Dataset Information

Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Intraoperative Catastrophes During Robotic Pulmonary Resection.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Intraoperative catastrophes during robotic anatomical pulmonary resections are potentially devastating events. The present study aimed to assess the incidence, management, and outcomes of these intraoperative catastrophes for patients with primary lung cancers. METHODS:This was a retrospective, multiinstitutional study that evaluated patients who underwent robotic anatomical pulmonary resections. Intraoperative catastrophes were defined as events necessitating emergency thoracotomy or requiring an additional unplanned major surgical procedure. Standardized data forms were collected from each institution, with questions on intraoperative management strategies of catastrophic events. RESULTS:Overall, 1810 patients underwent robotic anatomical pulmonary resections, including 1566 (86.5%) lobectomies. Thirty-five patients (1.9%) experienced an intraoperative catastrophe. These patients were found to have significantly higher clinical TNM stage (P = .031) and lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (81% vs 90%; P = .004). A higher proportion of patients who had a catastrophic event underwent preoperative radiotherapy (8.6% vs 2.3%; P = .048), and the surgical procedures performed differed significantly compared with noncatastrophic patients. Patients in the catastrophic group had higher perioperative mortality (5.7% vs 0.5%; P = .018), longer operative duration (195 minutes vs 170 minutes; P = .020), and higher estimated blood loss (225 mL vs 50 mL; P < .001). The most common catastrophic event was intraoperative hemorrhage from the pulmonary artery, followed by injury to the airway, pulmonary vein, and liver. Detailed management strategies were discussed. CONCLUSIONS:The incidence of catastrophic events during robotic anatomical pulmonary resections was low, and the most common complication was pulmonary arterial injury. Awareness of potential intraoperative catastrophes and their management strategies are critical to improving clinical outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Cao C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6889954 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Intraoperative Catastrophes During Robotic Pulmonary Resection.

Cao Christopher C Cerfolio Robert J RJ Louie Brian E BE Melfi Franca F Veronesi Giulia G Razzak Rene R Romano Gaetano G Novellis Pierluigi P Shah Savan S Ranganath Neel N Park Bernard J BJ

The Annals of thoracic surgery 20190627 5

<h4>Background</h4>Intraoperative catastrophes during robotic anatomical pulmonary resections are potentially devastating events. The present study aimed to assess the incidence, management, and outcomes of these intraoperative catastrophes for patients with primary lung cancers.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a retrospective, multiinstitutional study that evaluated patients who underwent robotic anatomical pulmonary resections. Intraoperative catastrophes were defined as events necessitating emergency ...[more]

PMID: 31255610

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIntraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) uses a fluorescent probe to identify occult cancers. VGT-309 is a quenched activity-based probe that is activated in the presence of cathepsins, enzymes overexpressed in cancer cells, and detected by near-infrared (NIR) light. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with intraoperative molecular imaging (RIMI) using VGT-309 to localize tumors using NIR light to detect areas with increased cathepsin activity. Our secondary outcome was to compare RIMI to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with intraoperative molecular imaging (VIMI).MethodsIn a phase 2 clinical trial at the University of Pennsylvania, patients (n=10) with suspicious pulmonary lesions underwent RATS. First, white light was used followed by RIMI to identify tissues with increased cathepsin activity. Then, VIMI was performed to compare the sensitivity and PPV in identifying the cathepsin activity. The resected specimens were then evaluated for fluorescence and underwent histopathological analysis for cathepsin expression. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics software. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.ResultsRATS with white light identified 6 out of the 10 pulmonary nodules, whereas adding RIMI identified an additional 4 more pulmonary nodules. RIMI and VIMI were able to detect the same 8/10 (80%) nodules. The addition of VIMI did not identify any lesions that RIMI may have missed. The mean fluorescence intensity of tumors visualized by RIMI was 115.81 A.U. [standard deviation (SD) =58.57] compared to 95.6 A.U. (SD =14.81) by VIMI (P=0.41). The mean tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of tumors visualized by RIMI was 9.20 (SD =9.12) compared to 2.29 A.U. (SD =1.11) using VIMI (P=0.1). The sensitivity of RIMI and VIMI was 88.9% which was superior to that of RATS (55.6%). The PPV of RATS was 83.3% compared to 100% in RIMI and VIMI.ConclusionsRIMI is a valuable option for visualization of occult disease using VGT-309-guided IMI through identifying areas of increased cathepsin activity. In this small series, RIMI and VIMI showed clinical equivalence in sensitivity and PPV of detecting cathepsin activity.

Project description:ContextThe resection technique used to excise tumor during robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is of paramount importance in achieving optimal clinical outcomes.ObjectiveTo provide an overview of the different resection techniques used during RPN, and a pooled analysis of comparative studies.Evidence acquisitionThe systematic review was conducted according to established principles (PROSPERO: CRD42022371640) on November 7, 2022. A population (P: adult patients undergoing RPN), intervention (I: enucleation), comparator (C: enucleoresection or wedge resection), outcome (O: outcome measurements of interest), and study design (S) framework was prespecified to assess study eligibility. Studies reporting a detailed description of resection techniques and/or evaluating the impact of resection technique on outcomes of surgery were included.Evidence synthesisResection techniques used during RPN can be broadly classified as resection (non-anatomic) or enucleation (anatomic). A standardized definition for these is lacking. Out of 20 studies retrieved, nine compared "standard" resection versus enucleation. A pooled analysis did not reveal significant differences in terms of operative time, ischemia time, blood loss, transfusions, or positive margins. Significant differences favoring enucleation were found for clamping management (odds ratio [OR] for renal artery clamping 3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-10.88; p = 0.03), overall complications (OR for occurrence 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.87; p = 0.01) major complications (OR for occurrence 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.79; p = 0.009), length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.72 d, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.45; p < 0.001), and decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (WMD -2.64 ml/min, 95% CI -5.15 to -0.12; p = 0.04).ConclusionsThere is heterogeneity in the reporting of resection techniques used during RPN. The urological community must improve the quality of reporting and research produced accordingly. Positive margins are not specifically related to the resection technique. Focusing on studies comparing standard resection versus enucleation, advantages with tumor enucleation in terms of avoidance of artery clamping, overall/major complications, length of stay, and renal function were found. These data should be considered when planning the RPN resection strategy.Patient summaryWe reviewed studies on robotic surgery for partial kidney removal using different techniques to cut away the kidney tumor. We found that a technique called "enucleation" was associated with similar cancer control outcomes in comparison to the standard technique and had fewer complications, better kidney function after surgery, and a shorter hospital stay.

Project description:Intraoperative optical biopsy technologies may aid in the identification of important anatomical landmarks and improve surgical outcomes of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. We evaluate the feasibility of confocal laser endomicroscopy during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.A total of 21 patients with biopsy proven prostate cancer scheduled for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy were recruited. After intravenous administration of fluorescein 15 patients underwent in vivo intraoperative confocal laser endomicroscopy of prostatic and periprostatic structures using a 2.6 or 0.85 mm imaging probe. Standard robotic instruments were used to grasp and maneuver the confocal laser endomicroscopy probes for image acquisition. Confocal laser endomicroscopy imaging was performed ex vivo on fresh prostate specimens from 20 patients. Confocal video sequences acquired in vivo and ex vivo were reviewed and analyzed, with additional image processing using a mosaicing algorithm. Processed confocal images were compared with standard hematoxylin and eosin analysis of imaged regions.Confocal laser endomicroscopy was successfully integrated with robotic surgery, including co-registration of confocal video sequences with white light and probe handling with standard robotic instrumentation. Intraoperative confocal laser endomicroscopy imaging of the neurovascular bundle before and after nerve sparing dissection revealed characteristic features including dynamic vascular flow and intact axon fibers. Ex vivo confocal imaging of the prostatic parenchyma demonstrated normal prostate glands, stroma and prostatic carcinoma.We report the initial feasibility of optical biopsy of prostatic and periprostatic tissue during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Image guidance and tissue interrogation using confocal laser endomicroscopy offer a new intraoperative imaging method that has the potential to improve the functional and oncologic outcomes of prostate cancer surgery.

Dataset Information

Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Intraoperative Catastrophes During Robotic Pulmonary Resection.

Publications

Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Intraoperative Catastrophes During Robotic Pulmonary Resection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets