Dataset Information

Response to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients with BRAF non-V600-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:While mutations in BRAF in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) most commonly occur at the V600 amino acid, with the advent of next-generation sequencing, non-V600 BRAF mutations are increasingly identified in clinical practice. It is unclear whether these mutants, like BRAF V600E, confer resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:We conducted a multicenter pooled analysis of consecutive patients with non-V600 BRAF-mutated mCRCs identified between 2010 and 2017. Non-V600 BRAF mutations were divided into functional classes based on signaling mechanism and kinase activity: activating and RAS-independent (class 2) or kinase-impaired and RAS-dependent (class 3). RESULTS:Forty patients with oncogenic non-V600 BRAF-mutant mCRC received anti-EGFR antibody treatment [n = 12 (30%) class 2 and n = 28 (70%) class 3]. No significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed by mutation class. In contrast, while only 1 of 12 patients with class 2 BRAF mCRC responded, 14 of 28 patients with class 3 BRAF responded to anti-EGFR therapy (response rate, 8% and 50%, respectively, P = 0.02). Specifically, in first- or second-line, 1 of 6 (17%) patients with class 2 and 7 of 9 (78%) patients with class 3 BRAF mutants responded (P = 0.04). In third- or later-line, none of 6 patients with class 2 and 7 of 19 (37%) patients with class 3 BRAF mutants responded (P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS:Response to EGFR antibody treatment in mCRCs with class 2 BRAF mutants is rare, while a large portion of CRCs with class 3 BRAF mutants respond. Patients with colorectal cancer with class 3 BRAF mutations should be considered for anti-EGFR antibody treatment.See related commentary by Fontana and Valeri, p. 6896.

SUBMITTER: Yaeger R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6891165 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Response to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients with BRAF non-V600-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Yaeger Rona R Kotani Daisuke D Mondaca Sebastián S Parikh Aparna R AR Bando Hideaki H Van Seventer Emily E EE Taniguchi Hiroya H Zhao HuiYong H Thant Claire N CN de Stanchina Elisa E Rosen Neal N Corcoran Ryan B RB Yoshino Takayuki T Yao Zhan Z Ebi Hiromichi H

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20190912 23

<h4>Purpose</h4>While mutations in BRAF in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) most commonly occur at the V600 amino acid, with the advent of next-generation sequencing, non-V600 BRAF mutations are increasingly identified in clinical practice. It is unclear whether these mutants, like BRAF V600E, confer resistance to anti-EGFR therapy.<h4>Experimental design</h4>We conducted a multicenter pooled analysis of consecutive patients with non-V600 BRAF-mutated mCRCs identified between 2010 and 2017. N ...[more]

PMID: 31515458

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:Combining cetuximab with chemotherapy provides clinical benefit to 60% of the patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This pilot study investigated the efficacy of cetuximab-based chemotherapy in a sample of patients (40%) with RAS mutation (RAS-mt) in their primary tumor whose circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was RAS-wt. MATERIALS AND METHODS:The occurrence of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), neuroblastoma rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (NRAS), V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), and PI3KCA mutations was determined in ctDNA by using a new ultrasensitive analysis based on mass spectrometry detection. All consenting patients with confirmed RAS-mt mCRC had disease progression on previous chemotherapy that contained no anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The patients with RAS-wt ctDNA received cetuximab + fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), whereas those with RAS-mt ctDNA were treated with the oncologist's choice of therapy. RESULTS:Of 16 registered patients, 11 were male and five female. They were age 48 to 81 years, and they had unresectable metastatic adenocarcinoma from the colon (n = 11) or rectum (n = 5), with a median of two metastatic sites. They had received a median number of three previous chemotherapy protocols. Plasma genotyping identified RAS-mt in seven patients (44%) and RAS-wt in nine patients (56%). In the patients with wt ctDNA, objective tumor response rate was 50.0%, including one complete response and four partial responses after a median number of 6 courses of cetuximab + FOLFIRI (range, 1 to 16 courses). Two of the nine patients had stable disease, and two had progressive disease. No grade 3 to 4 toxicities were encountered. One-year survival rates were 60.0% for the patients with RAS-wt ctDNA and 17.9% for those with RAS-mt ctDNA. Median overall survival times were not reached and 4.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION:Patients with RAS-mt mCRC whose plasma biopsies contained RAS-wt could benefit from cetuximab-based therapy, a hypothesis to be tested in a prospective randomized trial.

Dataset Information

Response to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients with BRAF non-V600-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Publications

Response to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients with BRAF non-V600-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets