Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A New Index of Coordinated Posterior and Anterior Evoked EEG to Detect Recall Under Sedation - A Pilot Study.


ABSTRACT: EEG-based technologies may be limited in identifying recall under sedation (RUS). We developed a novel index, posteriorization/anteriorization (P/A) index, based on auditory evoked EEG signal and assessed whether it could differentiate between patients with or without RUS. Methods: EEG and BIS were sampled from 3 groups: 1. Patients undergoing sedation (n?=?26); 2. Awake volunteers (n?=?13, positive control for recall) 3. Patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA, n?=?12, negative control for recall). In recovery, recall was assessed using the BRICE questionnaire. Of the 26 sedated patients, 12 experienced recall. Both The P/A index and BIS differentiated between patients with recall and no recall. However, BIS differentiation may have been sensitive to the main drug used for sedation (midazolam vs. propofol) and the P/A index did not show similar drug-based sensitivity. Furthermore, only BIS results were correlated with EMG. Conclusion: This pilot study provided support for the association between P/A index and recall after sedation. Further research is needed in integrating the index into clinical use: (1) it should be derived by an easy-to-use EEG system with a better signal-to-noise ratio; (2) its applicability to other drugs must be shown.

SUBMITTER: Baron Shahaf D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6883081 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A New Index of Coordinated Posterior and Anterior Evoked EEG to Detect Recall Under Sedation - A Pilot Study.

Baron Shahaf Dana D   Hare Gregory M T GMT   Baker Andrew J AJ   Chenosia Violina V   Priven Leonid L   Mistry Nikhil N   Shahaf Goded G  

Scientific reports 20191128 1


EEG-based technologies may be limited in identifying recall under sedation (RUS). We developed a novel index, posteriorization/anteriorization (P/A) index, based on auditory evoked EEG signal and assessed whether it could differentiate between patients with or without RUS. Methods: EEG and BIS were sampled from 3 groups: 1. Patients undergoing sedation (n = 26); 2. Awake volunteers (n = 13, positive control for recall) 3. Patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA, n = 12, negative control for r  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6117351 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7117727 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9292470 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3917902 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3472152 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6492919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9938389 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4216412 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7374762 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9045132 | biostudies-literature