Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Early follow-up after open heart valve surgery reduces healthcare costs: a propensity matched study.


ABSTRACT: Objectives:The objective was to assess differences in healthcare costs within 180 days after discharge from open heart valve surgery in an intervention group receiving early, individualised and intensified follow-up compared with a historical control group. Methods:A cost-minimisation analysis comparing costs from a consecutive prospective cohort compared with a propensity matched cohort. Costs related to the intervention, hospital (outpatient visits and readmissions) and general practitioners (all contacts) were included. Data were obtained from electronic patient records and registry data. A logistic propensity model was used to identify the historical control group. Main results are presented as mean differences and 95% CIs based on bootstrapping. Results:After matching, the analysis included 300 patients from the intervention group and 580 controls. The mean intervention cost was €171 (SD 79) per patient. After 180 days, the mean healthcare costs were €1284 (SD 2567) for the intervention group and €2077 (SD 4773) for the controls. The cost of the intervention group was €793 (p<0.001) less per patient. The cost differences were explained mainly by fewer readmissions, fewer overall emergency visits and fewer contacts to the general practitioner during out-of-hours in the intervention group. Conclusions:The intervention consisting of early, individualised and intensified follow-up after open heart valve surgery significantly reduced the healthcare costs within 180 days after discharge.

SUBMITTER: Borregaard B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6861062 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


<h4>Objectives</h4>The objective was to assess differences in healthcare costs within 180 days after discharge from open heart valve surgery in an intervention group receiving early, individualised and intensified follow-up compared with a historical control group.<h4>Methods</h4>A cost-minimisation analysis comparing costs from a consecutive prospective cohort compared with a propensity matched cohort. Costs related to the intervention, hospital (outpatient visits and readmissions) and general  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6237642 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9252130 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5826727 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7483316 | biostudies-literature