Dataset Information

Second-line treatment of EGFR T790M-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients.

ABSTRACT: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the currently recommended treatment for advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Acquired resistance inevitably develops, with the EGFR T790M mutation comprising approximately 55% of the mechanisms of resistance following first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy (e.g. gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and dacomitinib). Patients without T790M are a heterogeneous group for whom platinum-based chemotherapy is currently recommended as a second-line treatment. In addition to secondary mutations in EGFR (e.g. T790M), the currently known resistance mechanisms can be classified into the following three categories: bypass pathways, downstream signaling pathways, and histologic transformations. Given the evolving knowledge and convenience of diagnosing acquired resistance mechanisms by next-generation sequencing and liquid biopsy, exploratory studies targeting these resistance mechanisms and incorporating immunotherapy into the treatment paradigm have become the mainstream of future development. This review focuses on acquired resistance mechanisms other than T790M that develop after first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy. Exploratory second-line treatments targeting resistance mechanisms as well as combination immunotherapy and chemotherapy in ongoing clinical trials are reviewed here. We also highlight the recent development of next-generation sequencing and liquid biopsy in this field.

SUBMITTER: Liao BC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6878608 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Second-line treatment of EGFR T790M-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Liao Bin-Chi BC Griesing Sebastian S Yang James Chih-Hsin JC

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 20191125

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the currently recommended treatment for advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Acquired resistance inevitably develops, with the EGFR T790M mutation comprising approximately 55% of the mechanisms of resistance following first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy (e.g. gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and dacomitinib). Patients without T790M are a heterogeneous group for whom pl ...[more]

PMID: 31803256

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Despite the impressive anti-tumor activity of osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, 30-40% of patients still show limited response. There is therefore a need to identify biomarkers that accurately predict the response to osimertinib therapy. In this study, 54 patients with targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA before osimertinib treatment and known T790M positivity were included. We investigated the predictive value of baseline circulating tumor DNA-derived biomarkers on osimertinib therapy. RESULTS:Baseline maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) level was not associated with objective response rate (ORR) (P = 0.886) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.370) of osimertinib treatment. T790M relative mutation purity (RMP, defined here as the ratio of T790M AF to MSAF) quartiles were found to be significantly associated with ORR (P for trend = 0.002) and PFS (P for trend = 0.006), and a cut off value of 0.24 identified two distinct prognostic groups [Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36 for low T790M RMP, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.72, P = 0.004). Additionally, although T790M relative mutation abundance (RMA, defined as T790M AF/EGFR driver AF) quartiles were not significantly associated with ORR (P for trend = 0.063), a cut off value of 0.30 also identified two distinct prognostic groups (HR = 0.43 for low T790M RMA, 95% CI 0.22-0.85, P = 0.015). However, in multivariate analysis, grouping of T790M RMP showed a better predictive value (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.20-1.05, P = 0.066) than T790M RMA (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.31-1.61, P = 0.409). Moreover, T790M RMP as continuous covariate was independently predictive of PFS (HR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.79, P =0.025), while T790M RMA was not (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.49-2.66, P =0.766). An external validation cohort further confirmed the T790M RMP was significantly associated with PFS of osimertinib therapy. CONCLUSIONS:This study established the independent predictive role of T790M RMP in NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib treatment.

Project description:BackgroundSince efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) versus chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain controversial, we performed a meta-analysis to compare them.MethodsAn internet search of several databases was performed, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database. Randomized trials that compared an EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy in the second-line setting were included. The outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3-4 toxicities. The PFS, OS for the EGFR mutation-positive (EGFR M+) and EGFR mutation-negative (EGFR M-) subgroups were pooled. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated on the STATA software.ResultsOur meta-analysis combined 3,825 patients from 10 randomized trials. Overall, EGFR-TKIs and second-line chemotherapy have equivalent efficacy in terms of PFS (HR, 1.03; 95%CI, 0.87-1.21; P = 0.73; I2 = 78.7%, Pheterogeneity<0.001), OS (HR, 1.00; 95%CI, 0.92-1.08; P = 0.90; I2 = 0.0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.88), and ORR (OR, 1.34; 95%CI, 0.86-2.08; P = 0.20; I2 = 73.1%, Pheterogeneity<0.001). However, subgroup analysis based on EGFR mutation status showed that second-line chemotherapy significantly improved PFS (HR, 1.35; 95%CI, 1.09-1.66; P = 0.01; I2 = 55.7%, Pheterogeneity = 0.046) for EGFR M- patients, whereas OS was equal (HR, 0.96; 95%CI, 0.77-1.19; P = 0.69; I2 = 0.0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.43); EGFR-TKIs significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.28; 95%CI, 0.15-0.53; P<0.001; I2 = 4.1%, Pheterogeneity = 0.35) for EGFR M+ patients, whereas OS was equal (HR, 0.86; 95%CI, 0.44-1.68; P = 0.65; I2 = 0.0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.77). Compared with chemotherapy, EGFR-TKIs led to more grade 3-4 rash, but less fatigue/asthenia disorder, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia.ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that chemotherapy in the second-line setting can prolong PFS in EGFR M- patients, whereas it has no impact on OS. EGFR-TKIs seem superior over chemotherapy as second-line therapy for EGFR M+ patients. Our findings support obtaining information on EGFR mutational status before initiation of second-line treatment.

Dataset Information

Second-line treatment of EGFR T790M-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Publications

Second-line treatment of <i>EGFR</i> T790M-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets