Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Patient-specific instrumentation improved three-dimensional accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative radiographic analysis of 1257 total knee arthroplasties.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to compare restoration of mechanical limb alignment and three-dimensional component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS:Radiographic data of patients undergoing mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (n = 1257), using either conventional (n = 442) or patient-specific instrumentation (n = 812), were analyzed. To evaluate accuracy of axis restoration and 3D-component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation, absolute deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical limb alignment and planned implant positions were determined. Measurements were performed on standardized coronal long-leg and sagittal knee radiographs. CT-scans were evaluated for accuracy of axial femoral implant rotation. Outliers were defined as deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical axis of > ±?3° or from the intraoperative component-positioning goals of > ±?2°. Deviations greater than ±?5° from set targets were considered to be severe outliers. RESULTS:Deviations from a neutral mechanical axis (conventional instrumentation: 2.3°± 1.7° vs. patient-specific instrumentation: 1.7°± 1.2°; p < 0.001) and numbers of outliers (conventional instrumentation: 25.8% vs. patient-specific instrumentation: 10.1%; p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the patient-specific instrumentation group. Significantly lower mean deviations and less outliers were detected regarding 3D-component-positioning in the patient-specific instrumentation compared to the conventional instrumentation group (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Patient-specific instrumentation prevented from severe limb malalignment and component-positioning outliers (> ±?5° deviation). Use of patient-specific instrumentation proved to be superior to conventional instrumentation in achieving more accurate limb alignment and 3D-component positioning, particularly regarding femoral component rotation. Furthermore, the use of patient-specific instrumentation successfully prevented severe (>?5° deviation) outliers.

SUBMITTER: Pauzenberger L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6909617 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Patient-specific instrumentation improved three-dimensional accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative radiographic analysis of 1257 total knee arthroplasties.

Pauzenberger Leo L   Munz Martin M   Brandl Georg G   Frank Julia K JK   Heuberer Philipp R PR   Laky Brenda B   Schwameis Eva E   Anderl Werner W  

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 20191212 1


<h4>Background</h4>The purpose of this study was to compare restoration of mechanical limb alignment and three-dimensional component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.<h4>Methods</h4>Radiographic data of patients undergoing mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (n = 1257), using either conventional (n = 442) or patient-specific instrumentation (n = 812), were analyzed. To evaluate accuracy of axis restoration and 3D-component-positi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10834457 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8389957 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3478993 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6875166 | biostudies-literature
2010-04-12 | E-GEOD-21164 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC7943966 | biostudies-literature
2010-04-02 | GSE21164 | GEO
| S-EPMC7850935 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9638716 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10788208 | biostudies-literature