Dataset Information

Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of surgery of primary sites on stage IVB cervical cancer patients from a population-based database, the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER). METHODS:Propensity score matching was performed to minimize heterogeneity in patient between with-surgery group and without-surgery group. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared using the ?² or Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis included the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS:Between 2010-2015, a total of 1,139 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were included in this retrospective study. Within post-matching cohort, the median duration of overall survival (OS) in stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving CRT was 22 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 25.7%. The increasing American Joint Committee on Cancer T stage (T1 vs. T2, p=0.033, hazard ratio [HR]=1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.05-3.05; T1 vs. T3, p=0.003, HR=2.20, 95% CI=1.31-3.67; T1 vs. T4, p=0.037, HR=2.75, 95% CI=1.06-7.12) and visceral metastasis (with vs. without, p=0.038, HR=1.60, 95% CI=1.03-2.49) was reported as independent risk factors of OS. Surgery of primary sites combined with CRT tended to prolong the survival of stage IVB cervical cancer patients (p<0.001, HR=0.36, 95% CI=0.21-0.61) compared with CRT, especially for patients without visceral metastasis (p=0.005, HR=0.31, 95% CI=0.14-0.70). CONCLUSIONS:In conclusion, patients with stage IVB cervical cancer may achieve their best outcomes through CRT combined with surgery of primary sites. However, it deserves large scale prospective clinical trials to confirm.

SUBMITTER: Li H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6918894 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study.

Li Haoran H Pang Yangyang Y Cheng Xi X

Journal of gynecologic oncology 20190802 1

<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of surgery of primary sites on stage IVB cervical cancer patients from a population-based database, the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER).<h4>Methods</h4>Propensity score matching was performed to minimize heterogeneity in patient between with-surgery group and without-surgery group. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared using the χ² or Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis included the Kaplan-Meie ...[more]

PMID: 31788998

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveWe aimed to analyse the clinical value of primary site surgery in improving the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of initial metastatic cervical cancer patients.DesignA population-based retrospective study.SettingNational Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.ParticipantsWe analysed 1390 patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IVB cervical cancer with complete clinical data treated between 2010 and 2016.InterventionsPrimary site surgery.MeasuresPropensity score matching (PSM) with a ratio of 1:2 was used to balance measure covariates of comparison groups. Survival time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by the log-rank test. To eliminate the bias of site-specific metastasis, clinicopathological factors and subsequent therapy on survival analysis, subgroup analyses stratified by metastasis type, clinicopathological factors and subsequent therapy were employed to evaluate the effect of cervical surgery on survival. Combination of directed acyclic graph and change-in-estimate procedures was performed to indentified confounders, and Cox regression was used to assess the survival benefit of cervical surgery for primary metastatic cervical cancer patients. The consistency of our findings was evaluated through sensitivity analysis.ResultsMatching resulted in two comparison groups with minor differences in most variables. Pre-and-post-PSM, the median CSS and OS in the surgery group were 1.3 and 1.5, 1.1 and 1.2 times of those in the non-surgery group, respectively. Primary site surgery conferred prognosis superiority for patients with metastases to distant lymph node and other sites rather than organ metastases. After PSM and adjusting confounders, local surgery reduced the cancer related and overall mortality rates by 31% and 30%, respectively.ConclusionsSurgical procedures could promote survival in patients with primary metastatic cervical cancer and should be considered a therapeutic option for carefully chosen patients.

Project description:BackgroundCervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women, with 528,000 estimated new cases globally in 2012. A large majority (around 85%) of the disease burden occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where it accounts for almost 12% of all female cancers. Treatment of stage IB2 cervical cancers, which sit between early and advanced disease, is controversial. Some centres prefer to treat these cancers by radical hysterectomy, with chemoradiotherapy reserved for those at high risk of recurrence. In the UK, we treat stage IB2 cervical cancers mainly with chemoradiotherapy, based on the rationale that a high percentage will have risk factors necessitating chemoradiotherapy postsurgery. There has been no systematic review to determine the best possible evidence in managing these cancers.ObjectivesTo determine if primary surgery for stage IB2 cervical cancer (type II or type III radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy) improves survival compared to primary chemoradiotherapy.To determine if primary surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, for stage IB2 cervical cancer increases patient morbidity in the management of stage IB2 cervical cancer compared to primary chemoradiotherapy.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 3), MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to April week 2, 2018) and Embase via Ovid (1980 to 2018 week 16). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of included studies up to April 2018.Selection criteriaWe searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs or non-randomised studies (NRSs) comparing surgery to chemoradiotherapy in stage IB2 cervical cancers.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, abstracted data, assessed risk of bias and analysed data using standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.Main resultsWe identified 4968 records from the literature searches, but we did not identify any RCTs that compared primary surgery with chemoradiotherapy in stage IB2 cervical cancer.We found one NRS comparing surgery to chemoradiotherapy in IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancers which met the inclusion criteria. However, we were unable to obtain data for stage IB2 cancers only and considered the findings very uncertain due to a high risk of selection bias.Authors' conclusionsThere is an absence of high-certainty evidence on the relative benefits and harms of primary radical hysterectomy versus primary chemoradiotherapy for stage IB2 cervical cancer. More research is needed on the different treatment options in stage IB2 cervical cancer, particularly with respect to survival, adverse effects, and quality of life to facilitate informed decision-making and individualised care.

Dataset Information

Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study.

Publications

Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets