Dataset Information

Optimization Framework for Patient-Specific Cardiac Modeling.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:Patient-specific models of the heart can be used to improve the diagnosis of cardiac diseases, but practical application of these models can be impeded by the computational costs and numerical uncertainties of fitting mechanistic models to clinical measurements from individual patients. Reliable and efficient tuning of these models within clinically appropriate error bounds is a requirement for practical deployment in the time-constrained environment of the clinic. METHODS:We developed an optimization framework to tune parameters of patient-specific mechanistic models using routinely-acquired non-invasive patient data more efficiently than manual methods. We employ a hybrid particle swarm and pattern search optimization algorithm, but the framework can be readily adapted to use other optimization algorithms. RESULTS:We apply the proposed framework to tune full-cycle lumped parameter circulatory models using clinical data. We show that our framework can be easily adapted to optimize cross-species models by tuning the parameters of the same circulation model to four canine subjects. CONCLUSIONS:This work will facilitate the use of biomechanics and circulatory cardiac models in both clinical and research environments by ameliorating the tedious process of manually fitting the parameters.

SUBMITTER: Mineroff J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6868335 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Optimization Framework for Patient-Specific Cardiac Modeling.

Mineroff Joshua J McCulloch Andrew D AD Krummen David D Ganapathysubramanian Baskar B Krishnamurthy Adarsh A

Cardiovascular engineering and technology 20190917 4

<h4>Purpose</h4>Patient-specific models of the heart can be used to improve the diagnosis of cardiac diseases, but practical application of these models can be impeded by the computational costs and numerical uncertainties of fitting mechanistic models to clinical measurements from individual patients. Reliable and efficient tuning of these models within clinically appropriate error bounds is a requirement for practical deployment in the time-constrained environment of the clinic.<h4>Methods</h4 ...[more]

PMID: 31531820

Similar Datasets

Project description:Accurate three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of myocardial infarct geometry is crucial to patient-specific modeling of the heart aimed at providing therapeutic guidance in ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, myocardial infarct imaging is clinically performed using two-dimensional (2D) late-gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) techniques, and a method to build accurate 3D infarct reconstructions from the 2D LGE-CMR images has been lacking. The purpose of this study was to address this need.The authors developed a novel methodology to reconstruct 3D infarct geometry from segmented low-resolution (Lo-res) clinical LGE-CMR images. Their methodology employed the so-called logarithm of odds (LogOdds) function to implicitly represent the shape of the infarct in segmented image slices as LogOdds maps. These 2D maps were then interpolated into a 3D image, and the result transformed via the inverse of LogOdds to a binary image representing the 3D infarct geometry. To assess the efficacy of this method, the authors utilized 39 high-resolution (Hi-res) LGE-CMR images, including 36 in vivo acquisitions of human subjects with prior myocardial infarction and 3 ex vivo scans of canine hearts following coronary ligation to induce infarction. The infarct was manually segmented by trained experts in each slice of the Hi-res images, and the segmented data were downsampled to typical clinical resolution. The proposed method was then used to reconstruct 3D infarct geometry from the downsampled images, and the resulting reconstructions were compared with the manually segmented data. The method was extensively evaluated using metrics based on geometry as well as results of electrophysiological simulations of cardiac sinus rhythm and ventricular tachycardia in individual hearts. Several alternative reconstruction techniques were also implemented and compared with the proposed method.The accuracy of the LogOdds method in reconstructing 3D infarct geometry, as measured by the Dice similarity coefficient, was 82.10% ± 6.58%, a significantly higher value than those of the alternative reconstruction methods. Among outcomes of electrophysiological simulations with infarct reconstructions generated by various methods, the simulation results corresponding to the LogOdds method showed the smallest deviation from those corresponding to the manual reconstructions, as measured by metrics based on both activation maps and pseudo-ECGs.The authors have developed a novel method for reconstructing 3D infarct geometry from segmented slices of Lo-res clinical 2D LGE-CMR images. This method outperformed alternative approaches in reproducing expert manual 3D reconstructions and in electrophysiological simulations.

Project description:In cardiac ablation therapy, accurate anatomic guidance is necessary to create effective tissue lesions for elimination of left atrial fibrillation. While fluoroscopy, ultrasound, and electroanatomic maps are important guidance tools, they lack information regarding detailed patient anatomy which can be obtained from high resolution imaging techniques. For this reason, there has been significant effort in incorporating detailed, patient-specific models generated from preoperative imaging datasets into the procedure. Both clinical and animal studies have investigated registration and targeting accuracy when using preoperative models; however, the effect of various error sources on registration accuracy has not been quantitatively evaluated.Data from phantom, canine, and patient studies are used to model and evaluate registration accuracy. In the phantom studies, data are collected using a magnetically tracked catheter on a static phantom model. Monte Carlo simulation studies were run to evaluate both baseline errors as well as the effect of different sources of error that would be present in a dynamic in vivo setting. Error is simulated by varying the variance parameters on the landmark fiducial, physical target, and surface point locations in the phantom simulation studies. In vivo validation studies were undertaken in six canines in which metal clips were placed in the left atrium to serve as ground truth points. A small clinical evaluation was completed in three patients. Landmark-based and combined landmark and surface-based registration algorithms were evaluated in all studies. In the phantom and canine studies, both target registration error and point-to-surface error are used to assess accuracy. In the patient studies, no ground truth is available and registration accuracy is quantified using point-to-surface error only.The phantom simulation studies demonstrated that combined landmark and surface-based registration improved landmark-only registration provided the noise in the surface points is not excessively high. Increased variability on the landmark fiducials resulted in increased registration errors; however, refinement of the initial landmark registration by the surface-based algorithm can compensate for small initial misalignments. The surface-based registration algorithm is quite robust to noise on the surface points and continues to improve landmark registration even at high levels of noise on the surface points. Both the canine and patient studies also demonstrate that combined landmark and surface registration has lower errors than landmark registration alone.In this work, we describe a model for evaluating the impact of noise variability on the input parameters of a registration algorithm in the context of cardiac ablation therapy. The model can be used to predict both registration error as well as assess which inputs have the largest effect on registration accuracy.

Dataset Information

Optimization Framework for Patient-Specific Cardiac Modeling.

Publications

Optimization Framework for Patient-Specific Cardiac Modeling.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets