and $65 828 (95% CI 58 535 to 73 122) and $56 088 (95% CI 53 721 to 58 455) for ICU patients in BC and Ontario, respectively. In the community and long-term care settings, net costs were near 0. Total costs for all people, from 30 days before to 30 days after the index date, were $22 128 330 (BC) and $175 778 210 (Ontario).InterpretationDuring the first wave, we found that mean costs attributable to COVID-19 were highest for patients with ICU admission and higher in BC than Ontario. Reducing the number of people who acquire COVID-19 and severity of illness are required to mitigate the economic impact of COVID-19.

Dataset Information

Direct costs of overdiagnosed asthma: a longitudinal, population-based cohort study in British Columbia, Canada.

Publications

Direct costs of overdiagnosed asthma: a longitudinal, population-based cohort study in British Columbia, Canada.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets