Dataset Information

Behavioral Intervention and Disposal of Leftover Opioids: A Randomized Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Leftover prescription opioids pose risks to children and adolescents, yet many parents keep these medications in the home. Our objective in this study was to determine if providing a behavioral disposal method (ie, Nudge) with or without a Scenario-Tailored Opioid Messaging Program (STOMP) (risk-enhancement education) improves parents' opioid-disposal behavior after their children's use.

Methods

Parents whose children were prescribed a short course of opioids were recruited and randomly assigned to the Nudge or control groups with or without STOMP. Parents completed surveys at baseline and 7 and 14 days. Main outcomes were (1) prompt disposal (ie, immediate disposal of leftovers after use) and (2) planned retention (intention to keep leftovers).

Results

There were 517 parents who took part, and 93% had leftovers after use. Prompt disposal behavior was higher for parents who received both the STOMP and Nudge interventions (38.5%), Nudge alone (33.3%), or STOMP alone (31%) compared with controls (19.2%; P ? .02). Furthermore, the STOMP intervention independently decreased planned retention rates (5.6% vs 12.5% no STOMP; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.85]). Higher risk perception lowered the odds of planned retention (aOR 0.87 [95% CI 0.79-0.96]), whereas parental past opioid misuse increased those odds (aOR 4.44 [95% CI 1.67-11.79]).

Conclusions

Providing a disposal method nudged parents to dispose of their children's leftover opioids promptly after use, whereas STOMP boosted prompt disposal and reduced planned retention. Such strategies can reduce the presence of risky leftover medications in the home and decrease the risks posed to children and adolescents.

SUBMITTER: Voepel-Lewis T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6939843 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Behavioral Intervention and Disposal of Leftover Opioids: A Randomized Trial.

Voepel-Lewis Terri T Farley Frances A FA Grant John J Tait Alan R AR Boyd Carol J CJ McCabe Sean Esteban SE Weber Monica M Harbagh Calista M CM Zikmund-Fisher Brian J BJ

Pediatrics 20200101 1

<h4>Objectives</h4>Leftover prescription opioids pose risks to children and adolescents, yet many parents keep these medications in the home. Our objective in this study was to determine if providing a behavioral disposal method (ie, Nudge) with or without a Scenario-Tailored Opioid Messaging Program (STOMP) (risk-enhancement education) improves parents' opioid-disposal behavior after their children's use.<h4>Methods</h4>Parents whose children were prescribed a short course of opioids were recru ...[more]

PMID: 31871245

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAlthough opioids are an important component of pain management for children recovering from surgery, postoperative opioid prescribing has contributed to the current opioid crisis in the United States because these medications are often prescribed in excess and are rarely properly disposed. One potential strategy to combat opioid misuse is to remove excess postoperative opioids from circulation by providing patients with drug disposal products that enable safe disposal of opioids in the home garbage.ObjectiveTo determine whether the provision of a drug disposal bag increases proper opioid disposal among the families of pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery.Design, setting, and participantsThis randomized clinical trial enrolled 202 parents or guardians of children 1 to 17 years of age who underwent otolaryngologic or urologic surgery at the outpatient surgery centers of a tertiary children's hospital in Columbus, Ohio, from June to December 2018 and who received an opioid prescription prior to discharge.InterventionsFamilies randomized to intervention were provided a drug disposal bag containing activated charcoal and instructions for use plus standard postoperative discharge instructions on opioid use, storage, and disposal. Families in standard care arm received standard postoperative discharge instructions only. All participants completed a baseline survey and a follow-up survey 2 to 4 weeks postoperatively.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcome was proper opioid disposal, defined as disposal using a drug disposal bag or a disposal method recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration.ResultsOf 202 parents or guardians enrolled, 181 completed follow-up (92 in intervention arm and 89 in standard care arm). Most patients in both groups were white (75 [73.5%] vs 79 [80.6%]) and male (63 [61.2%] vs 54 [54.6%]), and the median (interquartile range) age was 6 (5-9) years in the intervention arm and 7 (6-10) years in the standard care arm. For intention-to-treat analyses, 92 families receiving a disposal bag and 89 families not receiving a disposal bag were included. Among them, 66 families (71.7%) randomized to receive a disposal bag reported properly disposing of their child's opioids, whereas 50 parents (56.2%) who did not receive a disposal bag reported proper opioid disposal (difference in proportions, 15.5%; 95% CI, 1.7%-29.3%; P = .03). Among only those families who filled an opioid prescription and had leftover opioids after resolution of their child's pain, 66 of 77 parents or guardians (85.7%) who had received a disposal bag and 50 of 77 parents or guardians (64.9%) who had received standard care reported properly disposing of their child's opioids (difference in proportions, 20.8%; 95% CI, 7.6%-34.0%).Conclusions and relevanceResults of this study indicated that providing drug disposal bags to families of children receiving postoperative opioids increased the likelihood of excess opioid disposal. Greater availability of disposal products may complement ongoing prescribing reduction efforts aimed at decreasing opioid misuse.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03575377.

Project description:BackgroundUS opioid prescribing and use escalated over the last two decades, with parallel increases in opioid misuse, opioid-related deaths, and concerns about diversion. Postoperatively prescribed opioids contribute to these problems. Policy makers have addressed this issue by limiting postoperative opioid prescribing. However, until recently, little data existed to guide prescribers on opioid needs postoperatively. This meta-analysis quantitatively integrated the growing literature regarding extent of opioids leftover after surgery and identified factors associated with leftover opioid proportions.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies quantifying postoperative opioid consumption in North American adults, and evaluated effect size moderators using robust variance estimation meta-regression. Medline, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant articles published January 1, 2000 to November 10, 2018. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool assessed risk of study bias. The proportion effect size quantified the primary outcome: proportion of prescribed postoperative opioids leftover at the time of follow-up. Primary meta-regression analyses tested surgical type, amount of opioids prescribed, and study publication year as possible moderators. Secondary meta-regression models included surgical invasiveness, age, race, gender, postoperative day of data collection, and preoperative opioid use.ResultsWe screened 911 citations and included 44 studies (13,068 patients). The mean weighted effect size for proportion of postoperative opioid prescriptions leftover was 61% (95% CI, 56-67%). Meta-regression models revealed type of surgical procedure and level of invasiveness had a statistically significant effect on proportion of opioids leftover. Proportion of opioids leftover was greater for "other soft tissue" surgeries than abdominal/pelvic surgeries, but did not differ significantly between orthopedic and abdominal/pelvic surgeries. Minimally invasive compared to open surgeries resulted in a greater proportion of opioids leftover. Limitations include predominance of studies from academic settings, inconsistent reporting of confounders, and a possible publication bias toward studies reporting smaller leftover opioid proportions.Conclusions and implications of key findingsA significant proportion of opioids are leftover postoperatively. Surgery type and level of invasiveness affect postoperative opioid consumption. Integration of such factors into prescribing guidelines may help minimize opioid overprescribing while adequately meeting analgesic needs.

Project description:Introduction: Opioid misuse and overprescription have contributed to a national public health crisis in the United States. Postoperatively, patients are often left with unused opioids, which pose a risk for diversion if not appropriately disposed of. Patients are infrequently provided instructions on safe disposal methods of surplus opioids. Purpose: We sought to determine the current rates of disposal of unused opioids and the reported disposal mechanisms for unused opioids that were prescribed for acute postoperative pain control. Methods: A systematic review was performed of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for relevant articles from their earliest entries through October 2, 2019. We used the search terms "opioid" or "narcotic" and "disposal" and "surgery." Studies were considered for inclusion if they reported the rate of disposal of unused opioids following surgery. A screening strategy was used to identify relevant articles using Covidence. For studies meeting inclusion criteria, relevant information was extracted. Results: Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria. We found that surplus opioid disposal rates varied widely, from 4.9% to 87.0%. Among studies with no intervention (opioid disposal education or drug disposal kit/bag), rates of opioid disposal ranged from 4.9% to 46.5%. While 7 studies used opioid disposal education as an intervention, only 3 showed a significant increase in surplus opioid disposal compared with standard care. All 3 studies that used an opioid disposal kit or bag as an intervention demonstrated significant increases in opioid disposal. Conclusions: Baseline rates of surplus opioid disposal are relatively low in the postoperative setting. Our findings suggest that opioid disposal kits significantly increase rates of surplus opioid disposal postoperatively. Further research, including a large-scale cost-benefit analysis, will be necessary prior to recommending widespread implementation of drug disposal kits or bags.

Project description:ObjectiveThe increased prevalence of leftover medicines in the community is currently a global concern due to the detrimental effects on the environment and health. However, several developing countries have failed to give sufficient consideration to the issue. The primary purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of leftover medicines, disposal practices, and the factors affecting those in households in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia.MethodsA community-based, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among households in Bere Edigetber and Nech Sar of Arba Minch town, from June 25 to August 27, 2022. Data were gathered through face-to-face interviews with revalidated structured questionnaires. A multistage sampling technique was utilized to select each household.ResultsThree hundred forty-eight households agreed to participate in a study, resulting in a 94.8% response rate. Of the study participant, 172 (49.4%) of the households had leftover medicines, with antibiotics being the most common (64% of 172). Subsidy of symptoms and saving for later use were two frequently cited reasons for the presence of leftover medicines in the house. Throwing leftover medicines in household garbage was the preferred method of disposal (>60%). Only 0.1% of respondents considered returning leftover medicines to healthcare facilities or professionals. A binary regression analysis identified four predictors for having leftover medicines. Medicines obtained without prescription were the strongest predictor (odds ratio = 3.7; p < 0.001), followed by higher family monthly income (odds ratio = 2.5; p = 0.005), those waived paying for medicine (odds ratio = 0.294; p = 0.049), and those used medications for acute diseases (p = 0.048; odds ratio = 0.450). Respondents who had prior information on safe medicine disposal were 2.3 (p = 0.04) more likely to dispose of possessed leftover medicines rather than keep them for future use.ConclusionsThis study revealed a high prevalence of leftover medicines and their improper disposal in Arba Minch town. The preferred methods of leftover medicine disposal in this study deviate from conventional standards. Significant factor variables that predict having leftover medicines are attributed to purchasing medicine without a prescription, higher family monthly income, those waived paying for medicine, and those who used medications for acute diseases. Prior knowledge of proper disposal practices predicated the decision to dispose of on-hand leftover medicines or keep them for future use. These findings would be critical in developing strategies to reduce leftover medicines and promote proper disposal practices.

Dataset Information

Behavioral Intervention and Disposal of Leftover Opioids: A Randomized Trial.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Behavioral Intervention and Disposal of Leftover Opioids: A Randomized Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets