Dataset Information

Optimal acquisition scheme for flow-compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Flow-compensated (FC) diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) for intravoxel-incoherent motion (IVIM) modeling allows for a more detailed description of tissue microvasculature than conventional IVIM. The long acquisition time of current FC-IVIM protocols, however, has prohibited clinical application. Therefore, we developed an optimized abdominal FC-IVIM acquisition with a clinically feasible scan time.

Methods

Precision and accuracy of the FC-IVIM parameters were assessed by fitting the FC-IVIM model to signal decay curves, simulated for different acquisition schemes. Diffusion-weighted acquisitions were added subsequently to the protocol, where we chose the combination of b-value, diffusion time and gradient profile (FC or bipolar) that resulted in the largest improvement to its accuracy and precision. The resulting two optimized FC-IVIM protocols with 25 and 50 acquisitions (FC-IVIM_opt25 and FC-IVIM_opt50 ), together with a complementary acquisition consisting of 50 diffusion-weighting (FC-IVIM_comp ), were acquired in repeated abdominal free-breathing FC-IVIM imaging of seven healthy volunteers. Intersession and intrasession within-subject coefficient of variation of the FC-IVIM parameters were compared for the liver, spleen, and kidneys.

Results

Simulations showed that the performance of FC-IVIM improved in tissue with larger perfusion fraction and signal-to-noise ratio. The scan time of the FC-IVIM_opt25 and FC-IVIM_opt50 protocols were 8 and 16 min. The best in vivo performance was seen in FC-IVIM_opt50 . The intersession within-subject coefficients of variation of FC-IVIM_opt50 were 11.6%, 16.3%, 65.5%, and 36.0% for FC-IVIM model parameters diffusivity, perfusion fraction, characteristic time and blood flow velocity, respectively.

Conclusions

We have optimized the FC-IVIM protocol, allowing for clinically feasible scan times (8-16 min).

SUBMITTER: Gurney-Champion OJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6899942 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Pediatric retroperitoneal tumors in the renal bed are often large and heterogeneous, and their diagnosis based on conventional imaging alone is not possible. More advanced imaging methods, such as diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI and the use of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), have the potential to provide additional biomarkers that could facilitate their noninvasive diagnosis. PURPOSE:To assess the use of an IVIM model for diagnosis of childhood malignant abdominal tumors and discrimination of benign from malignant lesions. STUDY TYPE:Retrospective. POPULATION:Forty-two pediatric patients with abdominal lesions (n?=?32 malignant, n?=?10 benign), verified by histopathology. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE:1.5T MRI system and a DW-MRI sequence with six b-values (0, 50, 100, 150, 600, 1000 s/mm2 ). ASSESSMENT:Parameter maps of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and IVIM maps of slow diffusion coefficient (D), fast diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were computed using a segmented fitting model. Histograms were constructed for whole-tumor regions of each parameter. STATISTICAL TESTS:Comparison of histogram parameters of and their diagnostic performance was determined using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS:IVIM parameters D* and f were significantly higher in neuroblastoma compared to Wilms' tumors (P < 0.05). The ROC analysis showed that the best diagnostic performance was achieved with D* 90th percentile (area under the curve [AUC]?=?0.935; P?=?0.002; cutoff value?=?32,376 × 10-6 mm2 /s) and f mean values (AUC?=?1.00; P < 0.001; cutoff value?=?14.7) in discriminating between neuroblastoma (n?=?11) and Wilms' tumors (n?=?8). Discrimination between tumor types was not possible with IVIM D or ADC parameters. Malignant tumors revealed significantly lower ADC, D, and higher D* values than in benign lesions (all P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION:IVIM perfusion parameters could distinguish between malignant childhood tumor types, providing potential imaging biomarkers for their diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1475-1486.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the introduction of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model have provided a unique method for evaluating perfusion and diffusion within a tissue without the need for a contrast agent. Despite its relevance, cardiac DWI has thus far been limited by low b values because of signal loss induced by physiological motion. The goal of this study was to develop a methodology for estimating IVIM parameters of in vivo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using an efficient DWI acquisition framework. This was achieved by investigating various acquisition strategies (principal component analysis [PCA] filtering and temporal maximum intensity projection [PCATMIP] and single trigger delay [TD]) and fitting methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Simulations were performed on a synthetic dataset of diffusion-weighted signal intensity (SI) to determine the fitting method that would yield IVIM parameters with the greatest accuracy. The required number of b values to correctly estimate IVIM parameters was also investigated. Breath-hold DWI scans were performed for 12 volunteers to collect several TD values during diastole. Thirteen b values ranging from 0 to 550 s/mm were used. The IVIM parameters derived using the data from all the acquired TDs (PCATMIP technique) were compared with those derived using a single acquisition performed at an optimized diastolic time point (1TD). RESULTS:The main result of this study was that PCATMIP, when combined with a fitting model that accounted for T1 and T2 relaxation, provided IVIM parameters with less variability. However, an acquisition performed with 1 optimized diastolic TD provided results that were as good as those provided using PCATMIP if the R-R variability during the acquisition was sufficiently low (± 5%). Furthermore, the use of only 9 b values (that could be acquired in 2 breath-holds), instead of 13 b values (requiring 3 breath-holds), was sufficient to determine the IVIM parameters. CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates that IVIM is technically feasible in vivo and reports for the first time the perfusion fraction, f, and the diffusion coefficients, D and D*, for the cardiac DWI of healthy volunteers. Motion-induced signal loss, which is the main problem associated with cardiac DWI, could be avoided with the combined use of sliding acquisition during the cardiac cycle and image postprocessing with the PCATMIP algorithm. This study provides new perspectives for perfusion imaging without a contrast agent and demonstrates that IVIM parameters can act as promising tools to further characterize microvascular abnormalities or dysfunction.