Dataset Information

Intraindividual Comparison between Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dynamic Computed Tomography for Characterizing Focal Hepatic Lesions: A Multicenter, Multireader Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomography (CT) and gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for characterization of hepatic lesions by using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in a multicenter, off-site evaluation.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective multicenter study, we evaluated 231 hepatic lesions (114 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 58 non-HCC malignancies, and 59 benign lesions) confirmed histologically in 217 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent both gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and dynamic CT at one of five tertiary hospitals. Four radiologists at different institutes independently reviewed all MR images first and the CT images 4 weeks later. They evaluated the major and ancillary imaging features and categorized each hepatic lesion according to the LI-RADS v2014. Diagnostic performance was calculated and compared using generalized estimating equations.

Results

MRI showed higher sensitivity and accuracy than CT for diagnosing hepatic malignancies; the pooled sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies for categorizing LR-5/5V/M were 59.0% vs. 72.4% (CT vs. MRI; p < 0.001), 83.5% vs. 83.9% (p = 0.906), and 65.3% vs. 75.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. CT and MRI showed comparable capabilities for differentiating between HCC and other malignancies, with pooled accuracies of 79.9% and 82.4% for categorizing LR-M, respectively (p = 0.139).

Conclusion

Gadoxetate-enhanced MRI showed superior accuracy for categorizing LR-5/5V/M in hepatic malignancies in comparison with dynamic CT. Both modalities had comparable accuracies for distinguishing other malignancies from HCC.

SUBMITTER: An C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6923212 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Intraindividual Comparison between Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dynamic Computed Tomography for Characterizing Focal Hepatic Lesions: A Multicenter, Multireader Study.

An Chansik C Lee Chang Hee CH Byun Jae Ho JH Lee Min Hee MH Jeong Woo Kyoung WK Choi Sang Hyun SH Kim Do Young DY Lim Young Suk YS Kim Young Seok YS Kim Ji Hoon JH Choi Moon Seok MS Kim Myeong Jin MJ

Korean journal of radiology 20191201 12

<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomography (CT) and gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for characterization of hepatic lesions by using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in a multicenter, off-site evaluation.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>In this retrospective multicenter study, we evaluated 231 hepatic lesions (114 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 58 non-HCC malignancies, and 59 benign lesions) confirmed histological ...[more]

PMID: 31854149

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundGadobenate and gadoxetate are hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents. We intraindividually compared these two agents for the characterization of focal liver lesions (FLLs).MethodsA total of 140 adult subjects were randomized to undergo two 3-T MRI exams separated by 7-14 days, one with 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate and one with 0.025 mmol/kg gadoxetate. For both exams, we acquired the same unenhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted sequences, followed by contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences during the dynamic and hepatobiliary phases (HBP) (at 20 min for gadoxetate, at 120 min for gadobenate). Three experienced unaffiliated readers independently evaluated each exam in blinded, randomized order for lesion nature (benign/malignant) and specific lesion diagnosis. McNemar test, Wald tests. paired t-tests and κ statistics were used.ResultsA total of 208 FLLs (108 malignant and 100 benign) were confirmed at final diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity for malignant/benign differentiation ranged from 91.6% to 99.1% and from 87.5% to 90.5% for gadobenate, and from 86.0% to 91.6% and from 79.7% to 83.6% for gadoxetate. Significantly (p ≤ 0.025) higher values for gadobenate were determined for all diagnostic performance parameters except for sensitivity and negative predictive value for one reader. Significantly (p < 0.001) greater accuracy and confidence for specific lesion diagnosis was achieved with gadobenate for two of three blinded readers. Interreader agreement for malignant/benign differentiation was better with gadobenate (κ = 0.91 versus κ = 0.72).ConclusionGadobenate was superior to gadoxetate for the differentiation and diagnosis of malignant and benign FLLs for two of three readers. Further confirmatory studies that include a wider representation of different types of FLLs are warranted.Relevance statementBetter diagnostic performance and greater confidence in the characterization of FLLs with gadobenate might improve patient management decisions and timings, and potentially lead to better patient outcomes.Key pointsBetter diagnostic performance for the differentiation of FLLs was achieved with gadobenate for two of three readers. Reader confidence for lesion diagnosis was greater with gadobenate. Superior dynamic phase imaging with gadobenate was crucial for accurate lesion diagnosis.

Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection and liver transplant (LT) eligibility assessment in cirrhotic patients with explant histopathology correlation.MethodsIn this prospective, single-institution ethics-approved study, 101 cirrhotic patients were enrolled consecutively from the pre-LT clinic with written informed consent. Patients underwent CECT and EOB-MRI alternately every 3 months until LT or study exclusion. Two blinded radiologists independently scored hepatic lesions on CECT and EOB-MRI utilizing the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018. Liver explant histopathology was the reference standard. Pre-LT eligibility accuracies with EOB-MRI and CECT as per Milan criteria (MC) were assessed in reference to post-LT explant histopathology. Lesion-level and patient-level statistical analyses were performed.ResultsSixty patients (49 men; age 33-72 years) underwent LT successfully. One hundred four non-treated HCC and 42 viable HCC in previously treated HCC were identified at explant histopathology. For LR-4/5 category lesions, EOB-MRI had a higher pooled sensitivity (86.7% versus 75.3%, p < 0.001) but lower specificity (84.6% versus 100%, p < 0.001) compared to CECT. EOB-MRI had a sensitivity twice that of CECT (65.9% versus 32.2%, p < 0.001) when all HCC identified at explant histopathology were included in the analysis instead of imaging visible lesions only. Disregarding the hepatobiliary phase resulted in a significant drop in EOB-MRI performance (86.7 to 72.8%, p < 0.001). EOB-MRI had significantly lower pooled sensitivity and specificity versus CECT in the LR5 category with lesion size < 2 cm (50% versus 79%, p = 0.002 and 88.9% versus 100%, p = 0.002). EOB-MRI had higher sensitivity (84.8% versus 75%, p < 0.037) compared to CECT for detecting < 2 cm viable HCC in treated lesions. Accuracies of LT eligibility assessment were comparable between EOB-MRI (90-91.7%, p = 0.156) and CECT (90-95%, p = 0.158).ConclusionEOB-MRI had superior sensitivity for HCC detection; however, with lower specificity compared to CECT in LR4/5 category lesions while it was inferior to CECT in the LR5 category under 2 cm. The accuracy for LT eligibility assessment based on MC was not significantly different between EOB-MRI and CECT.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342677 , Registered: November 17, 2017.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To test the feasibility of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a sequential imaging study for characterizing computed tomography (CT)-detected arterial-enhancing nodules that do not washout in patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:In this retrospective study, 134 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 56.8 ± 10.0 years) with 151 arterial enhancing-only nodules measuring up to 2 cm during multiphasic CT that were subsequently evaluated using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in treatment-naïve at-risk patients from three tertiary referral centers were included. Tentative diagnostic criteria for HCC and hepatic malignancy were defined as the presence of one of eight MRI features favoring HCC in combinations of the following sequences: T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T1-weighted dual gradient-echo in-phase and out-of-phase imaging (Dual-GRE), and hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBP). Typical hemangiomas and arterioportal shunts were excluded from the analysis. Diagnostic performance for HCC and hepatic malignancy was calculated and compared between the abbreviated MRI and full-sequence gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. RESULTS:Of 151 nodules (mean size, 1.2 cm) 68 HCCs and 83 non-HCC benignities and malignancies were included. The combination of T2WI, DWI, and Dual-GRE showed per-lesion sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 88.2%, 90.4%, and 89.4%, respectively, comparable to those of full-sequence MRI. Applying the same sequence combination to diagnose hepatic malignancy had per-lesion sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 86.8%, 97.3%, and 92.1%. In nodules < 1 cm, adding HBP increased sensitivity by up to 13% without compromising the specificity or accuracy. CONCLUSION:The non-contrast MRI protocol comprising T2WI, DWI, and Dual-GRE showed reasonable and comparable performance to full-sequence MRI for discriminating HCC and primary liver malignancies in CT-detected indeterminate arterial enhancing-only nodules in at-risk patients, and can be potentially used for sequential imaging in place of a full-sequence MRI. In nodules < 1 cm, HBP may still be needed to preserve sensitivity.

Project description:BackgroundState-of-the-art thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a complementary role in the assessment of pulmonary nodules/masses which potentially indicate to cancer. We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in diagnosis of pulmonary nodules/masses.MethodsSixty-eight patients with computed tomography (CT)-detected pulmonary nodules/masses underwent 3T MRI (T1-VIBE, T1-starVIBE, T2-fBLADE turbo spin-echo, and T2-SPACE). The detection rate was calculated for each of the different subgroups of pulmonary nodules according to lung imaging reporting and data system (Lung-RADS). The four MRI sequences were compared in terms of detection rate and image quality-signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and 5-point scoring scale. Agreement of lesion size measurement between CT and MRI was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The picture-SNR, lesion-SNR and CNR of each sequence were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsIn total, 232 pulmonary lesions were detected by CT. The CT showed 86 solid nodules (SNs) <6 mm, 15 SNs between 6-8 mm, 35 SNs between 8-15 mm, and 52 SNs between 15-30 mm. The T1-VIBE, T1-starVIBE, T2-fBLADE TSE and T2-SPACE sequences accurately detected 141 SNs (141/188, 75%/83.3%), 150 SNs (150/188, 79.8%/100%), 166 SNs (166/188, 88.3%/66.7%) and 169 SNs (169/188, 89.9%/53.3%), respectively. Four ground glass nodules (GGNs) (4/6) were detected by T2-fBLADE TSE. Twelve part-solid nodules (PSNs) (12/22) were detected by T1-VIBE and 20 PSNs (20/22) by T2-SPACE. A total of 100 lesions (2.2±1.4 cm, 0.8-7.3 cm) were accurately detected and measured by the four MRI sequences with ICC >0.96. The picture-SNR, lesion-SNR and CNR by T1-starVIBE were higher than those by T1-VIBE (P<0.001). The lesion-SNR and CNR by T2-fBLADE TSE were higher than those by T2-SPACE (P=0.006, 0.038). 86% of images by T1-starVIBE, 92% by T2-fBLADE TSE, 90% by T2-SPACE and 93% by T1-VIBE were scored 3 or more.ConclusionsMRI achieves high sensitivity and specificity for different type of pulmonary nodules detection and is an effective alternative to CT as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary nodules.

Dataset Information

Intraindividual Comparison between Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dynamic Computed Tomography for Characterizing Focal Hepatic Lesions: A Multicenter, Multireader Study.

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Intraindividual Comparison between Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dynamic Computed Tomography for Characterizing Focal Hepatic Lesions: A Multicenter, Multireader Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets