Dataset Information

Insights Into Intra-arterial Thrombolysis in the Modern Era of Mechanical Thrombectomy.

ABSTRACT: Background and Purpose: The role of intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis in modern endovascular therapy is not well-understood. Here, we surveyed neurointerventionalists to understand their current clinical practices and opinions of IA thrombolysis in the new era of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Method: A 24-question anonymous survey was distributed via email to the members of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. Results: One hundred and four responses were included in the analysis. Most respondents were interventional neurologists (76.9%) and had ?5-years in neuro-interventional practice (80.8%). IA thrombolytics are presently used by 60.6%. Aspiration plus stent-retriever was the most common MT approach used with IA-thrombolysis (66.0%). IA-thrombolysis was used in mainly three approaches: (1) treatment of primary distal occlusions, (2) as rescue after proximal occlusion thrombectomy, and (3) or as adjunct therapy to primary MT approach. The most frequent IA-rtPA dose was 3-10 mg, with 1 mg/min infusion rate (56.6%). 84.9% do not have a standardized protocol for administering IA-rtPA. About half (50.9%) believed there should be no time limit for administering IA lytic if there is a favorable imaging profile, while 30.2% indicated ?6 h. Most respondents (76.5%) would consider using IA-tenecteplase in a trial setting. Only 12.9% felt there was no role for IA thrombolysis in modern endovascular practice. Respondents with ?10-years' experience were less supportive of the future of IA lytic (98.0 vs. 76.4%, p = 0.006). Conclusion: IA-thrombolysis is currently used in clinical practice; however, there is no clear consensus on best practices or criteria for administration. Further studies are needed to define the role of IA-thrombolysis in the context of MT.

SUBMITTER: Castonguay AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6863970 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Insights Into Intra-arterial Thrombolysis in the Modern Era of Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Castonguay Alicia C AC Jumaa Mouhammad A MA Zaidat Osama O OO Haussen Diogo C DC Jadhav Ashutosh A Salahuddin Hisham H Zaidi Syed F SF

Frontiers in neurology 20191113

Background and Purpose: The role of intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis in modern endovascular therapy is not well-understood. Here, we surveyed neurointerventionalists to understand their current clinical practices and opinions of IA thrombolysis in the new era of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Method: A 24-question anonymous survey was distributed via email to the members of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. Results: One hundred and four responses were incl ...[more]

PMID: 31798521

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and purposeRecent data suggest that intra-arterial thrombolytics may be a safe rescue therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke after unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy; however, safety and efficacy remain unclear. Here, we evaluate the use of intra-arterial rtPA as a rescue therapy in the Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated with Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke (STRATIS) registry.Materials and methodsSTRATIS was a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusions treated with the Solitaire stent retriever as the first-line therapy within 8 hours from symptom onset. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared in patients having rescue therapy treated with and without intra-arterial rtPA. Unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy was defined as any use of rescue therapy.ResultsA total of 212/984 (21.5%) patients received rescue therapy, of which 83 (39.2%) and 129 (60.8%) were in the no intra-arterial rtPA and intra-arterial rtPA groups, respectively. Most occlusions were M1, with 43.4% in the no intra-arterial rtPA group and 55.0% in the intra-arterial rtPA group (P = .12). The median intra-arterial rtPA dose was 4 mg (interquartile range = 2-12 mg). A trend toward higher rates of substantial reperfusion (modified TICI ≥ 2b) (84.7% versus 73.0%, P = .08), good functional outcome (59.2% versus 46.6%, P = .10), and lower rates of mortality (13.3% versus 23.3%, P = .08) was seen in the intra-arterial rtPA cohort. Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ (0% versus 1.6%, P = .54).ConclusionsUse of intra-arterial rtPA as a rescue therapy after unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy was not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or mortality. Randomized clinical trials are needed to understand the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis as a rescue therapy after mechanical thrombectomy.

Project description:Background and purposeAlthough current guidelines advocate pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in all eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion before mechanical thrombectomy, there are observational data questioning the efficacy of this approach. One of the main arguments in favor of IVT pretreatment is the potential for tissue-type plasminogen activator-induced successful reperfusion (SR) before the onset of endovascular procedure.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials and observational cohorts providing rates of SR with IVT in patients with large-vessel occlusion before the initiation of mechanical thrombectomy. We also performed subgroup analyses according to study type (randomized controlled clinical trials versus observational) and according to the inclusion per protocol of patients with tandem (intracranial/extracranial) occlusions.ResultsWe identified 13 eligible studies (7 randomized controlled clinical trials and 6 observational cohorts), including 1561 patients with acute ischemic stroke (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 17) with large-vessel occlusion. SR following IVT and before mechanical thrombectomy was documented in 11% (95% confidence interval, 7%-16%), with no difference among cohorts derived from randomized controlled clinical trials and observational studies. There was significant heterogeneity across included studies both in the overall analysis and among subgroups (I2>84%; P for Cochran Q, <0.001). Higher tissue-type plasminogen activator-induced SR rates were documented in studies reporting the exclusion of tandem occlusions (17%; 95% confidence interval, 11%-23%) compared with the rest (7%; 95% confidence interval, 4%-11%; P for subgroup differences, 0.003).ConclusionsPretreatment with systemic thrombolysis in patients with large-vessel occlusion eligible for mechanical thrombectomy results in SR in 1 of 10 cases, negating the need for additional endovascular reperfusion. Tandem occlusions seem to be the least responsive to IVT pretreatment.

Dataset Information

Insights Into Intra-arterial Thrombolysis in the Modern Era of Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Publications

Insights Into Intra-arterial Thrombolysis in the Modern Era of Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets