Dataset Information

Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07% Versus Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension 0.3% for Post-Cataract Surgery Inflammation: A Pilot Study of Identical Dosing Regimens with Pre-Surgical "Pulse" Dose.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

This small pilot study is the first direct comparison of the currently marketed formulations of bromfenac (0.07% solution) and nepafenac (0.3% suspension) using identical dosing regimens and including an extra pre-surgical "pulse" dose in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Methods

Adults scheduled for unilateral phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation were randomly assigned to bromfenac 0.07% or nepafenac 0.3%, each given once-daily 1 day prior to surgery, on the day of surgery plus an extra dose 1 h before surgery, and for 14 days after surgery. Assessments included summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS), visual acuity (VA), and retinal thickness measured via optical coherence tomography.

Results

The study population included 49 patients (bromfenac, n = 24; nepafenac, n = 25). The percentage of patients with a SOIS = 0 (no cells or flare) at post-surgical day 15 (primary efficacy endpoint) was statistically similar between the bromfenac (57.1%) and nepafenac (50.0%) treatment groups (intent-to-treat with last observation carried forward) (P = 0.6318). The proportions of patients with an SOIS of 0 at days 3 and 8 were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the bromfenac group (23.8 and 52.4%, respectively) versus the nepafenac group (0.0 and 20.8%, respectively). Visual acuity was similar between groups at each study visit, as were mean retinal thickness and change from baseline in retinal thickness. Rescue medication (typically difluprednate) was given on or before day 15 to 13 patients in each treatment group (bromfenac, 54.2%; nepafenac, 52.0%). There were no adverse events considered to be related to either treatment.

Conclusions

The results of this small pilot study suggest that once-daily bromfenac 0.07% produces similar benefits with regard to postsurgical inflammation, VA, and retinal thickness as once-daily nepafenac 0.3%, and possibly has a faster onset of anti-inflammatory action, when compared using identical dosing regimens.

Funding

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.

Trial registration

NCT03886779.

SUBMITTER: Silverstein SM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6858409 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% dosed once daily in achieving zero-to-trace (0-5 cells) anterior chamber cells, following cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS:The study designed employed two Phase III, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trials of 440 subjects, randomized to either bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% (n=222) or placebo (n=218). Subjects self-dosed once daily, beginning 1 day before undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation (day -1) and again on the day of surgery (day 0) and for 14 days postoperatively. Follow-up was on days 1, 3, 8, and 15. The outcome measures included the percentage of subjects with zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells at each visit, as determined by the percentage of subjects with ?5 anterior chamber cells, overall anterior chamber cell grades, and summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS) (combined anterior chamber cell and flare scores). RESULTS:The proportion of subjects with zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells was significantly higher in the bromfenac 0.07% group compared with the placebo group as early as day 3 (P=0.0007), continued at day 8 (P<0.0001), and through day 15 (P<0.0001). At day 15, 80.2% of subjects in the bromfenac 0.07% group achieved zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells compared with 47.2% of subjects who did so in the placebo group. The overall anterior chamber cell scores were significantly lower in the bromfenac 0.07% group compared with the placebo group at days 3, 8, and 15 (P<0.0001 at each visit). The SOIS were also significantly lower in the bromfenac group compared with the placebo group at days 3, 8, and 15 (P<0.0001 at each visit). CONCLUSION:Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07%, dosed once daily was clinically effective in achieving zero-to-trace anterior chamber cell severity after cataract surgery and was superior to placebo in all anterior chamber cell severity and inflammation outcome measures.

Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate nepafenac ophthalmic suspension 0.1% (Nevanac(®); Alcon Research Ltd) in the prevention of macular edema following cataract surgery in diabetic retinopathy patients.MethodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled study of 263 adult diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy requiring cataract surgery. Patients were randomized (1:1) to instill nepafenac or vehicle three times daily beginning 1 day prior to surgery through day 90. Efficacy included the percentage of patients who developed macular edema (≥30% increase in central subfield macular thickness from baseline) and the percentage of patients with decreases of more than five letters in best-corrected visual acuity from day 7 to 90.ResultsA significantly lower percentage of patients in the nepafenac group developed macular edema relative to patients in the vehicle group (3.2% versus 16.7%; P < 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of patients in the nepafenac group had best-corrected visual acuity decreases of more than five letters relative to patients in the vehicle group on day 30 (P < 0.001), day 60 (P = 0.002), and day 90 (P = 0.006). The mean central subfield macular thickness and mean percent change from baseline in macular volume were also significantly lower in the nepafenac group versus the vehicle group at days 14 through 90 (P ≤ 0.005). No safety issues or trends were identified when dosing was increased to 90 days that negatively impacted the favorable benefit/risk profile of nepafenac.ConclusionNepafenac demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant advantages compared with vehicle in preventing macular edema and maintaining visual acuity in diabetic patients following cataract surgery. These advantages were seen at multiple time points over the course of the 90-day therapy period. There was no clinically relevant increase in risk from 90 days dosing compared with 14 days. Therefore, with a similar safety profile and benefit in preventing macular edema and maintaining vision, the risk/benefit to the diabetic patient undergoing cataract surgery appears to be positive.

Project description:BackgroundDemand for eye care has increased in recent decades in China due to rapid socioeconomic development and demographic shift. Knowledge of output and productivity of ophthalmic services would allow policymakers to optimize resource allocation, and is therefore essential. This study sought to map the landscape of ophthalmic services available in Shanghai, China.MethodsIn 2018, a government-led survey was conducted of all 86 tertiary/secondary hospitals and five major private hospitals providing eye care in Shanghai in the form of electronic questionnaire, which encompassed ophthalmic services (outpatient and emergency room [ER] visit, inpatient admissions, and surgical volume) and service productivity in terms of annual outpatient and ER visits per doctor, inpatient admissions per bed, and surgical volume per doctor. Comparisons were made among different levels of hospitals with categorical variables tested by Chi-square analysis.ResultsThe response rate was 85.7%. The Eye and Ear, Nose, and Throat (EENT) Hospital was the largest tertiary specialty hospital, and alone contributed to the highest 21.0% of annual ophthalmic outpatient and ER visits (visits per doctor: 5460), compared with other 26 tertiary hospitals, 46 secondary hospitals and five private hospitals (visits per doctor: 3683, 4651 and 1876). The annual inpatient admission was 20,103, 56,992, 14,090, and 52,047 for the EENT Hospital, all the other tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and five private hospitals, respectively. Turnover rates were highest for the EENT Hospital and private hospitals. The average surgical volume at the EENT Hospital was 72,666, exceeding that of private (15,874.8) and other tertiary hospitals (3366.7). The EENT Hospital and private hospitals performed 16,982 (14.2%) and 55,538 (46.6%) of all cataract surgeries. Proportions of both complicated cataractous cases and complicated cataract surgeries at the EENT Hospital was the highest, followed by other tertiary and secondary/private hospitals (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsIn Shanghai, public providers dominate ophthalmic services especially for complicated cases, with almost one fifth of services provided by the EENT Hospital alone, while private sectors, though not large in number, still effectively help meet large proportions of eye care demand. Optimization of hierarchical medical system is warranted to improve the efficiency and standardization of ophthalmic services.