Dataset Information

Likelihood contrasts: a machine learning algorithm for binary classification of longitudinal data.

ABSTRACT: Machine learning methods have gained increased popularity in biomedical research during the recent years. However, very few of them support the analysis of longitudinal data, where several samples are collected from an individual over time. Additionally, most of the available longitudinal machine learning methods assume that the measurements are aligned in time, which is often not the case in real data. Here, we introduce a robust longitudinal machine learning method, named likelihood contrasts (LC), which supports study designs with unaligned time points. Our LC method is a binary classifier, which uses linear mixed models for modelling and log-likelihood for decision making. To demonstrate the benefits of our approach, we compared it with existing methods in four simulated and three real data sets. In each simulated data set, LC was the most accurate method, while the real data sets further supported the robust performance of the method. LC is also computationally efficient and easy to use.

SUBMITTER: Klen R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6978422 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Likelihood contrasts: a machine learning algorithm for binary classification of longitudinal data.

Klén Riku R Karhunen Markku M Elo Laura L LL

Scientific reports 20200123 1

Machine learning methods have gained increased popularity in biomedical research during the recent years. However, very few of them support the analysis of longitudinal data, where several samples are collected from an individual over time. Additionally, most of the available longitudinal machine learning methods assume that the measurements are aligned in time, which is often not the case in real data. Here, we introduce a robust longitudinal machine learning method, named likelihood contrasts ...[more]

PMID: 31974488

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDeveloping binary classification rules based on SNP observations has been a major challenge for many modern bioinformatics applications, e.g., predicting risk of future disease events in complex conditions such as cancer. Small-sample, high-dimensional nature of SNP data, weak effect of each SNP on the outcome, and highly non-linear SNP interactions are several key factors complicating the analysis. Additionally, SNPs take a finite number of values which may be best understood as ordinal or categorical variables, but are treated as continuous ones by many algorithms.MethodsWe use the theory of high dimensional model representation (HDMR) to build appropriate low dimensional glass-box models, allowing us to account for the effects of feature interactions. We compute the second order HDMR expansion of the log-likelihood ratio to account for the effects of single SNPs and their pairwise interactions. We propose a regression based approach, called linear approximation for block second order HDMR expansion of categorical observations (LABS-HDMR-CO), to approximate the HDMR coefficients. We show how HDMR can be used to detect pairwise SNP interactions, and propose the fixed pattern test (FPT) to identify statistically significant pairwise interactions.ResultsWe apply LABS-HDMR-CO and FPT to synthetically generated HAPGEN2 data as well as to two GWAS cancer datasets. In these examples LABS-HDMR-CO enjoys superior accuracy compared with several algorithms used for SNP classification, while also taking pairwise interactions into account. FPT declares very few significant interactions in the small sample GWAS datasets when bounding false discovery rate (FDR) by 5%, due to the large number of tests performed. On the other hand, LABS-HDMR-CO utilizes a large number of SNP pairs to improve its prediction accuracy. In the larger HAPGEN2 dataset FTP declares a larger portion of SNP pairs used by LABS-HDMR-CO as significant.ConclusionLABS-HDMR-CO and FPT are interesting methods to design prediction rules and detect pairwise feature interactions for SNP data. Reliably detecting pairwise SNP interactions and taking advantage of potential interactions to improve prediction accuracy are two different objectives addressed by these methods. While the large number of potential SNP interactions may result in low power of detection, potentially interacting SNP pairs, of which many might be false alarms, can still be used to improve prediction accuracy.

Project description:BackgroundPrognosis, recurrence rate, and secondary prevention strategies differ by different etiologies in acute ischemic stroke. However, identifying its cause is challenging.ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a model to identify the cause of stroke using machine learning (ML) methods and test its accuracy.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who had determined etiology defined by the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) from CASE-II (NCT04487340) to train and evaluate six ML models, namely, Random Forests (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Ada Boosting, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), for the detection of cardioembolism (CE), large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and small-artery occlusion (SAO). Between October 2016 and April 2020, patients were enrolled consecutively for algorithm development (phase one). Between June 2020 and December 2020, patients were enrolled consecutively in a test set for algorithm test (phase two). Area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, accuracy, and F1 score were calculated for the prediction model.ResultsFinally, a total of 18,209 patients were enrolled in phase one, including 13,590 patients (i.e., 6,089 CE, 4,539 LAA, and 2,962 SAO) in the model, and a total of 3,688 patients were enrolled in phase two, including 3,070 patients (i.e., 1,103 CE, 1,269 LAA, and 698 SAO) in the model. Among the six models, the best models were RF, XGBoost, and GBM, and we chose the RF model as our final model. Based on the test set, the AUC values of the RF model to predict CE, LAA, and SAO were 0.981 (95%CI, 0.978-0.986), 0.919 (95%CI, 0.911-0.928), and 0.918 (95%CI, 0.908-0.927), respectively. The most important items to identify CE, LAA, and SAO were atrial fibrillation and degree of stenosis of intracranial arteries.ConclusionThe proposed RF model could be a useful diagnostic tool to help neurologists categorize etiologies of stroke.Clinical trial registration[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT01274117].

Project description:IntroductionPreterm birth is a leading cause of infant mortality and morbidity. Despite the improvement in the overall mortality in premature infants, the intact survival of these infants remains a significant challenge. Screening the physical growth of infants is fundamental to potentially reducing the escalation of this disorder. Recently, machine learning models have been used to predict the growth restrictions of infants; however, they frequently rely on conventional risk factors and cross-sectional data and do not leverage the longitudinal database associated with medical data from laboratory tests.MethodsThis study aimed to present an automated interpretable ML-based approach for the prediction and classification of short-term growth outcomes in preterm infants. We prepared four datasets based on weight and length including weight baseline, length baseline, weight follow-up, and length follow-up. The CHA Bundang Medical Center Neonatal Intensive Care Unit dataset was classified using two well-known supervised machine learning algorithms, namely support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR). A five-fold cross-validation, and several performance measures, including accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score were used to compare classifier performances. We further illustrated the models' trustworthiness using calibration and cumulative curves. The visualized global interpretations using Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) is provided for analyzing variables' contribution to final prediction.ResultsBased on the experimental results with area under the curve, the discrimination ability of the SVM algorithm was found to better than that of the LR model on three of the four datasets with 81%, 76% and 72% in weight follow-up, length baseline and length follow-up dataset respectively. The LR classifier achieved a better ROC score only on the weight baseline dataset with 83%. The global interpretability results revealed that pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational age, twin birth, birth weight, antenatal corticosteroid use, premature rupture of membranes, sex, and birth length were consistently ranked as important variables in both the baseline and follow-up datasets.DiscussionThe application of machine learning models to the early detection and automated classification of short-term growth outcomes in preterm infants achieved high accuracy and may provide an efficient framework for clinical decision systems enabling more effective monitoring and facilitating timely intervention.

Dataset Information

Likelihood contrasts: a machine learning algorithm for binary classification of longitudinal data.

Publications

Likelihood contrasts: a machine learning algorithm for binary classification of longitudinal data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets