Dataset Information

Association of Enacted Stigma with Depressive Symptoms Among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Have Sex with Men: Baltimore, 2011 and 2014.

ABSTRACT: Purpose: We assessed differences between gay and bisexual men in enacted stigma, and how the association between stigma and depressive symptoms may vary according to sexual orientation identity. Methods: Participants (671 gay and 331 bisexual men who have sex with men) in Baltimore's 2011 and 2014 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance completed an anonymous survey, including 3 enacted stigma dimensions and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Adjusted prevalence ratios were calculated through Generalized Estimating Equation models adjusting for theorized confounders (demographic, socioeconomic, and relational factors). Results: Bisexual men reported stigma experiences less frequently than did gay men (verbal harassment 22.7% vs. 32.3%, and discrimination 15.7% vs. 23.0%). Relevant depressive symptoms were reported by 43.1% of bisexual men and 34.2% of gay men (p?Conclusion: This study confirms the association between enacted stigma and depressive symptoms among gay and bisexual men. However, sexual orientation identity did not modify this association as hypothesized. The bisexual men presented other psychosocial stressors that may explain their higher prevalence of depressive symptoms. The high levels of verbal harassment, discrimination, and physical assault reported by gay and bisexual men and their negative effect on mental health indicate the need to develop new effective public health strategies to avoid these consequences of homophobic and biphobic culture.

SUBMITTER: Marti-Pastor M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6983736 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association of Enacted Stigma with Depressive Symptoms Among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Have Sex with Men: Baltimore, 2011 and 2014.

Marti-Pastor Marc M Ferrer Montse M Alonso Jordi J Garin Olatz O Pont Angels A Flynn Colin C German Danielle D

LGBT health 20191206 1

Purpose: We assessed differences between gay and bisexual men in enacted stigma, and how the association between stigma and depressive symptoms may vary according to sexual orientation identity. Methods: Participants (671 gay and 331 bisexual men who have sex with men) in Baltimore's 2011 and 2014 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance completed an anonymous survey, including 3 enacted stigma dimensions and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Adjusted ...[more]

PMID: 31809226

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVES:The aim of this analysis is to: (i) assess the prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms at baseline and follow-up for participants in the PROUD trial of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), examining changes in prevalence over time and (ii) investigate the association of socioeconomic and psychosocial factors with depression. METHODS:PROUD was an open label randomised trial evaluating the benefit of PrEP for 544 HIV-negative gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in England. Enrolment was between 2012 and 2014, with at least 2?years follow-up. Prevalence of depression (score ?10 on Patient Health Questionnaire-9) was assessed and compared across time-points (using McNemar's ?2 tests) and between trial arms (using ?2 tests). Cross-sectional associations with socioeconomic and psychosocial factors were examined using baseline data in modified Poisson regression models and combined 12 and 24?month follow-up data in generalised estimating equations (GEEs). Prevalence ratios (PRs) were presented as unadjusted PR and adjusted PR (aPR) for age, UK birth, sexual identity, university education, London study clinic site and calendar time (and follow-up time-point in GEEs). RESULTS:Depression increased significantly from baseline (9.1%; 49/540) to the 12?month (14.4%; 59/410) and 24?month (14.4%; 48/333) follow-ups, possibly explained by underreporting at baseline. The prevalence of depression did not differ by study trial arm, at any time-point. In the baseline analysis, younger age, unemployment and crystal methamphetamine use, was associated with depression. In combined analysis of 12 and 24?month data, measures of intimate partner violence (IPV) (lifetime IPV victimisation aPR 2.57 (95% CI: 1.71 to 3.86)), internalised homophobia (aPR 1.91 (95% CI: 1.29 to 2.83)) and concealment of sexual identity (aPR 1.75 (95% CI: 1.16 to 2.65)), were strongly associated with depression. CONCLUSIONS:There is a high concomitant burden of psychosocial factors with depression among GBMSM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:ISRCTN (ISRCTN94465371) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02065986).

Project description:BackgroundStigmatization may prompt gay, bisexual, queer and other men who have sex with men (GBQMSM) to avoid or delay HIV testing. There has been little attention to GBQMSMs' perspectives about how stigma may influence their decisions about whether, where, and how often to get tested for HIV.MethodsWe conducted nine focus groups with 64 adult GBQMSM in Metropolitan Detroit, including HIV-negative men and people living with HIV (PLWH). Data were thematically analyzed deductively and inductively in three rounds.ResultsThree themes emerged regarding whether to get tested: (1) Perceived promiscuity, risk perceptions and HIV testing; (2) Fearing sexual rejection; and (3) Fearing friend and family member distancing and rejection. Themes concerning where to get tested included: (4) Conflating HIV testing and diagnosis; and (5) Seeking privacy and safety at specialized services. As for how often to get tested, themes included: (6) Reducing contact with healthcare providers due to intersectional stigma; (7) Responsibility and regular testing; and (8) HIV stigma and testing as routine care. Black participants articulated themes (3), (4), and (6) with greater frequency than other participants. Framing HIV testing as a personal responsibility may have created a "new stigma," with unintended consequences not observed with "routine healthcare" messaging.ConclusionsGBQMSMs' perspectives indicate the potential for new foci for HIV testing promotion interventions based on stigma-related issues that they deem important. There is a need for interventions to challenge the "promiscuity" stereotype, and to reduce the sexual stigmatization of GBQMSM living with HIV/AIDS-especially online. Provider stigma requires both intervention and continued availability of specialized services. Future stigma-reduction interventions for Black GBQMSM could focus on building family support/acceptance, awareness of multiple testing options, and integrating LGBTQ-related issues into initiatives for racial justice in health care.

Dataset Information

Association of Enacted Stigma with Depressive Symptoms Among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Have Sex with Men: Baltimore, 2011 and 2014.

Publications

Association of Enacted Stigma with Depressive Symptoms Among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Have Sex with Men: Baltimore, 2011 and 2014.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets