Dataset Information

Meta-analysis and GRADE profiles of exercise interventions for falls prevention in long-term care facilities.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

To provide a comprehensive collection of evidence on the effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent falls and support clinical decision-making.

Design

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails were performed by combining trials from published systematic reviews and more recent ones from a separate literature search.

Data sources

The literature search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Databases, and Google Scholar dating January 2007 - March 2018.

Review methods

Comparable studies were pooled using the random-effects model. The GRADE approach was used to judge the evidence.

Results

Exercises with a balance component or with technical devices reduced falls significantly, however, with low confidence in the evidence. The evidence indicated that exercises conducted longer than 6 months were beneficial. In frail residents, exercise interventions seemed to have substantially negative effects on falls.

Conclusions

Exercise interventions with technical devices, those with a balance component, and those performed longer than 6 months are recommended in long-term care settings. Frail residents need special attention when performing exercises due to their increased risk of falling.

Impact

Exercises with a balance component and exercises carried out with technical devices have beneficial effects, whereas exercises performed longer than 6 months are more effective than short-term performances. No significant reduction or decrease in the number of falls was found for exercise in cognitively impaired residents. In frail residents, however, the number of fall events increased substantially as a result of exercise interventions. The results of this review are useful for clinical decision-makers in long-term care facilities with regard to the planning and performance of exercise interventions for residents.

SUBMITTER: Schoberer D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6972676 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Meta-analysis and GRADE profiles of exercise interventions for falls prevention in long-term care facilities.

Schoberer Daniela D Breimaier Helga E HE

Journal of advanced nursing 20191108 1

<h4>Aims</h4>To provide a comprehensive collection of evidence on the effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent falls and support clinical decision-making.<h4>Design</h4>A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails were performed by combining trials from published systematic reviews and more recent ones from a separate literature search.<h4>Data sources</h4>The literature search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Databases, and Google Schola ...[more]

PMID: 31642090

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOveruse of antibiotics has contributed to antimicrobial resistance; a growing public health threat. In long-term care facilities, levels of inappropriate prescribing are as high as 75%. Numerous interventions targeting long-term care facilities' antimicrobial stewardship have been reported with varying, and largely unexplained, effects. Therefore, this review aimed to apply behavioural science frameworks to specify the component behaviour change techniques of stewardship interventions in long-term care facilities and identify those components associated with improved outcomes.MethodA systematic review (CRD42018103803) was conducted through electronic database searches. Two behavioural science frameworks, the Behaviour Change Wheel and Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy were used to classify intervention descriptions into intervention types and component behaviour change techniques used. Study design and outcome heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis and meta-regression. Interventions were categorised as 'very promising' (all outcomes statistically significant), 'quite promising' (some outcomes statistically significant), or 'not promising' (no outcomes statistically significant). 'Promise ratios' (PR) were calculated for identified intervention types and behaviour change techniques by dividing the number of (very or quite) promising interventions featuring the intervention type or behaviour change technique by the number of interventions featuring the intervention type or behaviour change technique that were not promising. Promising intervention types and behaviour change techniques were defined as those with a PR ≥ 2.ResultsTwenty studies (of19 interventions) were included. Seven interventions (37%) were 'very promising', eight 'quite promising' (42%) and four 'not promising' (21%). Most promising intervention types were 'persuasion' (n = 12; promise ratio (PR) = 5.0), 'enablement' (n = 16; PR = 4.33) and 'education' (n = 19; PR = 3.75). Most promising behaviour change techniques were 'feedback on behaviour' (n = 9; PR = 8.0) and 'restructuring the social environment' (e.g. staff role changes; n = 8; PR = 7.0).ConclusionSystematic identification of the active ingredients of antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care facilities was facilitated through the application of behavioural science frameworks. Incorporating environmental restructuring and performance feedback may be promising intervention strategies for antimicrobial stewardship interventions within long-term care facilities.

Project description:Background Guidance aiming at limiting the entry and spread of the COVID-19 have been widely communicated to Long-term Care Facilities (LTCFs). However, no clinical research has investigated their relevance. Objective Our objective was to compare the guidance applied for the prevention of the COVID-19 epidemic between the LTCFs having been contaminated by COVID-19 and LTCFs having not been contaminated. Methods A questionnaire was sent and systematically accompanied by phone call to the 132 LTCFs of Haute-Garonne (Occitania region, South-West of France). The questionnaire focused on the preventive measures implemented before March 23, 2020 (first LTCFs contaminated in this area). The questionnaire focused on physician support, implementation of usual guidance (eg, masks, hydro-alcoholic solute used), training on hygiene, containment in residents’ rooms and other distancing measures, use of temporary workers, compartmentalization within zones of residents and staff and a self-assessment analogic scale on the quality of the application of the preventive measures. We compared implementation of the guidance between the LTCFs with at least one case of COVID-19 among residents and/or health care professionals and LTCFs without COVID-19 case (between March 23rd and May 6th). Results 124 LTCFs participated (93.9%). 30 LTCFs (24.19%) were contaminated with COVID-19. Large heterogeneity of the application of the guidance was observed. Public LTCFs (OR= 0.39 (0.20–0.73), LTCFs which organized staff compartmentalization within zones (OR= 0.19 (0.07–0.48)), and LTCF with a staff who self-assessed a higher quality implementation of the preventive measures (OR= 0.65 (0.43–0.98)) were significantly more likely to avoid contamination by the COVID-19 outbreak. Conclusion Our study supports the relevance of guidance to prevent the entry of COVID-19, in particular the staff compartmentalization within zones, as well as the perception of the staff regarding the quality of implementation of those measures in LTCFs. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article at 10.1007/s12603-020-1440-2 and is accessible for authorized users.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The number of older people dying in long-term care facilities is increasing; however, care at the end of life can be suboptimal. Interventions to improve palliative care delivery within these settings have been shown to be effective in improving care, but little is known about their implementation. AIM:The aim of this study was to describe the nature of implementation strategies and to identify facilitators and/or barriers to implementing palliative care interventions in long-term care facilities. DESIGN:Scoping review with a thematic synthesis, following the ENTREQ guidelines. DATA SOURCES:Published literature was identified from electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Controlled, non-controlled and qualitative studies and evaluations of interventions to improve palliative care in long-term care facilities were included. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were sourced and data extracted on the study characteristics, the implementation of the intervention, and facilitators and/or barriers to implementation. RESULTS:The review identified 8902 abstracts, from which 61 studies were included in the review. A matrix of implementation was developed with four implementation strategies (facilitation, education/training, internal engagement and external engagement) and three implementation stages (conditions to introduce the intervention, embedding the intervention within day-to-day practice and sustaining ongoing change). CONCLUSION:Incorporating an implementation strategy into the development and delivery of an intervention is integral in embedding change in practice. The review has shown that the four implementation strategies identified varied considerably across interventions; however, similar facilitators and barriers were encountered across the studies identified. Further research is needed to understand the extent to which different implementation strategies can facilitate the uptake of palliative care interventions in long-term care facilities.

Project description:ObjectivesThere are high levels of inappropriate antibiotic use in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Our objective was to examine evidence of the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce antibiotic use and/or inappropriate use in LTCFs.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL from 1997 until November 2018.Eligibility criteriaControlled and uncontrolled studies in LTCFs measuring intervention effects on rates of overall antibiotic use and/or appropriateness of use were included. Secondary outcomes were intervention implementation barriers from process evaluations.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers independently applied the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group's resources to classify interventions and assess risk of bias. Meta-analyses used random effects models to pool results.ResultsOf include studies (n=19), 10 had a control group and 17 had a high risk of bias. All interventions had multiple components. Eight studies (with high risk of bias) showed positive impacts on outcomes and included one of the following interventions: audit and feedback, introduction of care pathways or an infectious disease team. Meta-analyses on change in the percentage of residents on antibiotics (pooled relative risk (RR) (three studies, 6862 residents): 0.85, 95%?CI: 0.61 to 1.18), appropriateness of decision to treat with antibiotics (pooled RR (three studies, 993 antibiotic orders): 1.10, 95%?CI: 0.64 to 1.91) and appropriateness of antibiotic selection for respiratory tract infections (pooled RR (three studies, 292 orders): 1.15, 95%?CI: 0.95 to 1.40), showed no significant intervention effects. However, meta-analyses only included results from intervention groups since most studies lacked a control group. Insufficient data prevented meta-analysis on other outcomes. Process evaluations (n=7) noted poor intervention adoption, low physician engagement and high staff turnover as barriers.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence that interventions employed to date are effective at improving antibiotic use in LTCFs. Future studies should use rigorous study designs and tailor intervention implementation to the setting.

Dataset Information

Meta-analysis and GRADE profiles of exercise interventions for falls prevention in long-term care facilities.

Aims

Design

Data sources

Review methods

Results

Conclusions

Impact

Publications

Meta-analysis and GRADE profiles of exercise interventions for falls prevention in long-term care facilities.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets