Dataset Information

Research ethics in inter- and multi-disciplinary teams: Differences in disciplinary interpretations.

ABSTRACT: As research teams are increasingly comprised of members from multiple disciplines, ranging from the physical sciences, life sciences, social and behavioral sciences to the arts and humanities, it is important to revisit how research is conducted at several levels. Coupled with the national concern over rigor and reproducibility in research, it is therefore crucial to ensure that all members of such multidisciplinary teams view the need for ethics in the conduct of research in similar ways. Towards this end, Wayne State University developed a course in the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) which was mandatory for all its 1500 doctoral students across all disciplines in its 75 PhD programs. We found that student perceptions of the validity, applicability and usefulness of the course varied by discipline. This was in spite of iterative changes made to the course by faculty in those disciplines to make the content palatable to all. The findings show that more work needs to be done to fully incorporate the needs of social sciences and humanities disciplines in a comprehensive university course. This is especially important as these students become members of large multidisciplinary research teams in order to uphold the highest levels of rigor, reproducibility and ethics.

SUBMITTER: Mathur A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6881010 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Research ethics in inter- and multi-disciplinary teams: Differences in disciplinary interpretations.

Mathur Ambika A Lean Sharon F SF Maun Caroline C Walker Natalie N Cano Annmarie A Wood Mary E ME

PloS one 20191127 11

As research teams are increasingly comprised of members from multiple disciplines, ranging from the physical sciences, life sciences, social and behavioral sciences to the arts and humanities, it is important to revisit how research is conducted at several levels. Coupled with the national concern over rigor and reproducibility in research, it is therefore crucial to ensure that all members of such multidisciplinary teams view the need for ethics in the conduct of research in similar ways. Towar ...[more]

PMID: 31774867

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate the interdisciplinary interobserver reproducibility of Hertel-exophthalmometry-like protrusion measurements on multidetector-row-computed-tomography- (MDCT-) images of the orbit to facilitate structured evaluation of the orbit and mid-face.MethodsRespective reproducibility of base-length along the interfronto-zygomatic line, right and left ocular protrusion, and deriving interocular difference was measured in this retrospective (04/2009-03/2020) single-centre observational study. MDCT-series and slice-positions were selected independently, using picture-archiving-and-communication-system- (PACS-) tools on tilt-corrected axial MDCT-images (slice-thickness 0.6-3.0 mm, window/centre 350/50 HU) in 37 selected adult patients (24 female, age 57 ± 13 years, average±standard-deviation) with clinical indication for Hertel-exophthalmometry, by one radiology-attending, two ophthalmology-attendings, one critical-care-attending, and one ear-nose-throat-surgery resident, respectively. Bland-Altman plots and Wilcoxon-matched-pairs-signed-rank-tests compared interobserver results.ResultsMean and median interobserver and intraobserver (radiology-attending) deviations were within 1 mm of respective averages of base-length (98 ± 4 mm), right and left ocular protrusion (21 ± 4 mm) and interocular difference (2 ± 1 mm). Relative interobserver deviations were within 2.0% of average (all patients) for base-length, and 5.0% (>80% of patients) for ocular protrusion. Pairwise interobserver comparison showed no significant differences between interocular differences of protrusion.ConclusionsRespective measurements of base-length, ocular protrusion, and deriving interocular difference show high interdisciplinary interobserver reproducibility in tilt-corrected axial MDCT-images of the orbit or mid-face.Advances in knowledgeHertel-exophthalmometry-like protrusion measurements did not depend on the years of experience or the medical subspecialty of the observer. Measurements are objective, well reproducible and important for multiple medical disciplines and should thus be included in pertinent radiology reports.

Project description:Plain English summary:Patient and public involvement (PPI) improves the quality of health research and ensures that research is relevant to patients' needs. Though PPI is increasingly evident in clinical and health services research, there are few examples in the research literature of effective PPI in translational and laboratory-based research. In this paper, we describe the development and evaluation of PPI in a multi-centre European project (EuroTEAM - Towards Early biomarkers in Arthritis Management) that included both translational and laboratory-based and psychosocial research. We found that although most PPI in EuroTEAM was centred around the psychosocial research, there were examples of PPI in the laboratory studies. As the project evolved, researchers became better at accommodating PPI and identifying PPI opportunities. It was generally agreed that PPI had a positive impact on the project overall, particularly on public engagement with the research. We concluded that the inclusion of both psychosocial and laboratory-based research in the same project facilitated PPI across all aspects of the research. In future projects, we would try to specify individual PPI activities in more detail at the project-planning stage, and better accommodate patient partners who are not native speakers of English. Abstract:Background Patient and public involvement (PPI) enhances research quality and relevance and is central to contemporary health policy. The value of PPI has been recognised in rheumatology research, though there are limited examples of PPI in basic and translational science. The EU FP7 funded 'EuroTEAM' (Towards Early biomarkers in Arthritis Management) project was established to develop biomarker-based approaches to predict the future development of rheumatoid arthritis and incorporated psychosocial research to investigate the perceptions of 'at risk' individuals about predictive testing, and to develop informational resources about rheumatoid arthritis (RA) risk. Patient involvement was central to EuroTEAM from the inception of the project. The objective of this paper is to describe the development of PPI in EuroTEAM, formatively assess the impact of PPI from the perspectives of researchers and patient research partners (PRPs), reflect on successes and lessons learned, and formulate recommendations to guide future projects.Methods Two mixed-methods surveys (for PRPs and researchers) and a teleconference were undertaken to assess the impact of PPI on individual work packages and on EuroTEAM overall.Results There was consensus about the positive impact of PPI on the research and on the experiences of those involved. In particular, the positive impact of PPI on the personal development of researchers, and on effective public engagement with EuroTEAM research were highlighted. Researchers described adapting their practice in future projects to facilitate PPI. Spin-off projects and ongoing collaborations between PRPs and researchers reflected the value of PPI to participants. PPI was more frequently integrated in psychosocial research, though examples of PPI in laboratory/translational science were also described. PRPs asked for more opportunities to contribute meaningfully to basic scientific research and for more extensive feedback on their contributions.Conclusions The findings were used to formulate recommendations to guide effective involvement of patients in future similar projects, including identifying specific training requirements for PRPs and researchers, the identification of PRP focused tasks/deliverables at the project planning stage, and supporting access to involvement for all PRPs. Importantly, the distinctive multidisciplinary approach of EuroTEAM, incorporating both basic science and psychosocial research, facilitated patient involvement in the project overall.

Project description:Interventions: Participants will be enrolled in a flexible inter-disciplinary prehabilitation programme if they are referred to surgical services after colonoscopy. The aim of this programme is to prepare participants physically, mentally, and emotionally for possible bowel surgery. The programme includes physical activity, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics, and health psychology. Each of these services will be made available to participants by experienced registered clinicians working in an inter-disciplinary team at the Auckland District Health Board (ADHB). Each of these services are described below. The prehabilitation programme coordinator will first meet with each potential participant to discuss the study, obtain their written informed consent, and assess their needs and preferences for the components of the prehabilitation programme. This is expected to take approximately one hour. The coordinator will then refer participants to services as indicated. Physical activity: Participants will be invited to complete an exercise test with an ADHB clinical exercise physiologist, to evaluate their current level of cardiovascular fitness and prescribe a programme of supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The programme involves exercising on a treadmill or stationery bike, depending on participant preference and clinician judgement. This programme is designed to efficiently increase cardiovascular fitness in 3 sessions per week for up to 4 weeks, while participants await their surgical treatment. HIIT will begin as soon as possible after participants join the prehabilitation programme, and will stop at least 72 hours prior to scheduled surgery. The duration of the programme is therefore flexible, depending on the amount of time available prior to schedule Primary outcome(s): The primary outcome is the effect size of high intensity interval training (HIIT), calculated from the percentage change in VO2Max in L/min between the initial and final CPET assessments. [Effect size of HIIT training will be calculated between the initial CPET assessment prior to the HIIT training intervention, and the final CPET assessment immediately after the HIIT training intervention and prior to surgery. This change was made before recruitment of the first participant.] Study Design: Purpose: Treatment; Allocation: Non-randomised trial

Dataset Information

Research ethics in inter- and multi-disciplinary teams: Differences in disciplinary interpretations.

Publications

Research ethics in inter- and multi-disciplinary teams: Differences in disciplinary interpretations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets