Modular preprocessing pipelines can reintroduce artifacts into fMRI data.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lindquist MA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6865661 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Functional connectivity analysis of resting-state fMRI data has recently become one of the most common approaches to characterizing individual brain function. It has been widely suggested that the functional connectivity matrix is a useful approximate representation of the brain's connectivity, potentially providing behaviorally or clinically relevant markers. However, functional connectivity estimates are known to be detrimentally affected by various artifacts, including those due to in-scanner head motion. Moreover, as individual functional connections generally covary only very weakly with head motion estimates, motion influence is difficult to quantify robustly, and prone to be neglected in practice. Although the use of individual estimates of head motion, or group-level correlation of motion and functional connectivity has been suggested, a sufficiently sensitive measure of individual functional connectivity quality has not yet been established. We propose a new intuitive summary index, Typicality of Functional Connectivity, to capture deviations from standard brain functional connectivity patterns. In a resting-state fMRI dataset of 245 healthy subjects, this measure was significantly correlated with individual head motion metrics. The results were further robustly reproduced across atlas granularity, preprocessing options, and other datasets, including 1,081 subjects from the Human Connectome Project. In principle, Typicality of Functional Connectivity should be sensitive also to other types of artifacts, processing errors, and possibly also brain pathology, allowing extensive use in data quality screening and quantification in functional connectivity studies as well as methodological investigations.
| S-EPMC7670643 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Due to the nature of fMRI acquisition protocols, slices cannot be acquired simultaneously, and as a result, are temporally misaligned from each other. To correct from this misalignment, preprocessing pipelines often incorporate slice timing correction (STC). However, evaluating the benefits of STC is challenging because it (1) is dependent on slice acquisition parameters, (2) interacts with head movement in a non-linear fashion, and (3) significantly changes with other preprocessing steps, fMRI experimental design, and fMRI acquisition parameters. Presently, the interaction of STC with various scan conditions has not been extensively examined. Here, we examine the effect of STC when it is applied with various other preprocessing steps such as motion correction (MC), motion parameter residualization (MPR), and spatial smoothing. Using 180 simulated and 30 real fMRI data, we quantitatively demonstrate that the optimal order in which STC should be applied depends on interleave parameters and motion level. We also demonstrate the benefit STC on sub-second-TR scans and for functional connectivity analysis. We conclude that STC is a critical part of the preprocessing pipeline that can be extremely beneficial for fMRI processing. However, its effectiveness interacts with other preprocessing steps and with other scan parameters and conditions which may obscure its significant importance in the fMRI processing pipeline.
| S-EPMC6736626 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Artifactual sources of resting-state (RS) FMRI can originate from head motion, physiology, and hardware. Of these sources, motion has received considerable attention and was found to induce corrupting effects by differentially biasing correlations between regions depending on their distance. Numerous corrective approaches have relied on the identification and censoring of high-motion time points and the use of the brain-wide average time series as a nuisance regressor to which the data are orthogonalized (Global Signal Regression, GSReg). We first replicate the previously reported head-motion bias on correlation coefficients using data generously contributed by Power et al. (2012). We then show that while motion can be the source of artifact in correlations, the distance-dependent bias-taken to be a manifestation of the motion effect on correlation-is exacerbated by the use of GSReg. Put differently, correlation estimates obtained after GSReg are more susceptible to the presence of motion and by extension to the levels of censoring. More generally, the effect of motion on correlation estimates depends on the preprocessing steps leading to the correlation estimate, with certain approaches performing markedly worse than others. For this purpose, we consider various models for RS FMRI preprocessing and show that WMeLOCAL, as subset of the ANATICOR discussed by Jo et al. (2010), denoising approach results in minimal sensitivity to motion and reduces by extension the dependence of correlation results on censoring.
| S-EPMC3886863 | biostudies-literature
Project description:With the rapid advancement of single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology, many data-preprocessing methods have been proposed to address numerous systematic errors and technical variabilities inherent in this technology. While these methods have been demonstrated to be effective in recovering individual gene expression, the suitability to the inference of gene-gene associations and subsequent gene network reconstruction have not been systemically investigated. In this study, we benchmarked five representative scRNA-seq normalization/imputation methods on Human Cell Atlas bone marrow data with respect to their impacts on inferred gene-gene associations. Our results suggested that a considerable amount of spurious correlations was introduced during the data-preprocessing steps due to oversmoothing of the raw data. We proposed a model-agnostic noise-regularization method that can effectively eliminate the correlation artifacts. The noise-regularized gene-gene correlations were further used to reconstruct a gene co-expression network and successfully revealed several known immune cell modules.
| S-EPMC7961184 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A variety of preprocessing techniques are available to correct subject-dependant artifacts in fMRI, caused by head motion and physiological noise. Although it has been established that the chosen preprocessing steps (or "pipeline") may significantly affect fMRI results, it is not well understood how preprocessing choices interact with other parts of the fMRI experimental design. In this study, we examine how two experimental factors interact with preprocessing: between-subject heterogeneity, and strength of task contrast. Two levels of cognitive contrast were examined in an fMRI adaptation of the Trail-Making Test, with data from young, healthy adults. The importance of standard preprocessing with motion correction, physiological noise correction, motion parameter regression and temporal detrending were examined for the two task contrasts. We also tested subspace estimation using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Independent Component Analysis (ICA). Results were obtained for Penalized Discriminant Analysis, and model performance quantified with reproducibility (R) and prediction metrics (P). Simulation methods were also used to test for potential biases from individual-subject optimization. Our results demonstrate that (1) individual pipeline optimization is not significantly more biased than fixed preprocessing. In addition, (2) when applying a fixed pipeline across all subjects, the task contrast significantly affects pipeline performance; in particular, the effects of PCA and ICA models vary with contrast, and are not by themselves optimal preprocessing steps. Also, (3) selecting the optimal pipeline for each subject improves within-subject (P,R) and between-subject overlap, with the weaker cognitive contrast being more sensitive to pipeline optimization. These results demonstrate that sensitivity of fMRI results is influenced not only by preprocessing choices, but also by interactions with other experimental design factors. This paper outlines a quantitative procedure to denoise data that would otherwise be discarded due to artifact; this is particularly relevant for weak signal contrasts in single-subject, small-sample and clinical datasets.
| S-EPMC3288007 | biostudies-other
Project description:The preprocessing of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is necessary to remove unwanted artifacts and transform the data into a standard format. There are several neuroimaging data processing tools that are widely used, such as SPM, AFNI, FSL, FreeSurfer, Workbench, and fMRIPrep. Different data preprocessing pipelines yield differing results, which might reduce the reproducibility of neuroimaging studies. Here, we developed a preprocessing pipeline for T1-weighted structural MRI and fMRI data by combining components of well-known software packages to fully incorporate recent developments in MRI preprocessing into a single coherent software package. The developed software, called FuNP (Fusion of Neuroimaging Preprocessing) pipelines, is fully automatic and provides both volume- and surface-based preprocessing pipelines with a user-friendly graphical interface. The reliability of the software was assessed by comparing resting-state networks (RSNs) obtained using FuNP with pre-defined RSNs using open research data (n = 90). The obtained RSNs were well-matched with the pre-defined RSNs, suggesting that the pipelines in FuNP are reliable. In addition, image quality metrics (IQMs) were calculated from the results of three different software packages (i.e., FuNP, FSL, and fMRIPrep) to compare the quality of the preprocessed data. We found that our FuNP outperformed other software in terms of temporal characteristics and artifacts removal. We validated our pipeline with independent local data (n = 28) in terms of IQMs. The IQMs of our local data were similar to those obtained from the open research data. The codes for FuNP are available online to help researchers.
| S-EPMC6378808 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe choice of preprocessing pipeline introduces variability in neuroimaging analyses that affects the reproducibility of scientific findings. Features derived from structural and functional MRI data are sensitive to the algorithmic or parametric differences of preprocessing tasks, such as image normalization, registration, and segmentation to name a few. Therefore it is critical to understand and potentially mitigate the cumulative biases of pipelines in order to distinguish biological effects from methodological variance.MethodsHere we use an open structural MRI dataset (ABIDE), supplemented with the Human Connectome Project, to highlight the impact of pipeline selection on cortical thickness measures. Specifically, we investigate the effect of (i) software tool (e.g., ANTS, CIVET, FreeSurfer), (ii) cortical parcellation (Desikan-Killiany-Tourville, Destrieux, Glasser), and (iii) quality control procedure (manual, automatic). We divide our statistical analyses by (i) method type, i.e., task-free (unsupervised) versus task-driven (supervised); and (ii) inference objective, i.e., neurobiological group differences versus individual prediction.ResultsResults show that software, parcellation, and quality control significantly affect task-driven neurobiological inference. Additionally, software selection strongly affects neurobiological (i.e. group) and individual task-free analyses, and quality control alters the performance for the individual-centric prediction tasks.ConclusionsThis comparative performance evaluation partially explains the source of inconsistencies in neuroimaging findings. Furthermore, it underscores the need for more rigorous scientific workflows and accessible informatics resources to replicate and compare preprocessing pipelines to address the compounding problem of reproducibility in the age of large-scale, data-driven computational neuroscience.
| S-EPMC7821710 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data is used to study the intrinsic functional connectivity (FC) in the human brain. Recently, interest has focused on studying the temporal dynamics of FC on short timescales, ranging from seconds to minutes. These studies of time-varying FC (TVFC) have enabled the classification of whole-brain dynamic FC profiles into distinct "brain states", defined as recurring whole-brain connectivity profiles reliably observed across subjects and sessions. The analysis of rs-fMRI data is complicated by the fact that the measured BOLD signal consists of changes induced by neuronal activation, as well as non-neuronal nuisance fluctuations that should be removed prior to further analysis. Thus, the data undergoes significant preprocesing prior to analysis. In previous work [19], we illustrated the potential pitfalls involved with using modular preprocessing pipelines, showing how later preprocessing steps can reintroduce signal variation previously removed from the data. Here we show that the problem runs deeper, and that certain statistical analysis techniques can similarly interact with preprocessing and reintroduce previously removed signal variation. One such technique is the popular sliding window analysis, used to compute TVFC. In this paper, we discuss the problem both theoretically and empirically in application to test-retest rs-fMRI data. Importantly, we show that we are able to obtain essentially the same brain states and state transitions when analyzing motion induced signal as we do when analyzing the preprocessed but windowed data. Our results cast doubt on whether the estimated brain states obtained using sliding window analysis are neuronal in nature, or simply reflect non-neuronal nuisance signal variation (e.g., motion). We highlight the need to critically revisit previous work on rs-fMRI data work that may not have adequately controlled for these types of effects.
| S-EPMC10592634 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeDTI characterizes tissue microstructure and provides proxy measures of nerve health. Echo-planar imaging is a popular method of acquiring DTI but is susceptible to various artifacts (e.g., susceptibility, motion, and eddy currents), which may be ameliorated via preprocessing. There are many pipelines available but limited data comparing their performance, which provides the rationale for this study.MethodsDTI was acquired from the upper limb of heathy volunteers at 3T in blip-up and blip-down directions. Data were independently corrected using (i) FSL's TOPUP & eddy, (ii) FSL's TOPUP, (iii) DSI Studio, and (iv) TORTOISE. DTI metrics were extracted from the median, radial, and ulnar nerves and compared (between pipelines) using mixed-effects linear regression. The geometric similarity of corrected b = 0 images and the slice matched T1-weighted (T1w) images were computed using the Sörenson-Dice coefficient.ResultsWithout preprocessing, the similarity coefficient of the blip-up and blip-down datasets to the T1w was 0·80 and 0·79, respectively. Preprocessing improved the geometric similarity by 1% with no difference between pipelines. Compared to TOPUP & eddy, DSI Studio and TORTOISE generated 2% and 6% lower estimates of fractional anisotropy, and 6% and 13% higher estimates of radial diffusivity, respectively. Estimates of anisotropy from TOPUP & eddy versus TOPUP were not different but TOPUP reduced radial diffusivity by 3%. The agreement of DTI metrics between pipelines was poor.ConclusionsPreprocessing DTI from the upper limb improves geometric similarity but the choice of the pipeline introduces clinically important variability in diffusion parameter estimates from peripheral nerves.
| S-EPMC10952179 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BOLD fMRI is sensitive to blood-oxygenation changes correlated with brain function; however, it is limited by relatively weak signal and significant noise confounds. Many preprocessing algorithms have been developed to control noise and improve signal detection in fMRI. Although the chosen set of preprocessing and analysis steps (the "pipeline") significantly affects signal detection, pipelines are rarely quantitatively validated in the neuroimaging literature, due to complex preprocessing interactions. This paper outlines and validates an adaptive resampling framework for evaluating and optimizing preprocessing choices by optimizing data-driven metrics of task prediction and spatial reproducibility. Compared to standard "fixed" preprocessing pipelines, this optimization approach significantly improves independent validation measures of within-subject test-retest, and between-subject activation overlap, and behavioural prediction accuracy. We demonstrate that preprocessing choices function as implicit model regularizers, and that improvements due to pipeline optimization generalize across a range of simple to complex experimental tasks and analysis models. Results are shown for brief scanning sessions (<3 minutes each), demonstrating that with pipeline optimization, it is possible to obtain reliable results and brain-behaviour correlations in relatively small datasets.
| S-EPMC4498698 | biostudies-literature