Dataset Information

Trends in Self-reported Prediabetes and Metformin Use in the USA: NHANES 2005-2014.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that treatment with metformin be considered for prevention of type 2 diabetes in persons with prediabetes. However, metformin use outside the setting of diagnosed diabetes in US adults is not well characterized.

Objective

To examine trends in self-reported prediabetes and treatment with metformin. We also compared characteristics of adults self-reported prediabetes who were vs. were not taking metformin.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis.

Participants

Adults ? 20 years of age who participated in the 2005-2014 National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES), n = 28,461.

Approach

We characterized trends in self-reported prediabetes and metformin use in this population. We used multiple logistic regression models to identify predictors of metformin use among adults with self-reported prediabetes. All analyses accounted for the weighted complex survey design to generate nationally representative estimates.

Key results

The prevalence of self-reported prediabetes increased from 5.1% in 2005-2006 to 7.4% in 2013-2014 (P-for-trend < 0.001). In persons with self-reported prediabetes, metformin use increased, from 2.4 to 8.3% (P-for-trend = 0.013). Adults who were taking metformin were more likely to be obese and to report trying to lose weight in the past year.

Conclusions

Self-reported prediabetes has increased in the past decade. Metformin use in the setting of prediabetes has also increased but remains relatively uncommon at 8% in adults who self-report prediabetes, despite current clinical recommendations.

SUBMITTER: Liu C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6957593 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Trends in Self-reported Prediabetes and Metformin Use in the USA: NHANES 2005-2014.

Liu Caroline C Foti Kathryn K Grams Morgan E ME Shin Jung-Im JI Selvin Elizabeth E

Journal of general internal medicine 20191021 1

<h4>Background</h4>The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that treatment with metformin be considered for prevention of type 2 diabetes in persons with prediabetes. However, metformin use outside the setting of diagnosed diabetes in US adults is not well characterized.<h4>Objective</h4>To examine trends in self-reported prediabetes and treatment with metformin. We also compared characteristics of adults self-reported prediabetes who were vs. were not taking metformin.<h4>Design</h4>C ...[more]

PMID: 31637644

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIt remains unclear what people are attempting to communicate, in terms of objectively monitored behavior, when describing their physical activity and sedentary behavior through self-report. The purpose of this study was to examine various objectively monitored accelerometer variables (e.g., moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA], steps/day, sedentary time, etc.) across categories of self-reported MVPA (< 150 vs. ? 150 minutes/week), usual occupational/domestic activity (UODA; "mostly sitting" vs. "stand, walk, lift, or carry"), and leisure-time sedentary behavior (LTSB; ? 3 vs. < 3 hours/day) in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (? 20 years).MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of 3,725 participants from the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) who provided relevant questionnaire responses and???1 day of valid accelerometer data. Descriptive statistics were computed for various objectively monitored accelerometer variables across categories of self-reported MVPA, UODA, and LTSB. Pairwise comparisons were conducted to examine differences in objectively monitored behavior between categories of self-reported MVPA, UODA, and LTSB.ResultsOn average, adults reporting compliance with physical activity guidelines (? 150 minutes/week of MVPA) accumulated more objectively measured physical activity and similar amounts of sedentary time relative to those reporting not achieving guidelines. Adults reporting their daily UODA as "mostly sitting" or accruing???3 hours/day of LTSB accumulated less objectively monitored physical activity and more sedentary time than those who described their UODA as "stand, walk, lift, or carry" or accrued?<?3 hours/day of LTSB. The most active cross-classified category (7,935 steps/day; ? 150 minutes/week of self-reported MVPA, "stand, walk, lift, or carry" UODA, and?<?3 hours/day of LTSB) accumulated more than twice as many daily steps as the least active cross-classified category (3,532 steps/day; < 150 minutes/week of self-reported MVPA, "mostly sitting" UODA, and???3 hours/day of LTSB).ConclusionsA number of objectively monitored physical activity indicators varied significantly between self-reported MVPA, UODA, and LTSB categories, while objectively monitored sedentary time only varied between UODA and LTSB categories. Cross-classifications of self-reported MVPA, UODA, and LTSB responses depict a greater range of physical activity than viewing dichotomous responses for these variables one-at-a-time.

Project description:BackgroundPublished evidence suggests an inverse association between sleep duration and body weight status.ObjectiveWe examined the association of sleep duration with eating behaviors reported by adult Americans to understand the relation between sleep duration and body weight status.DesignThis cross-sectional study used sleep duration and dietary data from the continuous NHANES conducted from 2005 to 2010 (n = 15,199, age ≥20 y). Eating behaviors examined included the following: reporting of and energy from main meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) and snacks (before breakfast, after dinner, and after 2000 h), intermeal intervals, time of day of main meal reporting, and intakes of macronutrients and beverages. Multiple regression methods were used to examine the independent association of hours of sleep duration grouped as short (≤6 h), average (7-8 h), and long (≥9 h) with eating behavior outcomes.ResultsRelative to average-duration sleepers, a smaller percentage of short-duration sleepers mentioned breakfast, lunch (women only), and dinner in the recall (P ≤ 0.04). They also reported a lower mean percentage of energy from main meals but higher energy from all snacks (P ≤ 0.0004) and after 2000 h (P = 0.03). Short-duration sleepers reported the earliest eating time of the first episode and the latest time of the last eating episode. Absolute amounts of sugar and caffeine and percentage of energy from beverages (women only) were higher in short-duration sleepers. However, the total number of eating episodes and energy intake were not related with sleep duration.ConclusionsShort-duration sleepers began eating earlier and ended their eating later in the day, but despite the longer eating period, they did not report more eating events. Profiles of the relative contribution of main meals and snacks, at or after 2000 h eating, and beverages in short-duration sleepers were suggestive of eating behaviors that may increase energy intake, but 24-h energy intake did not differ among categories of sleep duration.

Dataset Information

Trends in Self-reported Prediabetes and Metformin Use in the USA: NHANES 2005-2014.

Background

Objective

Design

Participants

Approach

Key results

Conclusions

Publications

Trends in Self-reported Prediabetes and Metformin Use in the USA: NHANES 2005-2014.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets