Dataset Information

Risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:To clarify the risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage (TMC) following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to reduce subsidence. METHODS:The present retrospective cohort study included 73 consecutive patients who underwent single-level ACCF. Patients were divided into subsidence (n?=?31) and non-subsidence groups (n?=?42). Medical records and radiological parameters such as age, sex, operation level, segmental angle (SA), cervical sagittal angle (CSA), height of anterior (HAE) and posterior endplate (HPE), ratio of anterior (RAE) and posterior endplate (RPE), the alignment of TMC, the global cervical Hounsfield Units (HU) were analyzed. Clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS:Subsidence occurred in 31 of 73 (42.5%) patients. Comparison between the groups showed significant differences in the value of RAE, the alignment of TMC and the global cervical HU value (p??1.18 (OR?=?6.116, 95%CI?=?1.613-23.192, p?=?0.008), alignment of TMC?>?3° (OR?=?5.355, 95%CI?=?1.474-19.454, p?=?0.011) and the global cervical HU value

SUBMITTER: Ji C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6961320 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Ji Chengyue C Yu Shunzhi S Yan Ning N Wang Jiaxing J Hou Fang F Hou Tiesheng T Cai Weihua W

BMC musculoskeletal disorders 20200114 1

<h4>Background</h4>To clarify the risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage (TMC) following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to reduce subsidence.<h4>Methods</h4>The present retrospective cohort study included 73 consecutive patients who underwent single-level ACCF. Patients were divided into subsidence (n = 31) and non-subsidence groups (n = 42). Medical records and radiological parameters such as age, sex, operation level, segmental angle (SA), cervical sagit ...[more]

PMID: 31937288

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivePrevious studies have found satisfactory clinical results with the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage to reconstruct the stability of anterior cervical column. However, studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of the n-HA/PA66 cage in multi-level degenerative cervical myelopathy (MDCM) have not been reported. This study aims to compare the outcomes of corpectomy anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) hybrid procedures between the n-HA/PA66 cage and titanium mesh cage (TMC) to treat MDCM.MethodsAfter the screening for eligibility, this retrospective study involved 90 patients who underwent corpectomy ACDF hybrid (CACDFH) procedure from June 2013 to June 2018. The CACDFH procedure is the combination of ACDF and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). According to the cage utilized, we categorized patients into a n-HA/PA66 cage group and a TMC group. Then, stepwise propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to maintain comparable clinical data between groups. All the patients were followed up ≥4 years and the longest follow-up time was 65.43 (±11.49) months. Cage subsidence, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), segmental height (SH), segmental angle (SA), cervical lordosis (CL), and clinical data (visual analogue scale [VAS] and Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score) was evaluated preoperatively, at 1 week, and at the final surgery follow-up. The independent student's t test and chi-square test were applied to compare the differences between groups.ResultsThrough PSM analysis, 25 patients from the n-HA/PA66 group were matched to 25 patients in the TMC group. The occurrence of ASD was 16.0% (4/25) in the n-HA/PA 66 group, which was significantly less than in the TMC group at 44.0% (11/25) (p = 0.031). Moreover, the cage subsidence rate was significantly higher in the TMC group as compared to the n-HA/PA 66 group (40.0% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.024). But there was no significant difference in SH, SA, and CL at any time after surgery as determined through follow-up. The VAS and JOA scores significantly improved in both groups at 3 months postoperative and at final follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in the VAS and JOA score at any time between the two groups in preoperative (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe n-HA/PA66 cage is associated with lower rate of cage subsidence and ASD than the TMC in the treatment of MDCM. The n-HA/PA66 cage could be superior to the TMC in corpectomy ACDF hybrid procedures.

Project description:Favorable bone fusion and clinical results have been reported for anterior cervical fusion (ACF) using titanium interbody cage (TIC). This method might induce postoperative subsidence and local kyphosis, but the relationship between radiological changes and preoperative local alignment is not known. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the impact of preoperative local alignment on the clinical and radiological outcomes of ACF using TIC.The study enrolled 36 patients (mean age 49.8 years) who underwent single-level ACF using TIC for cervical degenerative diseases. Patients were divided into 2 groups by preoperative segmental lordotic angle at the operative level: group L, ≥0° (n = 16); group K, <0° (n = 20). Clinical outcomes included recovery rate according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and complication rates. Radiological assessment was conducted for the cervical and segmental lordotic angles, subsidence, and bone fusion. Mann-Whitney test and chi-square test were applied to compare the outcomes.The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score recovery rate was 77.2% in group L and 87.6% in group K, with no significant difference. No obvious complications were observed in any of the subjects. Mean cervical lordotic angles preoperatively and at last follow-up were 9.2 ± 9.5° and 11.3 ± 11.7°, respectively, in group L, and -1.3 ± 12.8° and 4.6 ± 13.3°, respectively, in group K. The mean segmental lordotic angles preoperatively and at last follow-up were 2.5 ± 2.2° and 2.6 ± 5.7°, respectively, in group L, and -4.5 ± 2.8° and -1.4 ± 5.8°, respectively, in group K. In group K, the cervical and segmental lordotic angles at the last follow-up were significantly greater than the preoperative angles. The change observed in group L was not significant. Subsidence of ≥3 mm was observed in 3 patients in group L and 4 patients in group K. None of the patients showed nonunion.Anterior cervical fusion using TIC provided favorable clinical results regardless of preoperative segmental alignment. Although postoperative subsidence and kyphotic changes are concerns in patients presenting segmental kyphosis, ACF using TIC corrected both the entire cervical spine and segmental alignment. The TIC is useful for correction of the cervical alignment for patients with cervical degenerative disease with local kyphotic changes.

Project description:BackgroundIn case of spinal cord compression behind the vertebral body, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) proves to be a more feasible approach than cervical discectomy. The next step was the placement of an expandable titanium interbody in order to restore the vertebral height. The need for additional anterior plating with ACCF has been debatable and such technique has been evaluated by very few studies. The objective of the study is to evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease treated by stand-alone cages for anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).MethodsThirty-one patients (66.5 ± 9.75 years, range 53-85 years) were analyzed. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the 10-item Neck Disability Index (NDI) were assessed preoperatively and during follow-up on a regular basis after surgery and after one year at least. Assessment of radiographic fusion, subsidence, and lordosis measurement of Global cervical lordosis (GCL); fusion site lordosis (FSL); the anterior interbody space height (ant. DSH); the posterior interbody space height (post. DSH); the distance of the cage to the posterior wall of the vertebral body (CD) were done retrospectively. Mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 20.0 ± 4.39 months.ResultsVAS-neck (p = 0.001) and VAS-arm (p < 0.001) improved from preoperatively to postoperatively. The NDI improved at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Neither significant subsidence of the cages nor significant loss of lordotic correction were seen. All patients showed a radiographic union of the surgically addressed segments at the last follow up.ConclusionsApplication of a stand-alone expandable cage in the cervical spine after one or two-level ACCF without additional posterior fixation or anterior plating is a safe procedure that results in fusion. Neither significant subsidence of the cages nor significant loss of lordotic correction were seen.Trial registrationRetrospectively registered. According to the Decision of the ethics committee, Jena on 25th of July 2018, that this study doesn't need any registration. https://www.laek-thueringen.de/aerzte/ethikkommission/registrierung/ .

Project description:BackgroundEndplate morphology is considered to be one of the influencing factors of cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Previous radiographic evaluations on the endplate mostly used sagittal X-ray or MRI. However, there are few studies on the CT evaluation of the endplate and intervertebral space (IVS), especially the evaluation of coronal morphology and its influence on subsidence and fusion after LIF. We aimed to measure and classify the shapes of the endplate and IVS using coronal CT imaging and evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of different shapes of the endplate/IVS following oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF).MethodsA total of 137 patients (average age 59.1 years, including 75 males and 62 females) who underwent L4-5 OLIF combined with anterolateral fixation from June 2018 to June 2020 were included. The endplate concavity depth (ECD) was measured on the preoperative coronal CT image. According to ECD, the endplate was classified as flat (< 2 mm), shallow (2-4 mm), or deep (> 4 mm). The L4-5 IVS was further classified according to endplate type. The disc height (DH), DH changes, subsidence rate, fusion rate, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in different endplate/IVS shapes were evaluated during 1-year follow up.ResultsThe ECD of L4 inferior endplate (IEP) was significantly deeper than that of L5 superior endplate (SEP) (4.2 ± 1.1 vs 1.6 ± 0.8, P < 0.01). Four types of L4-5 IVS were identified: shallow-shallow (16, 11.7%), shallow-flat (45, 32.9%), deep-shallow (32, 23.4%), and deep-flat (44, 32.1%). A total of 45 (32.9%) cases of cage subsidence were observed. Only one (6.3%) subsidence event occurred in the shallow-shallow group, which was significantly lower than in the other three groups (19 shallow-flat, 6 deep-shallow, and 19 deep-flat) (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the shallow-shallow group had the highest fusion rate (15, 93.8%) and the highest rate of reach minimal clinically important difference (MCID) ODI among the four types. For a single endplate, the shape of L4 IEP is the main influencing factor of the final interbody fusion rate, and the shallow shape L4 IEP facilitates fusion ( OR = 2.85, p = 0.03). On the other hand, the flat shape L5 SEP was the main risk factor to cage subsidence (OR = 4.36, p < 0.01).ConclusionThe L4-5 IVS is asymmetrical on coronal CT view and tends to be fornix-above and flat-down. The shallow-shallow IVS has the lowest subsidence rate and best fusion result, which is possibly because it has a relatively good degree in matching either the upper or lower interface of the cage and endplates. These findings provide a basis for the further improvements in the design of OLIF cages.

Project description:BackgroundThis was a prospective randomized cohort study aiming at examining the safety and efficacy of artificial vertebral body (AVB) fabricated by electron beam melting (EBM) in comparison to conventional titanium mesh cage (TMC) used in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (SL-ACCF).MethodsForty patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent SL-ACCF using either the EBM-AVB or the TMC. Patients were evaluated for their demographics, radiological characteristics, neurologic function [using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale], and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) aspects [using the Short Form 36 (SF-36)] before and after the surgery and comparison was made between the two groups both at baseline and the last follow-up. The Student t-text, paired-sample t-text, and Fisher's exact test were used when appropriate to detect any statistical significance at the level of α=0.05.ResultsPost-operative recovery was uneventful for all patients and no revision surgery was required. There were no significant differences between the EBM-AVB group and the TMC group at baseline. Patients in both groups demonstrated significant improvement in cervical alignment, JOA score, and SF-36 score after the surgery. Six months post-operatively, patients in the EBM-AVB group were found to have significantly less loss of fusion height and lower incidence for severe implant subsidence compared with the TMC group. Patients in the two groups were comparable at the last follow-up regarding their rate of fusion, cervical alignment, JOA recovery rate, SF-36 score, and by Odom's criteria.ConclusionsFor CSM patients undergoing SL-ACCF, the EBM-AVB group demonstrated comparable outcomes regarding patient cervical alignment, neurologic function, and HRQoL in comparison with the TMC group. Furthermore, the use of EBM-AVB was associated with decreased loss of the height of the fusion mass and a lower rate for severe implant subsidence.

Dataset Information

Risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Publications

Risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets