Dataset Information

Guidelines for cell-type heterogeneity quantification based on a comparative analysis of reference-free DNA methylation deconvolution software.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cell-type heterogeneity of tumors is a key factor in tumor progression and response to chemotherapy. Tumor cell-type heterogeneity, defined as the proportion of the various cell-types in a tumor, can be inferred from DNA methylation of surgical specimens. However, confounding factors known to associate with methylation values, such as age and sex, complicate accurate inference of cell-type proportions. While reference-free algorithms have been developed to infer cell-type proportions from DNA methylation, a comparative evaluation of the performance of these methods is still lacking.

Results

Here we use simulations to evaluate several computational pipelines based on the software packages MeDeCom, EDec, and RefFreeEWAS. We identify that accounting for confounders, feature selection, and the choice of the number of estimated cell types are critical steps for inferring cell-type proportions. We find that removal of methylation probes which are correlated with confounder variables reduces the error of inference by 30-35%, and that selection of cell-type informative probes has similar effect. We show that Cattell's rule based on the scree plot is a powerful tool to determine the number of cell-types. Once the pre-processing steps are achieved, the three deconvolution methods provide comparable results. We observe that all the algorithms' performance improves when inter-sample variation of cell-type proportions is large or when the number of available samples is large. We find that under specific circumstances the methods are sensitive to the initialization method, suggesting that averaging different solutions or optimizing initialization is an avenue for future research.

Conclusion

Based on the lessons learned, to facilitate pipeline validation and catalyze further pipeline improvement by the community, we develop a benchmark pipeline for inference of cell-type proportions and implement it in the R package medepir.

SUBMITTER: Decamps C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6958785 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Guidelines for cell-type heterogeneity quantification based on a comparative analysis of reference-free DNA methylation deconvolution software.

Decamps Clémentine C Privé Florian F Bacher Raphael R Jost Daniel D Waguet Arthur A Houseman Eugene Andres EA Lurie Eugene E Lutsik Pavlo P Milosavljevic Aleksandar A Scherer Michael M Blum Michael G B MGB Richard Magali M

BMC bioinformatics 20200113 1

<h4>Background</h4>Cell-type heterogeneity of tumors is a key factor in tumor progression and response to chemotherapy. Tumor cell-type heterogeneity, defined as the proportion of the various cell-types in a tumor, can be inferred from DNA methylation of surgical specimens. However, confounding factors known to associate with methylation values, such as age and sex, complicate accurate inference of cell-type proportions. While reference-free algorithms have been developed to infer cell-type prop ...[more]

PMID: 31931698

Similar Datasets

Project description:Reference-based deconvolution methods use reference libraries of cell-specific DNA methylation (DNAm) measurements as a means toward deconvoluting cell proportions in heterogeneous biospecimens (e.g., whole-blood). As the accuracy of such methods depends highly on the CpG loci comprising the reference library, recent research efforts have focused on the selection of libraries to optimize deconvolution accuracy. While existing approaches for library selection work extremely well, the best performing approaches require a training data set consisting of both DNAm profiles over a heterogeneous cell population and gold-standard measurements of cell composition (e.g., flow cytometry) in the same samples. Here, we present a framework for reference library selection without a training dataset (RESET) and benchmark it against the Legacy method (minfi:pickCompProbes), where libraries are constructed based on a pre-specified number of cell-specific differentially methylated loci (DML). RESET uses a modified version of the Dispersion Separability Criteria (DSC) for comparing different libraries and has four main steps: (1) identify a candidate set of cell-specific DMLs, (2) randomly sample DMLs from the candidate set, (3) compute the Modified DSC of the selected DMLs, and (4) update the selection probabilities of DMLs based on their contribution to the Modified DSC. Steps 2-4 are repeated many times and the library with the largest Modified DSC is selected for subsequent reference-based deconvolution. We evaluated RESET using several publicly available datasets consisting of whole-blood DNAm measurements with corresponding measurements of cell composition. We computed the RMSE and R2 between the predicted cell proportions and their measured values. RESET outperformed the Legacy approach in selecting libraries that improve the accuracy of deconvolution estimates. Additionally, reference libraries constructed using RESET resulted in cellular composition estimates that explained more variation in DNAm as compared to the Legacy approach when evaluated in the context of epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) of several publicly available data sets. This finding has implications for the statistical power of EWAS. RESET combats potential challenges associated with existing approaches for reference library assembly and thus, may serve as a viable strategy for library construction in the absence of a training data set.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is commonly used in epigenome-wide association studies of prenatal exposures. Accounting for cell type composition is critical in such studies as it reduces confounding due to the cell specificity of DNA methylation (DNAm). In the absence of cell sorting information, statistical methods can be applied to deconvolve heterogeneous cell mixtures. Among these methods, reference-based approaches leverage age-appropriate cell-specific DNAm profiles to estimate cellular composition. In UCB, four reference datasets comprising DNAm signatures profiled in purified cell populations have been published using the Illumina 450?K and EPIC arrays. These datasets are biologically and technically different, and currently, there is no consensus on how to best apply them. Here, we systematically evaluate and compare these datasets and provide recommendations for reference-based UCB deconvolution. RESULTS:We first evaluated the four reference datasets to ascertain both the purity of the samples and the potential cell cross-contamination. We filtered samples and combined datasets to obtain a joint UCB reference. We selected deconvolution libraries using two different approaches: automatic selection using the top differentially methylated probes from the function pickCompProbes in minfi and a standardized library selected using the IDOL (Identifying Optimal Libraries) iterative algorithm. We compared the performance of each reference separately and in combination, using the two approaches for reference library selection, and validated the results in an independent cohort (Generation R Study, n = 191) with matched Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting measured cell counts. Strict filtering and combination of the references significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of cell type estimates. Ultimately, the IDOL library outperformed the library from the automatic selection method implemented in pickCompProbes. CONCLUSION:These results have important implications for epigenetic studies in UCB as implementing this method will optimally reduce confounding due to cellular heterogeneity. This work provides guidelines for future reference-based UCB deconvolution and establishes a framework for combining reference datasets in other tissues.

Dataset Information

Guidelines for cell-type heterogeneity quantification based on a comparative analysis of reference-free DNA methylation deconvolution software.

Background

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Guidelines for cell-type heterogeneity quantification based on a comparative analysis of reference-free DNA methylation deconvolution software.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets