Dataset Information

Comparison of breath sampling methods: a post hoc analysis from observational cohort studies.

ABSTRACT: In this report, we present a post hoc analysis from two observational cohorts, comparing the global breath volatile profile captured when using polymer sampling bags (mixed breath) versus Bio-VOC™ (alveolar breath). The cohorts were originally designed to characterize the breath volatile profiles of Malawian children with and without uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Children aged 3-15 years were recruited from ambulatory pediatric centers in Lilongwe, Malawi. Breath sampling was carried out two months apart (one study using a Bio-VOC™ and the second using sampling bags), and all samples were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The efficacy of breath collection was assessed by quantifying levels of two high prevalence breath compounds, acetone and isoprene, as well as determining the overall number of breath compounds collected and their abundance. We found that the mean number of volatiles detected using sampling bags was substantially higher than when using the Bio-VOC™ (137 vs. 47). Breath collection by Bio-VOC™ also yielded reduced levels of endogenous breath volatiles, isoprene and acetone, even after breath volume correction. This suggests that the Bio-VOC™ dilutes the volatiles and introduces dead air or ambient air. Our results suggest that sampling bags are better suited for biomarker discovery and untargeted search of volatiles in pediatric populations, as evidenced by superior breath volatile detection.

SUBMITTER: Berna AZ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6868761 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of breath sampling methods: a post hoc analysis from observational cohort studies.

Berna Amalia Z AZ Schaber Chad L CL Bollinger Lucy B LB Mwale Mwawi M Mlotha-Mitole Rachel R Trehan Indi I Odom John Audrey R AR

The Analyst 20190301 6

In this report, we present a post hoc analysis from two observational cohorts, comparing the global breath volatile profile captured when using polymer sampling bags (mixed breath) versus Bio-VOC™ (alveolar breath). The cohorts were originally designed to characterize the breath volatile profiles of Malawian children with and without uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Children aged 3-15 years were recruited from ambulatory pediatric centers in Lilongwe, Malawi. Breath sampling was carried out two ...[more]

PMID: 30702091

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe potential of exhaled breath sampling and analysis has long attracted interest in the areas of medical diagnosis and disease monitoring. This interest is attributed to its non-invasive nature, access to an unlimited sample supply (i.e., breath), and the potential to facilitate a rapid at patient diagnosis. However, progress from laboratory setting to routine clinical practice has been slow. Different methodologies of breath sampling, and the consequent difficulty in comparing and combining data, are considered to be a major contributor to this. To fulfil the potential of breath analysis within clinical and pre-clinical medicine, standardisation of some approaches to breath sampling and analysis will be beneficial.ObjectivesThe aim of this review is to investigate the heterogeneity of breath sampling methods by performing an in depth bibliometric search to identify the current state of art in the area. In addition, the review will discuss and critique various breath sampling methods for off-line breath analysis.MethodsLiterature search was carried out in databases MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, INSPEC, COMPENDEX, PQSCITECH, and SCISEARCH using the STN platform which delivers peer-reviewed articles. Keywords searched for include breath, sampling, collection, pre-concentration, volatile. Forward and reverse search was then performed on initially included articles. The breath collection methodologies of all included articles was subsequently reviewed.ResultsSampling methods differs between research groups, for example regarding the portion of breath being targeted. Definition of late expiratory breath varies between studies.ConclusionsBreath analysis is an interdisciplinary field of study using clinical, analytical chemistry, data processing, and metabolomics expertise. A move towards standardisation in breath sampling is currently being promoted within the breath research community with a view to harmonising analysis and thereby increasing robustness and inter-laboratory comparisons.

Project description:The BIOMED I programme Stable Isotopes in Gastroenterology and Nutrition (SIGN) has focused upon evaluation and standardisation of stable isotope breath tests using 13C labelled substrates. The programme dealt with comparison of 13C substrates, test meals, test conditions, analysis techniques, and calculation procedures. Analytical techniques applied for 13CO2 analysis were evaluated by taking an inventory of instrumentation, calibration protocols, and analysis procedures. Two ring tests were initiated measuring 13C abundances of carbonate materials. Evaluating the data it was found that seven different models of isotope ratio mass spectrometers (IRMS) were used by the participants applying both the dual inlet system and the continuous flow configuration. Eight different brands of certified 13C reference materials were used with a 13C abundance varying from delta 13CPDB -37.2 to +2.0/1000. CO2 was liberated from certified material by three techniques and different working standards were used varying from -47.4 to +0.4/1000 in their delta 13CPDB value. The standard deviations (SDs) found for all measurements by all participants were 0.25/1000 and 0.50/1000 for two carbonates used in the ring tests. The individual variation for the single participants varied from 0.02 /1000 (dual inlet system) to 0.14/1000 (continuous flow system). The measurement of the difference between two carbonates showed a SD of 0.33/1000 calculated for all participants. Internal precision of IRMS as indicated by the specifications of the different instrument suppliers is < 0.3/1000 for continuous flow systems. In this respect it can be concluded that all participants are working well within the instrument specifications even including sample preparation. Increased overall interlaboratory variation is therefore likely to be due to non-instrumental conditions. It is possible that consistent differences in sample handling leading to isotope fractionation are the causes for interlaboratory variation. Breath analysis does not require sample preparation. As such, interlaboratory variation will be less than observed for the carbonate samples and within the range indicated as internal precision for continuous flow instruments. From this it is concluded that pure analytical interlaboratory variation is acceptable despite the many differences in instrumentation and analytical protocols. Coordinated metabolic studies appear possible, in which different European laboratories perform 13CO2 analysis. Evaluation of compatibility of the analytical systems remains advisable, however.

Dataset Information

Comparison of breath sampling methods: a post hoc analysis from observational cohort studies.

Publications

Comparison of breath sampling methods: a post hoc analysis from observational cohort studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets