Dataset Information

Accuracy of Nodal Positivity in Inadequate Lymphadenectomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Population Study Using the US SEER Database.

ABSTRACT: Objectives: The optimal number of the examined lymph nodes (ELNs) in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has been widely studied. However, the accuracy of nodal positivity for the patients with inadequate lymphadenectomy is still unclear. The purpose of our study was to determine the accuracy of the number of positive nodes reported for patients with 1-3 positive nodes and the probability that 4 or more nodes could be positive along with tumor size and number of nodes examined. Methods: We obtained data on patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed during 2004-2013 from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. An mathematical model based on Hypergeometric Distribution and Bayes' Theorem was used to estimate the accuracy. Results: Among the 9,945 patients, 55.6% underwent inadequate lymphadenectomy. Of them, 1,842, 6,049, and 2,054 had T1, T2, and T3 stage disease, respectively. The accuracy of the number of observed positive nodes increased as the number of ELNs increased and the tumor size decreased. To rule out the possibility of N2 stage (4 and more positive nodes), there should be at least 13 ELNs for the patients with 1 observed positive lymph node and 14 for the patients with 2. Conclusion: Inadequate lymphadenectomy could result in underestimation of the N stage, and this would have adverse impact on recurrence, efficacy of postoperative treatment, and even overall survival. This model combined with the observed positive lymph nodes, the number of ELNs, and tumor size could provide a more accurate determination of nodal positivity of these patients.

SUBMITTER: Wang W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6909429 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Neoadjuvant radiotherapy has been shown to improve marginal negative resection and local control of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, whether it improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic PDAC remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the benefits of only surgery, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and surgery plus chemotherapy for OS in patients with non-metastatic PDAC. METHODS:PDAC diagnosed by surgical histopathology in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2016 was selected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the prognosis of patients with different treatments. Cox proportional risk model was used to analyze independent predictors of OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to analyze the tumor prognosis of different treatment methods. RESULTS:Before PSM analysis, the OS of surgery plus chemotherapy (HRs?=?0.896, 95%CIs, 0.827-0.970; P?=?0.007) were significantly better than the other three treatments for stage T1-3N0M0 PDAC patients. For stage T1-3N?+?M0 patients, adjuvant radiotherapy (HRs?=?0.613, 95% CIs, 0.579-0.649; P?<?0.001) had significantly better OS than surgery plus chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy. For stage T4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (HRs?=?0.482, 95% CIs, 0.347-0.670; P?<?0.001) had significantly better OS than surgery plus chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. For stage T4N?+?M0 patients, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (HRs?=?0.338, 95% CIs, 0.215-0.532; P?<?0.001) had significantly longer OS than adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery plus chemotherapy. Even after PSM, Chemotherapy plus surgery was still the best treatment for T1-3N0M0 patients. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy had the best prognosis among T1-3N?+?M0 patients, and neoadjuvant radiotherapy was the best treatment for T4 patients. CONCLUSIONS:For patients with non-metastatic PDAC, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery plus chemotherapy were superior to only surgery in OS. For patients with stage T4 non-metastatic PDAC, neoadjuvant radiotherapy had the potential to be strongly recommended over adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery plus chemotherapy. However, neoadjuvant radiotherapy failed to benefit the survival of T1-3N0M0 stage patients, and surgery plus chemotherapy was preferred. For T1-3N?+?M0, neoadjuvant radiotherapy had no obvious advantage over adjuvant radiotherapy or surgery plus chemotherapy in OS, and adjuvant radiotherapy was more recommended.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a major operative intervention performed most commonly for malignancy in the head of pancreas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utilization of blood transfusion for PD and to determine whether this had prognostic significance in a subset of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on blood transfusion requirement were retrospectively collected for patients undergoing PD from 1998 to 2005. Standard prognostic factors and survival data were also collected in patients with PDAC. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-seventy patients underwent PD. Seventy-six patients (45%) received transfusion. The median (interquartile range) number of units of red cell concentrate (RCC) transfused perioperatively (intraoperatively and within 24 h of surgery) was 1.5 (0.5-2.5). The median preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) was 126 g/dl. The median number of units of RCC transfused perioperatively in patients with Hb <126 g/dl was 2 (1-3); for those with Hb > or = 126 g/dl the median was 0 (0-1); p=0.003. Forty-nine patients who were resected for PDAC were subjected to survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only posterior resection margin invasion was associated with an adverse outcome (margin positive 198 [143-470] days vs margin negative 398 [303-859] days; p=0.02). Perioperative RCC transfusion requirement was not a significant predictor of survival (transfusion 408 [214-769] days vs no transfusion 331 [217-391] days; p=0.18). Furthermore, RCC transfusion within 30 days of operation was not a significant predictor of poor survival (transfusion 331 [201-459] days vs no transfusion 317 [196-769] days; p=0.43). CONCLUSIONS: PD can be performed with a moderately low requirement for RCC transfusion; however, low preoperative haemoglobin is a predictor for the requirement of RCC transfusion. Administration of RCC transfusion does not appear to be a significant adverse prognostic factor in patients with resected PDAC.

Project description:BackgroundResection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with synchronous liver metastasectomy is still a matter of debate. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of synchronous resection of PDAC and liver metastases for curative intent at a high-volume surgical center.MethodsPatients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with synchronous liver metastasectomy (M1 resection group, n = 50) were matched 1 : 1 based on tumor and nodular stage, age, gender, body mass index and concomitant disease with two control groups (M0 resection and M1 no resection). The M0 resection group included patients who underwent PD without metastases. The M1 no resection group included patients with liver metastases who underwent palliative bypass or exploratory laparotomy without resection followed by palliative and adjuvant therapies.ResultsM1 resection group had a longer operation time, larger intraoperative blood loss, and longer postoperative hospital stay than other two groups. R0 resection rate of M1 resection group was similar to that of M0 resection group (92% vs. 94%, p = 1.000). Postoperative complications were comparable between the groups. The overall median survival in M1 resection, M0 resection, and M1 no resection group was 16, 30, and 6 months, respectively. Cumulative survival rates for 1-, 2-, and 3-year of the M1 resection, M0 resection, and M1 no resection group were 63.8%, 29.0%, and 6.7%; 94.0%, 74.4%, and 25.1%; 24.0%, 2.0%, and 0%, respectively. The survival of M1 resection group was worse than that of M0 resection group (p = 0.009), however significantly much better than that of M1 no resection group (p = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed carcinoembryonic antigen >8 ng/ml and non-R0 resection were associated with death. Multivariate analysis revealed that M1 resection group had improved survival compared with M1 no resection group.ConclusionsPD with synchronous liver metastasectomy for oligometastatic PDAC is safe and feasible, it might provide survival benefits for selected patients.

Dataset Information

Accuracy of Nodal Positivity in Inadequate Lymphadenectomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Population Study Using the US SEER Database.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets