Dataset Information

Status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in keloid.

ABSTRACT: Macrophages, differentiation from monocytes infiltrated in the wound, have been suggested to be involved and to play an important role in the pathogenesis of wound healing. Nevertheless, no evidence has been established regarding M1 and M2 type macrophages in Keloid. To understand the status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in keloid, immunohistochemistry was performed on 30 cases of Keloid tissues and normal controls, with CD68, typical surface marker for M1 and CD163, well-accepted marker for M2 being immunostained. Meanwhile, the glucocorticoid receptor NR3C1 was also detected. As further confirmation, quantitative real-time PCR was utilized to verify the expression of CD68, CD163 and NR3C1 on mRNA level. It was consistently shown that infiltrated M2 macrophages pronouncedly outnumbered M1 macrophages in the dermis of keloids; and that NR3C1 expression was significantly up-regulated in keloids than that in normal controls. In addition, there was a marked correlation between CD163 and NR3C1 expression. Our results suggest that the number of infiltrated M2 macrophages in the dermis of keloids may be linked to the responsiveness to glucocorticoids in the pathogenesis of keloid.

SUBMITTER: Li X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6965870 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in keloid.

Li Xuechuan X Wang Yu Y Yuan Bo B Yang Huizhong H Qiao Liang L

International journal of clinical and experimental pathology 20171101 11

Macrophages, differentiation from monocytes infiltrated in the wound, have been suggested to be involved and to play an important role in the pathogenesis of wound healing. Nevertheless, no evidence has been established regarding M1 and M2 type macrophages in Keloid. To understand the status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in keloid, immunohistochemistry was performed on 30 cases of Keloid tissues and normal controls, with CD68, typical surface marker for M1 and CD163, well-accepted marker for M2 ...[more]

PMID: 31966458

Similar Datasets

Project description:Macrophage polarization is increasingly recognised as an important pathogenetic factor in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Proinflammatory M1 macrophages promote T helper (Th) 1 responses and show tumoricidal activity. M2 macrophages contribute to tissue repair and promote Th2 responses. CD68 and CD163 are used to identify macrophages in tissue sections. However, characterisation of polarised macrophages in situ has remained difficult. Macrophage polarisation is regulated by transcription factors, pSTAT1 and RBP-J for M1, and CMAF for M2. We reasoned that double-labelling immunohistochemistry for the detection of macrophage markers together with transcription factors may be suitable to characterise macrophage polarisation in situ. To test this hypothesis, we have studied conditions associated with Th1- and Th2-predominant immune responses: infectious mononucleosis and Crohn's disease for Th1 and allergic nasal polyps, oxyuriasis, wound healing and foreign body granulomas for predominant Th2 response. In all situations, CD163+ cells usually outnumbered CD68+ cells. Moreover, CD163+ cells, usually considered as M2 macrophages, co-expressing pSTAT1 and RBP-J were found in all conditions examined. The numbers of putative M1 macrophages were higher in Th1- than in Th2-associated diseases, while more M2 macrophages were seen in Th2- than in Th1 related disorders. In most Th1-related diseases, the balance of M1 over M2 cells was shifted towards M1 cells, while the reverse was observed for Th2-related conditions. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed two distinct clusters: cluster I included Th1 diseases together with cases with high numbers of CD163+pSTAT1+, CD68+pSTAT1+, CD163+RBP-J+ and CD68+RBP-J+ macrophages; cluster II comprised Th2 conditions together with cases displaying high numbers of CD163+CMAF+ and CD68+CMAF+ macrophages. These results suggest that the detection of pSTAT1, RBP-J, and CMAF in the context of CD68 or CD163 expression is a suitable tool for the characterisation of macrophage polarisation in situ. Furthermore, CD163 cannot be considered a reliable M2 marker when used on its own.

Project description:BackgroundToll-like receptors (TLRs) and macrophages play an important role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Currently, it is not clear whether inflammatory M1 or anti-inflammatory M2 predominate among the resident macrophages in the synovium. In the present study, we set out to investigate the impact of TLR stimulation on monocyte-derived M1 and M2 macrophage function and phenotype by mimicking the exposure to abundant TLR agonists as occurs in the context of RA. The response of macrophage subsets to TLR2 and TLR4 activation was evaluated on cluster of differentiation (CD) marker profile; cytokine secretion; gene expression; and NF-?B, interferon regulatory factors 3 and 7 (IRF3/7), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation.MethodsHuman monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy individuals and patients with RA and differentiated into M1-like and M2-like macrophages by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), respectively. Cells were either (1) stimulated with TLR ligands Pam3 or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or (2) classically activated via interferon (IFN)-?/LPS. Cytokine production was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and gene expression was measured by qPCR. Cells were stained for CD markers and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. NF-?B, IRF3/7, and MAPKs were detected by Western blotting.ResultsMonocyte-derived macrophages of healthy donors (HD) or patients with RA displayed comparable subset-specific phenotypes upon exposure to TLR agonists. CD14 and CD163 marker expression on M2 macrophages did not change upon TLR2 and TLR4 engagement. By contrast, M2 gene markers HMOX1, FOLR2, and SLC40A1 were decreased. Importantly, M2 macrophages derived from HD or patients with RA showed both a decreased ratio of interleukin (IL)-10/IL-6 and IL-10/IL-8 upon stimulation with TLR2 ligand Pam3 compared with TLR4 ligand LPS. Gene expression of TLR2 was increased, whereas TLR4 expression was decreased, by TLR ligand stimulation. MAPKs p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase were activated more strongly in M2 than in M1 macrophages by Pam3 or LPS.ConclusionsWe show that the anti-inflammatory activity of M2 macrophages is reduced in the presence of abundant TLR2 ligands without significant changes in cell surface markers. Thus, the classical M1/M2 paradigm based on cellular markers does not apply to macrophage functions in inflammatory conditions such as RA.

Dataset Information

Status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in keloid.

Publications

Status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in keloid.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets