Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparative efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B. METHODS:The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the comparison between tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) since the date of database inception to July 2019. Two researchers independently screened and evaluated the obtained studies and extracted the outcome indexes. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS:Early on, tenofovir had a greater ability to inhibit the hepatitis B virus, I2 = 0% [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.03, 1.13), P<0.01] (96 weeks). Entecavir can normalize the ALT levels earlier, I2 = 0% [RR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.77, 0.98), P = 0.02] (48 weeks). However, there was no statistically significant difference between TDF and ETV at 144 weeks. Tenofovir was as effective as entecavir in terms of HBeAg clearance and HBeAg seroconversion, I2 = 0% [RR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.68, 1.62), P = 0.82]; I2 = 69% [RR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.54, 1.61), P = 0.80]. The difference in the incidence of elevated creatine kinase levels was not statistically significant I2 = 0% [RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.27, 1.60), P = 0.35]. CONCLUSIONS:Tenofovir and entecavir were equally effective in the treatment of patients with nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B. In addition, TDF has an advantage in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Additional RCTs and a large-sample prospective cohort study should be performed.

SUBMITTER: Chen MB 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6872143 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparative efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen Mao-Bing MB   Wang Hua H   Zheng Qi-Han QH   Zheng Xu-Wen XW   Fan Jin-Nuo JN   Ding Yun-Long YL   Niu Jia-Li JL  

PloS one 20191121 11


<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B.<h4>Methods</h4>The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the comparison between tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) since the date of database inception to Ju  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4488001 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4933423 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8495544 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6167073 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9307367 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7782110 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9303406 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4249402 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8042481 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5971349 | biostudies-literature