Dataset Information

Effect of oral L-citrulline on brachial and aortic blood pressure defined by resting status: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT: Background:Experimental evidence indicates that oral L-citrulline (L-Cit) may reduce resting blood pressure (BP) as well as BP responses to exercise and cold exposure (non-resting). However, results from human intervention trials are inconsistent. This study aims to summarize the clinical evidence regarding the effects of L-Cit supplementation on brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP), brachial diastolic blood pressure (DBP), in addition to aortic SBP and aortic DBP at rest and non-resting conditions. Methods:Multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials were searched systematically. Randomized controlled trials of human participants were quantitatively meta-analyzed. Results:Fourteen trials contained in eight studies were available for quantitative syntheses for brachial BP. Results showed that L-Cit supplementation significantly reduced both brachial SBP (-?4.490?mmHg, 95% CI: -?7.332 to -?1.648, P?=?0.002) and brachial DBP (-?3.629?mmHg, 95% CI: -?5.825 to -?1.434, P?=?0.001). Nine of the trials were meta-analyzed for aortic BP which showed that L-Cit intervention significantly reduced aortic SBP (-?6.763?mmHg, 95% CI: -?10.991 to -?2.534, P?=?0.002), but not aortic DBP (-?3.396?mmHg, 95% CI: -?7.418 to 0.627, P?=?0.098). The observed reducing effects of L-Cit appeared stronger for non-resting than for resting brachial SBP (P for difference?=?0.044). Conclusion:L-Cit supplementation significantly decreased non-resting brachial and aortic SBP. Brachial DBP was significantly lowered by L-Cit regardless of resting status. Given the relatively small number of available trials in the stratified analyses and the potential limitations of these trials, the present findings should be interpreted cautiously and need to be confirmed in future well-designed trials with a larger sample size.

SUBMITTER: Yang HH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6933755 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of oral L-citrulline on brachial and aortic blood pressure defined by resting status: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Yang Huan-Huan HH Li Xin-Li XL Zhang Wei-Guo WG Figueroa Arturo A Chen Li-Hua LH Qin Li-Qiang LQ

Nutrition & metabolism 20191226

<h4>Background</h4>Experimental evidence indicates that oral L-citrulline (L-Cit) may reduce resting blood pressure (BP) as well as BP responses to exercise and cold exposure (non-resting). However, results from human intervention trials are inconsistent. This study aims to summarize the clinical evidence regarding the effects of L-Cit supplementation on brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP), brachial diastolic blood pressure (DBP), in addition to aortic SBP and aortic DBP at rest and non-resti ...[more]

PMID: 31889969

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:High brachial blood pressure (BP) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. However major differences in central systolic BP can occur among people with similar brachial systolic BP. It is known that central aortic pressure responses to antihypertensive therapy can differ substantially from brachial BP responses, such that true treatment effects cannot be gauged from conventional brachial BP. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to examine if adequate control of brachial BP was concordant with central BP control in treated hypertensive subjects. METHODS:Non-invasive acquisition of brachial and central pressures and wave forms was obtained from 100 subjects with systemic arterial hypertension on drug therapy and 50 healthy individuals. After all necessary precautions according to the guidelines, brachial and central pressures and wave forms were measured 3 times at 5 min intervals using an upper arm cuff (AGEDIO K900 HDP Stolberg, Germany). The mean of the last two measurements of each was recorded as representative of brachial and central aortic pressures and wave forms. RESULTS:In 45 of 50 healthy subjects with normotension (41 male, 9 female, mean age 38 years), central systolic BP was <120 mmHg. Five healthy subjects (10%) had falsely normal brachial systolic BP, but raised central systolic BP. Out of 100 patients with known hypertension and on various anti-hypertensive drug combinations, 9 had uncontrolled hypertension (defined as brachial BP of >140/90 mmHg and central systolic BP > 120 mmHg). Ninety-one patients had controlled hypertension as estimated by brachial BP of whom, 37 patients had uncontrolled central BP (systolic BP > 120 mmHg). Thus, brachial BP estimation over-estimated control of hypertension in 41% patients (p < 0.01). Central systolic BP control was inadequate in 9 out of 41 patients (22%) on angiotensin receptor blocking therapy versus 27 out of 31 (87%) patients on beta-blocking therapy (p < 0.05). Thus, there was a marked mismatch with regard to control of hypertension between central and peripheral measurements. CONCLUSION:Central BP measurement provides important information on true prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension in the outpatient setting which is higher than current estimates from brachial BP measurement. Optimal BP control by central BP is far less than observed from peripheral pressure measurement. Residual cardiovascular risk despite adequate control of brachial BP can also be explained by the substantial frequency of uncontrolled hypertension as determined by the central BP in patients with apparently controlled hypertension. Both these conclusions have significant impact on prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and its proper management. Further studies are required to confirm the current data and to provide evidence that treatment decisions based on measurements of central BP result in better outcomes.

Project description:Background Arterial hypertension affects cardiovascular outcome in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). We hypothesized that angioplasty of peripheral arterial stenoses decreases aortic (aBP) and brachial blood pressure (bBP). Methods and Results In an index cohort (n=30), we simultaneously measured aBP, bBP, augmentation index (AIx), and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) before and after angioplasty of the iliac and femoropopliteal arteries; diagnostic angiography served as a control. In an all-comer registry cohort (n=381), we prospectively measured bBP in patients scheduled for angioplasty of the iliac, femoral, and crural arteries or diagnostic angiography. Systolic aBP decreased after iliac (Δ-25 mmHg; 95% CI, -30 to -20; P<0.0001) and femoropopliteal angioplasty (Δ-12 mmHg; 95% CI, -17 to -5; P<0.0001) as compared with diagnostic angiography. Diastolic aBP decreased after iliac (Δ-9 mmHg; 95% CI, -13 to -1; P=0.01) but not femoropopliteal angioplasty. In parallel, AIx significantly dropped, whereas PWV remained stable. In the registry cohort, systolic bBP decreased after angioplasty of the iliac (Δ-17 mmHg; 95% CI, -31 to -8; P=0.0005) and femoropopliteal arteries (Δ-10 mmHg; 95% CI, -23 to -1; P=0.04) but not the crural arteries, as compared with diagnostic angiography. Diastolic bBP decreased after iliac (Δ-10 mmHg; 95% CI, -17 to -2; P=0.01) and femoropopliteal angioplasty (Δ-9 mmHg; 95% CI, -15 to -1; P=0.04). Multivariate analysis identified baseline systolic bBP and site of lesion as determinants of systolic bBP drop after endovascular treatment. Conclusions Angioplasty of flow-limiting stenoses in patients with peripheral artery disease lowers aortic and brachial blood pressure with more pronounced effects at more proximal lesion sites and elevated baseline systolic blood pressure. These data indicate a role of endovascular treatment to acutely optimize blood pressure in patients with peripheral artery disease. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02728479.

Dataset Information

Effect of oral L-citrulline on brachial and aortic blood pressure defined by resting status: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Publications

Effect of oral L-citrulline on brachial and aortic blood pressure defined by resting status: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets