Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.


ABSTRACT: Background Data are limited regarding long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock according to revascularization strategy. We sought to compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction multivessel disease with cardiogenic shock and patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and infarct-related artery (IRA)-only PCI. Methods and Results Of 13 104 patients from the nationwide, multicenter, prospective KAMIR-NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry--National Institutes of Health) registry, we selected 659 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who had concomitant non-IRA stenosis and presented with cardiogenic shock. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Multivessel PCI was performed in 260 patients and IRA-only PCI in 399 patients. At 3 years, patients in the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94 [P=0.024]), all-cause death or MI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84 [P=0.004]), and non-IRA repeat revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.50 [P<0.001]) than those in the IRA-only PCI group. The results were consistent after confounder adjustment by propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analysis. Landmark analysis at 1 year demonstrated that the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of recurrent MI and non-IRA repeat revascularization beyond 1 year (log-rank P=0.030 and P=0.017, respectively) than the IRA-only PCI group. Conclusions In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death than IRA-only PCI at 3 years, suggesting potential benefit of non-IRA revascularization during the index hospitalization to improve long-term clinical outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Lee JM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6951086 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.

Lee Joo Myung JM   Rhee Tae-Min TM   Kim Hyun Kuk HK   Hwang Doyeon D   Lee Seung Hun SH   Choi Ki Hong KH   Kim Jihoon J   Park Taek Kyu TK   Yang Jeong Hoon JH   Song Young Bin YB   Choi Jin-Ho JH   Choi Seung-Hyuk SH   Koo Bon-Kwon BK   Chae Shung Chull SC   Cho Myeong-Chan MC   Kim Chong Jin CJ   Kim Ju Han JH   Kim Hyo-Soo HS   Gwon Hyeon-Cheol HC   Jeong Myung Ho MH   Hahn Joo-Yong JY  

Journal of the American Heart Association 20191210 24


Background Data are limited regarding long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock according to revascularization strategy. We sought to compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction multivessel disease with cardiogenic shock and patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and infarct-related artery (IRA)-only PCI. Methods and Resul  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8120407 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8476228 | biostudies-literature
2024-03-26 | GSE254068 | GEO
| S-EPMC9524594 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3961318 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6749697 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4523695 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7453957 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5650570 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7792267 | biostudies-literature