Dataset Information

Right-hemispheric processing of non-linguistic word features: implications for mapping language recovery after stroke.

ABSTRACT: Verbal stimuli often induce right-hemispheric activation in patients with aphasia after left-hemispheric stroke. This right-hemispheric activation is commonly attributed to functional reorganization within the language system. Yet previous evidence suggests that functional activation in right-hemispheric homologues of classic left-hemispheric language areas may partly be due to processing nonlinguistic perceptual features of verbal stimuli. We used functional MRI (fMRI) to clarify the role of the right hemisphere in the perception of nonlinguistic word features in healthy individuals. Participants made perceptual, semantic, or phonological decisions on the same set of auditorily and visually presented word stimuli. Perceptual decisions required judgements about stimulus-inherent changes in font size (visual modality) or fundamental frequency contour (auditory modality). The semantic judgement required subjects to decide whether a stimulus is natural or man-made; the phonologic decision required a decision on whether a stimulus contains two or three syllables. Compared to phonologic or semantic decision, nonlinguistic perceptual decisions resulted in a stronger right-hemispheric activation. Specifically, the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), an area previously suggested to support language recovery after left-hemispheric stroke, displayed modality-independent activation during perceptual processing of word stimuli. Our findings indicate that activation of the right hemisphere during language tasks may, in some instances, be driven by a "nonlinguistic perceptual processing" mode that focuses on nonlinguistic word features. This raises the possibility that stronger activation of right inferior frontal areas during language tasks in aphasic patients with left-hemispheric stroke may at least partially reflect increased attentional focus on nonlinguistic perceptual aspects of language.

SUBMITTER: Baumgaertner A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6869885 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Right-hemispheric processing of non-linguistic word features: implications for mapping language recovery after stroke.

Baumgaertner Annette A Hartwigsen Gesa G Roman Siebner Hartwig H

Human brain mapping 20120222 6

Verbal stimuli often induce right-hemispheric activation in patients with aphasia after left-hemispheric stroke. This right-hemispheric activation is commonly attributed to functional reorganization within the language system. Yet previous evidence suggests that functional activation in right-hemispheric homologues of classic left-hemispheric language areas may partly be due to processing nonlinguistic perceptual features of verbal stimuli. We used functional MRI (fMRI) to clarify the role of th ...[more]

PMID: 22359350

Similar Datasets

Project description:Research findings on language comprehension suggest that many kinds of non-linguistic cues can rapidly affect language processing. Extant processing accounts of situated language comprehension model these rapid effects and are only beginning to accommodate the role of non-linguistic emotional, cues. To begin with a detailed characterization of distinct cues and their relative effects, three visual-world eye-tracking experiments assessed the relative importance of two cue types (action depictions vs. emotional facial expressions) as well as the effects of the degree of naturalness of social (facial) cues (smileys vs. natural faces). We predicted to replicate previously reported rapid effects of referentially mediated actions. In addition, we assessed distinct world-language relations. If how a cue is conveyed matters for its effect, then a verb referencing an action depiction should elicit a stronger immediate effect on visual attention and language comprehension than a speaker's emotional facial expression. The latter is mediated non-referentially via the emotional connotations of an adverb. The results replicated a pronounced facilitatory effect of action depiction (relative to no action depiction). By contrast, the facilitatory effect of a preceding speaker's emotional face was less pronounced. How the facial emotion was rendered mattered in that the emotional face effect was present with natural faces (Experiment 2) but not with smileys (Experiment 1). Experiment 3 suggests that contrast, i.e., strongly opposing emotional valence information vs. non-opposing valence information, might matter for the directionality of this effect. These results are the first step toward a more principled account of how distinct visual (social) cues modulate language processing, whereby the visual cues that are referenced by language (the depicted action), copresent (the depicted action), and more natural (the natural emotional prime face) tend to exert more pronounced effects.

Project description:BackgroundThere has been increasing interest in machine learning based natural language processing (NLP) methods in radiology; however, models have often used word embeddings trained on general web corpora due to lack of a radiology-specific corpus.PurposeWe examined the potential of Radiopaedia to serve as a general radiology corpus to produce radiology specific word embeddings that could be used to enhance performance on a NLP task on radiological text.Materials and methodsEmbeddings of dimension 50, 100, 200, and 300 were trained on articles collected from Radiopaedia using a GloVe algorithm and evaluated on analogy completion. A shallow neural network using input from either our trained embeddings or pre-trained Wikipedia 2014 + Gigaword 5 (WG) embeddings was used to label the Radiopaedia articles. Labeling performance was evaluated based on exact match accuracy and Hamming loss. The McNemar's test with continuity and the Benjamini-Hochberg correction and a 5×2 cross validation paired two-tailed t-test were used to assess statistical significance.ResultsFor accuracy in the analogy task, 50-dimensional (50-D) Radiopaedia embeddings outperformed WG embeddings on tumor origin analogies (p < 0.05) and organ adjectives (p < 0.01) whereas WG embeddings tended to outperform on inflammation location and bone vs. muscle analogies (p < 0.01). The two embeddings had comparable performance on other subcategories. In the labeling task, the Radiopaedia-based model outperformed the WG based model at 50, 100, 200, and 300-D for exact match accuracy (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) and Hamming loss (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively).ConclusionWe have developed a set of word embeddings from Radiopaedia and shown that they can preserve relevant medical semantics and augment performance on a radiology NLP task. Our results suggest that the cultivation of a radiology-specific corpus can benefit radiology NLP models in the future.

Project description:BackgroundWord embeddings have been prevalently used in biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications due to the ability of the vector representations being able to capture useful semantic properties and linguistic relationships between words. Different textual resources (e.g., Wikipedia and biomedical literature corpus) have been utilized in biomedical NLP to train word embeddings and these word embeddings have been commonly leveraged as feature input to downstream machine learning models. However, there has been little work on evaluating the word embeddings trained from different textual resources.MethodsIn this study, we empirically evaluated word embeddings trained from four different corpora, namely clinical notes, biomedical publications, Wikipedia, and news. For the former two resources, we trained word embeddings using unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data available at Mayo Clinic and articles (MedLit) from PubMed Central, respectively. For the latter two resources, we used publicly available pre-trained word embeddings, GloVe and Google News. The evaluation was done qualitatively and quantitatively. For the qualitative evaluation, we randomly selected medical terms from three categories (i.e., disorder, symptom, and drug), and manually inspected the five most similar words computed by embeddings for each term. We also analyzed the word embeddings through a 2-dimensional visualization plot of 377 medical terms. For the quantitative evaluation, we conducted both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation. For the intrinsic evaluation, we evaluated the word embeddings' ability to capture medical semantics by measruing the semantic similarity between medical terms using four published datasets: Pedersen's dataset, Hliaoutakis's dataset, MayoSRS, and UMNSRS. For the extrinsic evaluation, we applied word embeddings to multiple downstream biomedical NLP applications, including clinical information extraction (IE), biomedical information retrieval (IR), and relation extraction (RE), with data from shared tasks.ResultsThe qualitative evaluation shows that the word embeddings trained from EHR and MedLit can find more similar medical terms than those trained from GloVe and Google News. The intrinsic quantitative evaluation verifies that the semantic similarity captured by the word embeddings trained from EHR is closer to human experts' judgments on all four tested datasets. The extrinsic quantitative evaluation shows that the word embeddings trained on EHR achieved the best F1 score of 0.900 for the clinical IE task; no word embeddings improved the performance for the biomedical IR task; and the word embeddings trained on Google News had the best overall F1 score of 0.790 for the RE task.ConclusionBased on the evaluation results, we can draw the following conclusions. First, the word embeddings trained from EHR and MedLit can capture the semantics of medical terms better, and find semantically relevant medical terms closer to human experts' judgments than those trained from GloVe and Google News. Second, there does not exist a consistent global ranking of word embeddings for all downstream biomedical NLP applications. However, adding word embeddings as extra features will improve results on most downstream tasks. Finally, the word embeddings trained from the biomedical domain corpora do not necessarily have better performance than those trained from the general domain corpora for any downstream biomedical NLP task.

Dataset Information

Right-hemispheric processing of non-linguistic word features: implications for mapping language recovery after stroke.

Publications

Right-hemispheric processing of non-linguistic word features: implications for mapping language recovery after stroke.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets